Warren Redlich: “Carl Paladino and the Mosque”

H/T Eric Sundwall in comments on Warren Redlich, Kristin Davis disagree on “Mosque” in New York City:

Warren Redlich, Libertarian for Governor of New York in the Westchester Herald:


Redlich_WarrenWarren Redlich.

ALBANY, NY, July 22, 2010 — Carl Paladino's "Mosque" press release (see below) was forwarded to me just now. 

I oppose Mr. Paladino's plan to waste money, and abuse property  rights through eminent domain

For one thing, condos in that part of Manhattan have been known to sell for $3 million or more. In an eminent domain proceeding, a property like this could cost the state tens of milliions of dollars. The state would then have to spend tens of millions more to build something at the site for a public purpose.

To sustain any kind of public purpose argument for an eminent domain proceeding, the state would also have to purchase and develop other properties in the area. This would dramatically increase the cost to New York taxpayers into the hundreds of millions.

Mr. Paladino's knee-jerk proposal to abuse property rights and the First Amendment will worsen our state's budget crisis. As he and Rick Lazio race to win votes through the politics of hate, I will continue to fight for the Constitution and liberty.

For further information about the Warren Redlich for Governor campaign visit the http://wredlich.com/ny website.

PALADINO: "AS GOVERNOR I'LL USE EMINENT DOMAIN TO BLOCK THE MOSQUE"

(BUFFALO, NY) - Buffalo Developer and lawyer Carl Paladino said today that he would use the powers of eminent domain to stop a mosque from being constructed near the Ground Zero site inNew York City

"As Governor I will use the power of eminent domain to stop this mosque and make the site a war memorial instead of a monument to those who attacked our country," Paladino said in a thirty second radio spot playing statewide beginning Wednesday evening.

A successful lawyer and developer who built and manages a half billion dollar commercial  real estate portfolio, Paladino scoffed at critics who claim federal  law prohibits his strategy to stop the Islamic mosque. "I've been driving land-use issues for 40 years, and I understand the full powers of the governor," he said. "If the ACLU or anyone else wants to challenge me in court, I'm ready for the fight."

" Andrew Cuomo supports the mosque," Paladino said. "He says it is about religious freedom and he says the mosque construction should proceed. I say it is disrespectful to the thousands who died on 9-11 and their families, insulting to the thousands of troops who've been killed or injured in the ensuing wars and an affront to American people. And it must be stopped."

"There is little to no democracy in the  Middle East other than Israel. The Islamic fundamentalists are Fascists – women have limited rights, there is no free speech or  freedom of expression, and citizens are subject to the often barbaric Sharia Law. I oppose a mosque near the site of Ground Zero, not because of race, but because of the ideology of the Islamic fundamentalists," said Paladino.

Paladino, a Republican candidate for Governor of New York, kicked off an advertising campaign to rally statewide opposition to the proposed Islamic mosque at Ground Zero in New York City and called outDemocrat candidate Andrew Cuomo for backing the divisive mosque.

Carl Paladino declared his candidacy for Governor of New York in Buffalo in April. He and Tom Ognibene, candidate for Lt. Governor, have petitioned their way into the Republican Primary and are canvassing also to create a Tea Party-oriented line – the Taxpayers Party. For more information on where Carl Paladino stands on the issues, please visit www.paladinoforthepeople.com.

29 thoughts on “Warren Redlich: “Carl Paladino and the Mosque”

  1. paulie Post author

    http://reason.com/blog/2010/07/22/new-at-reason-steve-chapman-on

    This week, Sarah Palin posted Twitter comments urging Muslims and New Yorkers to put a stop to a proposed Islamic community center near Ground Zero because the pain from the 9/11 attacks “is too raw, too real.” But as Steve Chapman explains, Palin’s position is hard to reconcile with the reverence she and her fans claim to hold for the Founding Fathers, who gave the highest protection to religious freedom.

  2. Thomas L. Knapp

    There is no “proposed Islamic mosque” in question.

    There’s a proposed Islamic cultural center.

    The two are not the same thing, any more than a YMCA is a cathedral or a Jewish Cultural Center is a synagogue.

    And of course, even if the proposed project WAS a mosque, using the force of government to prevent its construction would be about as wrong and evil as it’s humanly possible to get short of actually hijacking some planes and flying them into it.

