<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wayne Root criticizes Wes Benedict, LPHQ for failing to post his media appearances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/</link>
	<description>Covering America's third parties and independent candidates since May 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:42:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Lake .......... to BC/BS</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-159229</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Lake .......... to BC/BS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-159229</guid>
		<description>Bruce Cohen: The only people who can unpolarize are those who have chosen to be polarized. Become the unpolarization you want to see, folks.

You can start with yourself, instead of throwing stones in your glass house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce Cohen: The only people who can unpolarize are those who have chosen to be polarized. Become the unpolarization you want to see, folks.</p>
<p>You can start with yourself, instead of throwing stones in your glass house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas L. Knapp</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-159192</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas L. Knapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-159192</guid>
		<description>Howard Dean is no longer chair of the DNC. Tim Kaine is.

Root opposite Steele in a debate would be fun in a slapstick, pie-throwing kind of way.

Root opposite Kaine, I don&#039;t know about.

Root isn&#039;t even close to being in Dean&#039;s league. A debate between the two would leave a giant smoking crater under the place where Root&#039;s chair had been placed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard Dean is no longer chair of the DNC. Tim Kaine is.</p>
<p>Root opposite Steele in a debate would be fun in a slapstick, pie-throwing kind of way.</p>
<p>Root opposite Kaine, I don&#8217;t know about.</p>
<p>Root isn&#8217;t even close to being in Dean&#8217;s league. A debate between the two would leave a giant smoking crater under the place where Root&#8217;s chair had been placed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denver Delegate</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-159175</link>
		<dc:creator>Denver Delegate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-159175</guid>
		<description>Ernest Hancock has also announced for LNC Chairman.

Root says that he wants to be LNC Chairman to give him a portfolio to get on stage opposite the DNC&#039;s Howard Dean and the RNC&#039;s Michael Steele.

George Phillies may not be cut out for that. But Ernest Hancock is ... perhaps he&#039;s the radicals answer to Root ... Phillies could help steer the LNC as Vice-Chairman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ernest Hancock has also announced for LNC Chairman.</p>
<p>Root says that he wants to be LNC Chairman to give him a portfolio to get on stage opposite the DNC&#8217;s Howard Dean and the RNC&#8217;s Michael Steele.</p>
<p>George Phillies may not be cut out for that. But Ernest Hancock is &#8230; perhaps he&#8217;s the radicals answer to Root &#8230; Phillies could help steer the LNC as Vice-Chairman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Cohen's Glass House</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-159169</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Cohen's Glass House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-159169</guid>
		<description>Bruce Cohen: &lt;i&gt;The only people who can unpolarize are those who have chosen to be polarized.  Become the unpolarization you want to see, folks.&lt;/i&gt;

You can start with yourself, instead of throwing stones in your glass house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce Cohen: <i>The only people who can unpolarize are those who have chosen to be polarized.  Become the unpolarization you want to see, folks.</i></p>
<p>You can start with yourself, instead of throwing stones in your glass house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-159157</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-159157</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I have repeatedly asked for a “libertarian” rationalization for US wars, and been given nothing but rehashed and easily refuted neocon rationalizations). Obviously after all this time, there is NO “libertarian” rationalization for these wars.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

While I completely disagree with them, Starchild and Brian Holtz do ground their interventionism in libertarian principles. I just think they misapply them, but their reasons for war are not the same as the neocons&#039; reasons for war, even if the end result is the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I have repeatedly asked for a “libertarian” rationalization for US wars, and been given nothing but rehashed and easily refuted neocon rationalizations). Obviously after all this time, there is NO “libertarian” rationalization for these wars.</p></blockquote>
<p>While I completely disagree with them, Starchild and Brian Holtz do ground their interventionism in libertarian principles. I just think they misapply them, but their reasons for war are not the same as the neocons&#8217; reasons for war, even if the end result is the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what huh?</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-159144</link>
		<dc:creator>what huh?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-159144</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Wayne has been calling himself ‘libertarian’ long before anyone asked him to join the LP.&lt;/i&gt;

Who the hell asked him to join the LP, exactly?

Eric Dondero Rittberg?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Wayne has been calling himself ‘libertarian’ long before anyone asked him to join the LP.</i></p>
<p>Who the hell asked him to join the LP, exactly?</p>
<p>Eric Dondero Rittberg?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-159101</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-159101</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t know, Paulie. Doesn’t the LP maintain a speakers bureau of people who are competent to talk on various issues?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not to my knowledge. Of course, it&#039;s possible that my knowledge on this is lacking.

