The pillaging of the Earth’s oceans
Over-fishing, fossil fuels push entire ecosystems to brink
MAY 31, 2013

View the complete issue.
The oceans of the world are vast and deep. They cover 71 percent of the Earth’s surface and contain 97 percent of the planet’s water.
The oceans seem boundless in water, marine life and energy to sustain the planet’s life and atmosphere.
But the oceans are experiencing profound stress, due to escalating factors directly related to capitalist production and the degradation of the environment.
Alarming reports by marine scientists have been sounding the danger to the world’s oceans and the need for urgent action. The International Programme on the State of the Ocean (IPSO) warns that “massive marine extinction” already may be underway due to rapidly worsening stresses on marine ecosystems. But, as capitalism’s search for profits intensifies, the devastation of the oceans is only accelerating.
Three main stresses — global warming, acidification of the oceans, and decreased oxygen —have led to such declines in many of the marine ecosystems that the conditions have met or surpassed “worst-case scenarios” predicted in the first decade of this 21st century.
IPSO stated in 2011, “[W]e now face losing marine species and entire marine ecosystems, such as coral reefs, within a single generation. Unless action is taken now, the consequences of our activities are at a high risk of causing, through the combined effects of climate change, overexploitation, pollution and habitat loss, the next globally significant extinction event in the ocean. It is notable that the occurrence of multiple high intensity stressors has been a prerequisite for all the five global extinction events of the past 600 million years.”
Such a catastrophe would, needless to say, affect humanity and all life on Earth. Yet capitalists have rejected in international forums even basic accords to limit the exploitation of the oceans or to slow down the belching of fossil fuels into the environment. By far the biggest abuser of the environment is the United States.
Global warming and CO2
The massive use of fossil fuels, deforestation and resulting accumulations of carbon dioxide (CO2) wreak perhaps the greatest environmental damage on the oceans. Yet, of all Earth’s ecosystems, the oceans have been the least studied and monitored.
The Pacific Marine Environment Laboratory at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration estimates that 22 million metric tons of CO2 are added to the oceans every day.
The result is acidification. With increased acid, whole species — from phytoplankton to algae to corals to crustaceans to all types of mollusks, including oysters and clams — are threatened because the acid hampers or prevents their ability to form shells by their natural process of calcification.
Coral reefs are being killed by bleaching due to the rise in ocean temperatures. In just the last three years, there have been total die-offs of oysters in the Pacific Northwest, Maryland’s Chesapeake Bay and Florida’s Panhandle region due to acidification and changed salinity. As each species is interlinked with and dependent on another, there is a cascading effect with the death of any life form.
At the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, CO2 in the atmosphere was an estimated 228 parts per million. The New York Times reported this month that it has now reached 400 ppm. The first global 50 ppm increase took 175 years, while the second took just 30 years. The French Academy of Sciences National Committee on Global Change predicts the saturation could reach 700 ppm of CO2 in the earth’s atmosphere by 2100.
Conglomerates strip ocean’s resources
Before the high-technology development of giant fishing trawlers and massive industrial exploitation of the ocean, seafood delicacies like shrimp, oysters and salmon were not as easily harvested in the United States and developed countries. Those sea organisms could reproduce at a sustainable rate.
Today, in the United States, Europe, Japan and other industrialized countries, seemingly limitless amounts of seafood are available.
Starting in the 1980s, advertising that accompanied the great rise in industrial fishing and globalized trade, led to a great increase in production and consumption.
But the availability of “all-you-can-eat” lobster, shrimp and salmon comes at a high price, far beyond what one pays in a restaurant or grocery bill. For example, it takes five to eight pounds of fish to produce one pound of “farmed” salmon.
The extensive 2012 “State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture” report of the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO, shows that only 13 percent of the world’s fisheries — the natural giant reserves in the oceans — are exploited at a level that assures reproduction at a positive rate. About 57 percent of the fisheries are “fully exploited,” meaning they are at their maximum rate before sustainability is affected, while 30 percent are “over-exploited.” The latter means a net loss in the population.
Thus, overfishing has severely impacted 87 percent of the world’s fisheries.
Underdeveloped countries in Africa see their ocean fisheries exploited, often illegally or through unscrupulous contracts signed by governments with foreign fishing corporations. Lacking technology, the peoples of those countries cannot benefit from their own region’s resources.
With a worldwide system of planning and cooperation based on socialist economic principles, oceanic scientists, environmentalists and governments could abide by agreements to limit fishing. This way the fisheries could recover and provide for the long term.
Wipe out one species, then another
The jack mackerel is just one example of how, under capitalism, the corporations wipe out one species after another in the search for maximum profits.
Jack mackerel in the South Pacific was recently targeted after other major fish species declined. It now faces total demise. From an average yearly catch of 5 million tons by industrial fishers off the coast of Chile in the 1990s, it dropped to 700,000 tons in 2010.
A chilling Jan. 25, 2012, New York Times article, “In Mackerel Plunder, Hints of a Fish Collapse,” stated that European vessels caught only 2,261 tons in 2011, down 98 percent from their 111,000 tons in 2009.
The article quoted eminent oceanographer Daniel Pauly, who described the situation of jack mackerel in the southern Pacific as a dramatic indication of the ecosystem as a whole. “This is the last of the buffaloes,” he said. “When they’re gone, everything will be gone.”
Norwegian, Dutch, Chilean, Russian, Chinese and other super-trawlers are scrambling for the remaining jack mackerel, but scientists warn that a five-year ban is needed to have any hope of saving them. That is unlikely to happen.
Tuna has become highly prized for sushi and other seafood products. Now five of eight species, especially the Atlantic, Pacific and Southern Bluefin, are “extremely endangered” and face extinction unless harvesting them actually is halted. But several attempts to ban its exploitation have failed because of the bigger importers and producers.