  3. Erik G.

    And people wonder why I detest the perceived connection of Republicans and Libertarians.

    This is just more GOP garbage.

    Thankfully Warren Redlich is (mostly) a voice of reason in this debate.

  4. Eric Sundwall

    TK – of course even if it were a mosque, it would still be an issue of freedom. We released a statement yesterday to that effect.

    Paladino compounds the problem by issuing the threat of Eminent Domain. What’s not clear is what the effect will be on voters. The reactionary intolerance on the right, won’t like this from us. The more liberal oriented will bve satisfied with the Cuomo ‘schuck and jive’ and will largely not consider this a factor in their vote.

    I’ll maintain the position that we are correct to decry the knee jerks, votes be damned. We’re obviously getting more media than the boobs btw. Unless you consider Dondero’s blog as consequential.

  5. Pingback: Palin sparks Twitter fight on mosque

  6. Vaughn

    I like Carl’s ‘gay marriage section’ on his campaign site: ‘I treat gays and lesbians as equals but I don’t want them to have rights’.

  7. Thomas M. Sipos

    Paladino is either a legal idiot, or cynically lying to voters.

    I say this because his call to use eminent domain to block the mosque is likely unconstitutional — and he should know this.

    The Constitution restricts eminent domain powers to a “public purpose.” Yes, the state has pretty broad powers as to what constitutes a “public purpose.” But, if there’s a paper trail that the state acted in “bad faith” in defining “public purpose”, then a court will often toss out a state’s eminent domain attempt.

    That’s what an eminent domain lawyer told me.

    Paladino has now created a paper trail such that, if he now claims the state needs that space for a public purpose, a lawyer can prove that his real motive is religious bigotry.

    And on top of violating the Constitution’s “public purpose” requirement by acting in general “bad faith,” Paladino’s specific “bad faith” is a violation of the First Amendment’s Free Exercise of religion rights.

    He’s either a bigoted idiot — or a smart bigot who thinks the voters are bigoted idiots.

  8. Pingback: Tom Knapp: ‘Yes, this is a litmus test’ | Independent Political Report

  9. Pingback: Daniel Wiener at Libertarian Party blog: ‘Islamic Cultural Center and the Heckler’s Veto’ | Independent Political Report

  10. Pingback: Wayne Root: ‘Why the 9/11 Mosque Controversy Is NOT About Religious Freedom…and Should Be Stopped!’ | Independent Political Report

  11. Pingback: Blogosphere reactions to Wayne Root’s ‘Why the 9/11 Mosque Controversy Is NOT About Religious Freedom…and Should Be Stopped!’ | Independent Political Report

  12. Pingback: Darryl Perry: In Support of the (non)”Mosque” (not) at “Ground Zero” | Independent Political Report

  13. Pingback: Video: New York Libertarian candidate Warren Redlich comments on “mosque” controversy | Independent Political Report

  14. Pingback: Irregular Times » Blog Archive » NY Republican: Ban Religion in NYC to prevent the spread of Repression

  15. Pingback: Statement on the ‘Ground Zero Mosque’ by Jake Towne | Independent Political Report

  16. Pingback: Howie Hawkins (G-NY) Decries Attack on Proposed Muslim Center near World Trade Center | Independent Political Report

  17. Pingback: Libertarian Party Blog: ‘Ron Paul, former LP Presidential candidate, supports property rights of Islamic cultural Center supporters’ | Independent Political Report

  18. Pingback: Phil Maymin: In the Lower Manhattan Islamic center debate, everyone is pretending to be something they’re not | Independent Political Report

  19. Pingback: Libertarian Mike Beitler: ‘Mosque issue hijacked for political expediency’ | Independent Political Report

  20. Pingback: Libertarian Peacenik on the “Ground Zero Mosque” and the Libertarian Party | Independent Political Report

  21. Pingback: George Phillies: ‘Islamophobia is an opposite of Libertarian’ | Independent Political Report

  22. Pingback: Green Howie Hawkins: 911, the Mosque and “why do republican rightwingers hate our freedom” | Independent Political Report

  23. Pingback: Conservative Party of New York State campaigns against ‘Mosque at Ground Zero’ | Independent Political Report

Leave a Reply