&lt;blockquote&gt;In fact, the LP ought to have a “shadow cabinet” of experts willing and able to appear on talk shows, etc. that your media coordinator books.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The party used to have one. Tom Knapp has informally revived the idea (http://shadowcabinet.us), but it hasn&#039;t gained a lot of traction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I don’t know, Paulie. Doesn’t the LP maintain a speakers bureau of people who are competent to talk on various issues?</p></blockquote>
<p>Not to my knowledge. Of course, it&#8217;s possible that my knowledge on this is lacking.</p>
<blockquote><p>In fact, the LP ought to have a “shadow cabinet” of experts willing and able to appear on talk shows, etc. that your media coordinator books.</p></blockquote>
<p>The party used to have one. Tom Knapp has informally revived the idea (<a href="http://shadowcabinet.us" rel="nofollow">http://shadowcabinet.us</a>), but it hasn&#8217;t gained a lot of traction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven R Linnabary</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-158969</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven R Linnabary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-158969</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Blaming Wayne for polarization in the LP is like blaming the water for making you wet.&lt;/i&gt;

Well, somebody is clearly all wet.

Root consistently misstates general libertarian principles as well as Libertarian Party principles.  And it isn&#039;t only on the war issue (to be fair, I have repeatedly asked for a &quot;libertarian&quot; rationalization for US wars, and been given nothing but rehashed and easily refuted neocon rationalizations).  Obviously after all this time, there is NO &quot;libertarian&quot; rationalization for these wars.

And Root was clearly an embarrassment to the LP on Fox with Juan Williams a few months ago.  Root COULD have taken the high road, but idiotically referred to Obama as a racist for standing by the victim of out of control police instead of standing by the rogue cop.

If Root wants to be something other than polarizing, he needs to understand what it means to be Libertarian.

Consistently misstating Libertarian principles in the media and then sending out threatening emails when this isn&#039;t appreciated is, well...polarizing, or maybe just all wet.

PEACE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Blaming Wayne for polarization in the LP is like blaming the water for making you wet.</i></p>
<p>Well, somebody is clearly all wet.</p>
<p>Root consistently misstates general libertarian principles as well as Libertarian Party principles.  And it isn&#8217;t only on the war issue (to be fair, I have repeatedly asked for a &#8220;libertarian&#8221; rationalization for US wars, and been given nothing but rehashed and easily refuted neocon rationalizations).  Obviously after all this time, there is NO &#8220;libertarian&#8221; rationalization for these wars.</p>
<p>And Root was clearly an embarrassment to the LP on Fox with Juan Williams a few months ago.  Root COULD have taken the high road, but idiotically referred to Obama as a racist for standing by the victim of out of control police instead of standing by the rogue cop.</p>
<p>If Root wants to be something other than polarizing, he needs to understand what it means to be Libertarian.</p>
<p>Consistently misstating Libertarian principles in the media and then sending out threatening emails when this isn&#8217;t appreciated is, well&#8230;polarizing, or maybe just all wet.</p>
<p>PEACE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AroundtheblockAFT</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-158955</link>
		<dc:creator>AroundtheblockAFT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-158955</guid>
		<description>Giving this further thought, the formation of a shadow cabinet of experts and lining up speaking appearances would be a great job for a retired, astute, platform-savvy LPer, maybe with a career in marketing,  who still wants to devote significant time to the LP, like maybe one of the five at-large NatCom reps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giving this further thought, the formation of a shadow cabinet of experts and lining up speaking appearances would be a great job for a retired, astute, platform-savvy LPer, maybe with a career in marketing,  who still wants to devote significant time to the LP, like maybe one of the five at-large NatCom reps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AroundtheblockAFT</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-158937</link>
		<dc:creator>AroundtheblockAFT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-158937</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know, Paulie.  Doesn&#039;t the LP maintain a speakers bureau of people who are competent to talk on various issues?  Not some state chair or candidate but, say, a professor of economics or a person with foreign policy or extensive military experience.    In fact, the LP ought to have a &quot;shadow cabinet&quot; of experts willing and able to appear on talk shows, etc. that your media coordinator books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, Paulie.  Doesn&#8217;t the LP maintain a speakers bureau of people who are competent to talk on various issues?  Not some state chair or candidate but, say, a professor of economics or a person with foreign policy or extensive military experience.    In fact, the LP ought to have a &#8220;shadow cabinet&#8221; of experts willing and able to appear on talk shows, etc. that your media coordinator books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Cohen</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-158924</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-158924</guid>
		<description>Is Wayne the polarizing one?

