Comments on: New Philadelphia Inquirer Editorial on Use of State Resources in Challenge to Nader 2004 Petition

By: What is Aromatherapy really? : Scents Obsession

What is Aromatherapy really? : Scents Obsession — Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:10:06 +0000

[...] New Philadelphia Inquirer Editorial on Use of State Resources in … [...]

By: What is Aromatherapy really?

What is Aromatherapy really? — Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:05:01 +0000

[...] New Philadelphia Inquirer Editorial on Use of State Resources in … [...]

By: Green Party fan

Green Party fan — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:52:38 +0000

Interview with Green Party Presidential Nominee Antanas Mockus

Columbia…

http://www.colombianews.tv/news/31410-interview-green-party-presidential-nominee-antanas-mockus

By: Green Party fan

Green Party fan — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:47:50 +0000

The Philadelphia Inquirer is cheered and applauded for more fair treatment of the Green Party’s Ralph Nader!!!

Carl Romanilli also…

Thank you..

By: IT industry is divided over wireless chargers | Articles About Laptop Notebooks Online

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:55:03 +0000

[...] New Philadelphia Inquirer Editorial on Use of State Resources in Challenge to Nader 2004 Petition | … [...]

By: Mik Robertson

Mik Robertson — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:12:38 +0000

Go Oliver!

By: Reply to Duopoly Central ..........

Reply to Duopoly Central .......... — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:42:41 +0000

Perot, Perot, Nader, Nader, Nader ………..

They ain’t perfect but matched up to Dems and GOP they come off as secular saints ………… Lake

By: Ross Levin

Ross Levin — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:44:09 +0000

Here’s a letter printed today in response:

Re: “Bonusgate’s coattails,” Thursday:

Thank you for saying Attorney General Tom Corbett should not have accepted campaign contributions from the Reed Smith law firm and its attorneys while he was investigating whether state employees unlawfully used taxpayer funds and resources to prepare Reed Smith’s challenge of petitions for presidential candidate Ralph Nader in 2004.

Corbett should remedy his conflict of interest by returning Reed Smith’s money and charging any attorney who knowingly joined or aided the criminal conspiracy that Corbett’s office is prosecuting. Corbett pledged not to accept contributions from parties involved in his “Bonusgate” investigation, and Reed Smith has now confirmed that it was involved. Corbett must give Reed Smith’s money back.

Finally, the claim that Nader’s 2004 nomination petitions were “fraudulent” is patently false. As Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Thomas Saylor has demonstrated, despite the bombastic language in trial Judge James Gardner Colins’ opinion, only a tiny number of signatures – 1.3 percent of the total – were counted as so-called “forgeries,” and these resulted from pranks or sabotage. This can be confirmed by reference to Colins’ own opinion. To continue repeating this smear, therefore, is inaccurate.

Oliver B. Hall

Counsel to Ralph Nader

Washington

http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20100315_Letters_to_the_Editor.html