The decline in any one species in turn affects the viability of other species, and the overall effect is magnified.
Oceans, the Earth’s circulatory system
Weather in all its forms — seasons, storms, snow and rain — originates and is driven by the oceans. The differences in temperatures and ocean salt levels generate continuous currents and air circulation. The water that comes down from the skies to nourish life, the winds that cool and warm the land, these result from the oceans’ circulation, known as “thermohaline circulation.”
The major and continuing changes in salt content and CO2 levels, plus warmer ocean temperatures, are creating more intense weather storms on the one hand, and the quickening rate of ice melt.
The number of Category 4 and 5 hurricanes nearly doubled from the 1970s to the 2000s, from 50 every five years to 90 every five years. More than 100 million people live within three feet of average sea level. The poorest populations are the most vulnerable to global habitat changes, warming, and rising sea levels.
Environmentalists, oceanographers and other scientists frequently meet in conferences and publish analytical papers to warn about the urgent need for corporate restraint and environmental recovery policies. They provide critically essential knowledge and data. For the average person, knowledge and a more conscious personal environmental lifestyle are important.
But all these environmentalist practices can’t put a sufficient dent in the rapacious action of the capitalists.
The situation is indeed dire. But it is not a time to despair. It is a time to educate, to organize and to fight against capitalism’s destruction of the earth. And more urgent than ever is the need for revolutionary struggle and a socialist system to save the planet. It is not rhetoric, it is reality.
Content may be reprinted with credit to LiberationNews.org.
Article source:
http://www.pslweb.org/liberationnews/newspaper/vol-7-no-7/the-pillaging-of-the-earths-oceans.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_libertarianism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-market_environmentalism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_Economics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eco-capitalism
You assert I have no actual answers to a fabricated question. you are right…I have no answers to why global warming is a hoax by environazi’s looking to legislate from a position of being the boogeyman. In fact…there is no answer…unless coming out of an ice age causes warming…and the opposite causes cooling. I have a better one…unicorns are causing gas shortages in Atlantis. Show me your facts that disprove this. hahahahahaha, laughable argument that my facts don’t disprove your imagination. Your problem isn’t that I can’t back up my position…it is that the facts are not backing up yours and it makes you angry that I’m not believing you.
More interesting is that you have no actual answers to what I am discussing. SOP for deniers – prevaricate, try to distract by calling people names etc.
You have no fact based answers.
“fakers and frauds that are claiming that climate change is untrue…” so those that disagree with unfounded faked and fraudulent data are fakers and frauds…that seems like all people, on this issue, are fakers and frauds. Why did global warming change to climate change? was it the lack of evidence…or did your movement just need a new name because the fraud about the climate warming was disproved? keep spinning it, you’re bound to get it right….eventually?
Tes, well, if you look at the MSC statement of purpose it states clearly that the supposed task of the org is to insure sustainable fisheries. Sustainable, not despoiling. Why else would they be so interested in offering labeling that gauruntees the sustainability of the fishing that brought the sea food to market.
On the other hand, there was a fascinating report earlier this year that MSC was just a front for corporate/industrial fishing industry. And that quite often the MSC gives it’s official sustainable stamp to fisheries that were not in fact sustainable at all. And if what you claim is true, it seems that this is true.
And if what you say is at all true then you saying teh MSC does not believe in climate change, wouldn’t it be true then that the MSC is abt pimping for fish farming corporations, wht why would any claims they may make that climate change is not true be valid?
As far as providing you information to enlighten you abt climate change, the internet is full of it. And in deed full of fakers and frauds that are claiming that climate change is untrue as a means of excusing their rapacity.
I was part of the MSC and supported it when I worked as an importer of seafood from around the world…and the main goal was to organize fishermen to make many species available in manageable fisheries or farms. This is not done to save a species from extinction…it is to maintain sellable quantities of food. There is no altruism involved. When you say my climate change denial is not based on factual information…can you please separate the “factual information” you are using to prove there is global warming from the proven instances of scientific fraud and mischaracterizing of facts. That would be very helpful to educate me on how the earth’s warming is in direct contradiction to it’s cooling…and the evidence shown recently that no actual evidence has been recorded in…what…15 years now? hahahaha, yeah, you can’t prove a negative by shifting the burden to someone else. My “propaganda” is simply you have no evidence that can be verified by anyone NOT INVOLVED in the power grab being attempted by those who wish to use environmental legislation to bring an end to capitalism that if seen by those people as harmful…even though the answer they have is to pillage what others have accomplished until everyone is equally miserable. By all means…keep informing me with your “facts”. I love a good story.
@1, anonymous commenter. I’m not defending the PSL, but, your climate change denial is not based on factual information and your comments are more propaganda than the PSL article. All you say is blah blah blah, government, corrupt, moochers etc. At least these stalinists present actual information instead of just rant.
A few actual facts. The MSC was founded in 1999 by people who realized and acknowledged that the sea life are in decline. Their focus is on “certifying” sustainable fisheries. Why? because in fact the rapacious fishing had severely depleted the oceans life forms. Duh.
Complete crock of doo doo. The ministry of propaganda is working overtime. My favorite part is when it claims that “the environment is stressed”…really…really? Stressed…that’s what you think…maybe we should dump a few loads of Xanax in the ocean. These idiots think that it is about capitalism…it is about feeding the world. Global warming…blah blah hoax, mirrors, studies, corrupted scientists looking for gov’t grants will say what the gov’t needs to control the people. The Marine Stewardship Council rejects and rebuffs all this nonsense. They need to get real jobs…and quit living off gov’t/tax funded “research grants”. bums with their hands out and a PHD…sad.