I think it just might not be Wayne.
It&#039;s the same people yelling at their imaginary enemy every time.

Before Wayne, it was me or someone else.
They polarize themselves.
They are the polarizing ones.

Wayne has been calling himself &#039;libertarian&#039; long before anyone asked him to join the LP.

On TV and in print.

Blaming Wayne for polarization in the LP is like blaming the water for making you wet.

The LP already is polarized and has been since the beginning.

The only people who can unpolarize are those who have chosen to be polarized.

Become the unpolarization you want to see, folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Wayne the polarizing one?</p>
<p>I think it just might not be Wayne.<br />
It&#8217;s the same people yelling at their imaginary enemy every time.</p>
<p>Before Wayne, it was me or someone else.<br />
They polarize themselves.<br />
They are the polarizing ones.</p>
<p>Wayne has been calling himself &#8216;libertarian&#8217; long before anyone asked him to join the LP.</p>
<p>On TV and in print.</p>
<p>Blaming Wayne for polarization in the LP is like blaming the water for making you wet.</p>
<p>The LP already is polarized and has been since the beginning.</p>
<p>The only people who can unpolarize are those who have chosen to be polarized.</p>
<p>Become the unpolarization you want to see, folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-158906</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-158906</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;media coordinator, lining up media appearances for libertarian experts on all sorts of issues, &lt;/i&gt;

I know someone who is very good at this and is willing to do so for free, at least for now. What libertarian experts are we trying to get booked to talk about what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>media coordinator, lining up media appearances for libertarian experts on all sorts of issues, </i></p>
<p>I know someone who is very good at this and is willing to do so for free, at least for now. What libertarian experts are we trying to get booked to talk about what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AroundtheblockAFT</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-158904</link>
		<dc:creator>AroundtheblockAFT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-158904</guid>
		<description>Root strikes me as an odd choice for Chair as he is polarizing, not uniting.  And his executive skills are not apparent.   However, his ability to get media appearances - while there is no general election going on -  seems to far surpass that of any LP figure in the past.     Root could best use these talents to serve the party by being its media coordinator, lining up media appearances for libertarian experts on all sorts of issues, not just presenting himself as &quot;the&quot; libertarian with &quot;the&quot; position.

