Press "Enter" to skip to content

Ralph Nader beats his 1996 popular vote total

With results still coming in, here is the latest report from CNN.com

Obama
65,937,957
53%

McCain
57,756,060
46%

Nader
685,416

Barr
503,974

Baldwin
181,266

McKinney
148,545

Keyes
37,846

Paul
19,852

La Riva
7,467

Calero
7,197

Moore
6,563

None of these candidates
6,251

Duncan
3,703

Harris
2,618

Jay
2,346

Polachek
1,223

McEnulty
781

Wamboldt
770

Stevens
720

Amondson
639

Boss
604

Phillies
518

Weill
470

Allen
310

Lyttle
106

Nader’s 1996 total was 685,297, and we are watching for him to top 700,000 votes (Richard Winger predicts about 730,000).

We are also watching for Baldwin to top Howard Phillips’ 1996 total of 184,820, and then perhaps to top 200,000 votes, and Cynthia McKinney to top 150,000 votes.

6 Comments

  1. darolew November 11, 2008

    Percentage-wise, last I looked at the numbers, McKinney was only about 0.01%-0.02% ahead of Cobb. Pretty sad that a former congresswoman only does marginally better than an unknown party activist who wanted people to vote for Kerry.

  2. green in brooklyn November 11, 2008

    Not that it was difficult, but McKinney beat Cobb’s 2004 total handily as well, partly due to being on the ballot in Ohio and NY.

  3. Libertarian Joseph November 10, 2008

    Wasn’t the only tv time Chucky Baldwin got was that 30 second interview with Lou Dobbs before Dobbs abruptly cut him off? lol

  4. LaineRBT November 10, 2008

    Well, still it’s a good rebound for him this year considering the very undemocratic aggression that the Democrats showed in 2004.

  5. paulie cannoli Post author | November 10, 2008

    The Democrats have really done a number on him with blaming him for the 2000 election instead of looking in the mirror.

  6. LaineRBT November 10, 2008

    Good for him, seriously it’s good news. That said, I would have still hoped for far more especially in California. His performance there was rather depressing considering his 200k votes there in 1996 and 400k in 2000.

Comments are closed.