Irrespective of Mr. Root&#039;s views, I find it strange that his appearances are being laughed out because the talk show or whatever is small potatoes.  Hey folks, we need to be heard locally by every small show out there in order to grow the party from the grass roots up.  And, don&#039;t forget, small town host today may be nationally syndicated   host tomorrow who remembers how gracious the LP guest was who came on when only 500 insomniacs were listening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Root strikes me as an odd choice for Chair as he is polarizing, not uniting.  And his executive skills are not apparent.   However, his ability to get media appearances &#8211; while there is no general election going on &#8211;  seems to far surpass that of any LP figure in the past.     Root could best use these talents to serve the party by being its media coordinator, lining up media appearances for libertarian experts on all sorts of issues, not just presenting himself as &#8220;the&#8221; libertarian with &#8220;the&#8221; position.</p>
<p>Irrespective of Mr. Root&#8217;s views, I find it strange that his appearances are being laughed out because the talk show or whatever is small potatoes.  Hey folks, we need to be heard locally by every small show out there in order to grow the party from the grass roots up.  And, don&#8217;t forget, small town host today may be nationally syndicated   host tomorrow who remembers how gracious the LP guest was who came on when only 500 insomniacs were listening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melty</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-158903</link>
		<dc:creator>Melty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-158903</guid>
		<description>Fox News Neocons Love Root makes a valid point @31. Fox News won&#039;t promote antiwar libertarians. Ron Paul, though, has succeeded in getting some mainstream media play for his End-US-Empire message. Wayne Root could too, but he doesn&#039;t because he&#039;s not antiwar. Root maintains his pro-Israel-expansion stance. Given the current ills, a strong noninterventionist message is an essential talking point, if not the most important one. For a change, now that we have Wes Benedict, the national party has been talking noninterventionism quite nicely lately.
Root has great potential to put forth a libertarian message, but he fails because he frames everything in terms of the two-party paradigm . . . exactly the mentality to break free of. If only he would break himself free of that mentality, he would be a great asset. As he is, he sporadically does good, and consistantly does harm.
Not to worry though. The LP could do alot to protect itself from Root/Beck/Boortz.../... damage by simply fixing its image on its website. Drop the wretched slogan and talk freedom right. &quot;Lower Taxes&quot; and &quot;Smaller Government&quot; are Republican cliches and everybody says they&#039;re for &quot;More Freedom&quot;. Say &quot;Cut Spending&quot;, &quot;Ban Torture&quot;, &quot;Live and Let Live&quot;, . . . say things of meaning, things of a libertarian nature, things the wretched old parties won&#039;t do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News Neocons Love Root makes a valid point @31. Fox News won&#8217;t promote antiwar libertarians. Ron Paul, though, has succeeded in getting some mainstream media play for his End-US-Empire message. Wayne Root could too, but he doesn&#8217;t because he&#8217;s not antiwar. Root maintains his pro-Israel-expansion stance. Given the current ills, a strong noninterventionist message is an essential talking point, if not the most important one. For a change, now that we have Wes Benedict, the national party has been talking noninterventionism quite nicely lately.<br />
Root has great potential to put forth a libertarian message, but he fails because he frames everything in terms of the two-party paradigm . . . exactly the mentality to break free of. If only he would break himself free of that mentality, he would be a great asset. As he is, he sporadically does good, and consistantly does harm.<br />
Not to worry though. The LP could do alot to protect itself from Root/Beck/Boortz&#8230;/&#8230; damage by simply fixing its image on its website. Drop the wretched slogan and talk freedom right. &#8220;Lower Taxes&#8221; and &#8220;Smaller Government&#8221; are Republican cliches and everybody says they&#8217;re for &#8220;More Freedom&#8221;. Say &#8220;Cut Spending&#8221;, &#8220;Ban Torture&#8221;, &#8220;Live and Let Live&#8221;, . . . say things of meaning, things of a libertarian nature, things the wretched old parties won&#8217;t do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Read carefully</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-158894</link>
		<dc:creator>Read carefully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-158894</guid>
		<description>I agree with #27
Read carefully, and very detailed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with #27<br />
Read carefully, and very detailed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-158882</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-158882</guid>
		<description>Wayne Root isn&#039;t the nominee of the LP currently.  The LPUS should not be echoing his pronouncements let alone posting his schedule.  The same for any other former nominee or potential nominee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wayne Root isn&#8217;t the nominee of the LP currently.  The LPUS should not be echoing his pronouncements let alone posting his schedule.  The same for any other former nominee or potential nominee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fox News Neocons Love Root</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-158846</link>
		<dc:creator>Fox News Neocons Love Root</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-158846</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;how often do you think George Phillies will be invited on Fox News or other media outlets to preach LP sermon. Maybe once, maybe, more likely never.&lt;/i&gt;

Well, of course never.

Fox News would never promote a truly antiwar libertarian.  Which is why&#039;s Root&#039;s appearances are so destructive to the LP.  Root creates the illusion that libertarianism is merely a variation on neocon Republicanism.

No publicity for the LP would be better than bad publicity, which is what Root is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>how often do you think George Phillies will be invited on Fox News or other media outlets to preach LP sermon. Maybe once, maybe, more likely never.</i></p>
<p>Well, of course never.</p>
<p>Fox News would never promote a truly antiwar libertarian.  Which is why&#8217;s Root&#8217;s appearances are so destructive to the LP.  Root creates the illusion that libertarianism is merely a variation on neocon Republicanism.</p>
<p>No publicity for the LP would be better than bad publicity, which is what Root is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Young</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-158844</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-158844</guid>
		<description>Root&#039;s ability to get media might be a reason to vote for him for the party&#039;s Presidential nominee, but it&#039;s not a reason to vote for him for Chair.  If Root loses the Chair election, he&#039;ll still be running for President and he&#039;ll still be getting all the earned media he can.  In fact, being Chair might hinder his ability to get earned media.  For instance, Bill Redpath is a very telegenic guy, and he&#039;s gotten his fair share of earned media as Chair, but he&#039;s arguably been hampered by his actual duties as Chair (for instance, he could have run a more effective Gubernatorial race last cycle had he been able to focus on it full-time rather than being Chair as well).

George Phillies won&#039;t be getting a lot of earned media as Chair, but he&#039;ll be devoting himself nearly full-time to running the party.  Meanwhile, other people better at getting earned media will be free to do so, and Phillies will be able to support their efforts with a well-run and effective national office.

The very things that made Root a more effective candidate than Phillies for President -- telegenic and energetic personality, ability to get all sorts of earned media -- make him somewhat of a joke as a Chair candidate.  Honestly, the more I read about it and think about it, it seems to me as if Root isn&#039;t a serious candidate for Chair.  The race is likely to be between Mark Hinkle (for the reformers) and George Phillies (for the radicals and a small segment of die-hard Phillies supporters).  I think this was a huge tactical error on Root&#039;s part, and he will come to regret this ill-advised Chair run.  A much smarter move would have been to install an ally as Chair (Aaron Starr comes to mind) who would be able to help him out in the next Presidential nomination.  The way this is going, Root not only won&#039;t have an ally, he&#039;ll have a sworn enemy running the party machinery when 2012 rolls around.  Not a smart move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Root&#8217;s ability to get media might be a reason to vote for him for the party&#8217;s Presidential nominee, but it&#8217;s not a reason to vote for him for Chair.  If Root loses the Chair election, he&#8217;ll still be running for President and he&#8217;ll still be getting all the earned media he can.  In fact, being Chair might hinder his ability to get earned media.  For instance, Bill Redpath is a very telegenic guy, and he&#8217;s gotten his fair share of earned media as Chair, but he&#8217;s arguably been hampered by his actual duties as Chair (for instance, he could have run a more effective Gubernatorial race last cycle had he been able to focus on it full-time rather than being Chair as well).</p>
<p>George Phillies won&#8217;t be getting a lot of earned media as Chair, but he&#8217;ll be devoting himself nearly full-time to running the party.  Meanwhile, other people better at getting earned media will be free to do so, and Phillies will be able to support their efforts with a well-run and effective national office.</p>
<p>The very things that made Root a more effective candidate than Phillies for President &#8212; telegenic and energetic personality, ability to get all sorts of earned media &#8212; make him somewhat of a joke as a Chair candidate.  Honestly, the more I read about it and think about it, it seems to me as if Root isn&#8217;t a serious candidate for Chair.  The race is likely to be between Mark Hinkle (for the reformers) and George Phillies (for the radicals and a small segment of die-hard Phillies supporters).  I think this was a huge tactical error on Root&#8217;s part, and he will come to regret this ill-advised Chair run.  A much smarter move would have been to install an ally as Chair (Aaron Starr comes to mind) who would be able to help him out in the next Presidential nomination.  The way this is going, Root not only won&#8217;t have an ally, he&#8217;ll have a sworn enemy running the party machinery when 2012 rolls around.  Not a smart move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solomon Drek</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-158838</link>
		<dc:creator>Solomon Drek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-158838</guid>
		<description>&quot;he is despised by the whiny do nothings because he does not pass their Libertarian Ideology Purity Test. Oh how we are a tolerant bunch.&quot;

A Party that labels itself a &quot;Party of Principle&quot; should be held to the same standard that it advertises.  Even though I am not a libertarian I wouldn&#039;t be shocked if I scored higher on a Libertarian Ideology Purity Test than a political snake-oil salesman who promotes himself as a &quot;Reagan Libertarian&quot;.

&quot;Oh by the way, how often do you think George Phillies will be invited on Fox News or other media outlets to preach LP sermon.&quot;

George Phillies will not likely ever be invited on Faux News because he doesn&#039;t suck up to the reactionary Reaganistas and Palinistas who constitute the bulk of its audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;he is despised by the whiny do nothings because he does not pass their Libertarian Ideology Purity Test. Oh how we are a tolerant bunch.&#8221;</p>
<p>A Party that labels itself a &#8220;Party of Principle&#8221; should be held to the same standard that it advertises.  Even though I am not a libertarian I wouldn&#8217;t be shocked if I scored higher on a Libertarian Ideology Purity Test than a political snake-oil salesman who promotes himself as a &#8220;Reagan Libertarian&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh by the way, how often do you think George Phillies will be invited on Fox News or other media outlets to preach LP sermon.&#8221;</p>
<p>George Phillies will not likely ever be invited on Faux News because he doesn&#8217;t suck up to the reactionary Reaganistas and Palinistas who constitute the bulk of its audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas L. Knapp</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/wayne-root-criticizes-wes-benedict-lphq-for-failing-to-post-his-media-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-158837</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas L. Knapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=12861#comment-158837</guid>
		<description>&quot;the usual suspects are attempting to purge Wayne Root and all of his supporters from the party.&quot;

The only attempted purges in the LP in the last two years have been on the LNC, and they&#039;ve been spearheaded by Root&#039;s handler, Aaron Starr, and his allies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the usual suspects are attempting to purge Wayne Root and all of his supporters from the party.&#8221;</p>
<p>The only attempted purges in the LP in the last two years have been on the LNC, and they&#8217;ve been spearheaded by Root&#8217;s handler, Aaron Starr, and his allies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

