<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boston Tea Party of Indiana opposes marriage discrimination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/</link>
	<description>Covering America's third parties and independent candidates since May 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:28:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: '..... just look at the activists ' [Lake]</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-257515</link>
		<dc:creator>'..... just look at the activists ' [Lake]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-257515</guid>
		<description>Hey, whom ever digger is, brought in the Bible. WHICH bible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, whom ever digger is, brought in the Bible. WHICH bible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-257359</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 05:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-257359</guid>
		<description>You mean we should not force our views on others? Maybe we should just let those who oppose you sodomites shoot you in the head. After all we should not force our views of morality on them now should we!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean we should not force our views on others? Maybe we should just let those who oppose you sodomites shoot you in the head. After all we should not force our views of morality on them now should we!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Grundmann, Nightingale, Quirk ..........</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-172734</link>
		<dc:creator>Dear Grundmann, Nightingale, Quirk ..........</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-172734</guid>
		<description>WHICH Bible ?????????

[Don Lake is still looking THE religious text originally written in 21st century American English .............]

WHICH Tea Party, the one Alice attended down the Rabbit Hole ?????????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHICH Bible ?????????</p>
<p>[Don Lake is still looking THE religious text originally written in 21st century American English .............]</p>
<p>WHICH Tea Party, the one Alice attended down the Rabbit Hole ?????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinger</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-172731</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-172731</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s address three of the quotations used in this article:
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. - &quot;... an injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere ...&quot;  Dr. King would never support the sanctioning of gay marriages for the simple reason that as a religious leader he pays homage to the Christian Bible, in which it clearly documents God&#039;s denouncing of homosexuality as sinful.  In the same Biblical text the two cities of Sodom and Gomorrah where it was rampant, were subsequently razed to the ground by the hand of God.  Whether you believe the Biblical Text is irrelevant, but to misuse Dr. King&#039;s words to imply he would support gay marriage employs a shocking will to deceive and an unpalpable lack of integrity.  
Ghandi - &quot;Coercion through legislation that threatens the liberty of our society is no means to encourage others to adopt the morals you hope them to subscribe to.”  To rely on this statement is simply stupid.  The banning of gay marriages does not threaten our society, if anything it preserves its morality, which is what we expect of legislation.  Ghandi, like Dr. King, was a moral man and would be horrified to see that his words have been mis-used to support an immorality.
Douglass Gaking. “Regardless of how you feel about the moral decisions of the GLBT (Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgendered) community, individuals in a free society must refrain from forcing their morals upon others.”  Agreed, however this is not about individuals here imposing their views upon others, but rather about removing legislation which the majority acknowledges protects the morality of the social fabric of our society.
The Tea Party says:  &quot;Whereas in a free society ‘marriage’ would be a private contract between individuals of no concern to the state&quot;.  Then what of the legislation outlawing bigamy?  Should that also be removed?  What of the law requiring that a person must first obtain a divorce before entering a subsequent marriage - should we remove that also?  In fact remove the Divorce Courts all together??  It is preposterous to pretend, for the sake of a means to an end - that end being to legalise gay marriages - that the State has no role in the affairs of upholding morality in the social order of things and these existing laws prove that it most certainly does.  Therefore this statement is garbage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s address three of the quotations used in this article:<br />
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. &#8211; &#8220;&#8230; an injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere &#8230;&#8221;  Dr. King would never support the sanctioning of gay marriages for the simple reason that as a religious leader he pays homage to the Christian Bible, in which it clearly documents God&#8217;s denouncing of homosexuality as sinful.  In the same Biblical text the two cities of Sodom and Gomorrah where it was rampant, were subsequently razed to the ground by the hand of God.  Whether you believe the Biblical Text is irrelevant, but to misuse Dr. King&#8217;s words to imply he would support gay marriage employs a shocking will to deceive and an unpalpable lack of integrity.<br />
Ghandi &#8211; &#8220;Coercion through legislation that threatens the liberty of our society is no means to encourage others to adopt the morals you hope them to subscribe to.”  To rely on this statement is simply stupid.  The banning of gay marriages does not threaten our society, if anything it preserves its morality, which is what we expect of legislation.  Ghandi, like Dr. King, was a moral man and would be horrified to see that his words have been mis-used to support an immorality.<br />
Douglass Gaking. “Regardless of how you feel about the moral decisions of the GLBT (Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgendered) community, individuals in a free society must refrain from forcing their morals upon others.”  Agreed, however this is not about individuals here imposing their views upon others, but rather about removing legislation which the majority acknowledges protects the morality of the social fabric of our society.<br />
The Tea Party says:  &#8220;Whereas in a free society ‘marriage’ would be a private contract between individuals of no concern to the state&#8221;.  Then what of the legislation outlawing bigamy?  Should that also be removed?  What of the law requiring that a person must first obtain a divorce before entering a subsequent marriage &#8211; should we remove that also?  In fact remove the Divorce Courts all together??  It is preposterous to pretend, for the sake of a means to an end &#8211; that end being to legalise gay marriages &#8211; that the State has no role in the affairs of upholding morality in the social order of things and these existing laws prove that it most certainly does.  Therefore this statement is garbage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-170324</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-170324</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Paulie – A poor excuse for avoiding the truth.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m not avoiding any truth.




&lt;blockquote&gt; I had presumed that you have advanced beyond Dick and Jane readers –

See Dick run.
Run Dick run.
See Jane run.
Run Jane run.
See Dick and Jane run.

Short enough?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes. 

Is this the &quot;truth&quot; you want me to address?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Paulie – A poor excuse for avoiding the truth.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not avoiding any truth.</p>
<blockquote><p> I had presumed that you have advanced beyond Dick and Jane readers –</p>
<p>See Dick run.<br />
Run Dick run.<br />
See Jane run.<br />
Run Jane run.<br />
See Dick and Jane run.</p>
<p>Short enough?</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes. </p>
<p>Is this the &#8220;truth&#8221; you want me to address?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Grundmann</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-169581</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Grundmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-169581</guid>
		<description>Paulie - A poor excuse for avoiding the truth.  I had presumed that you have advanced beyond Dick and Jane readers - 

See Dick run.  
Run Dick run.  
See Jane run.  
Run Jane run.  
See Dick and Jane run.    

Short enough?

Don J. Grundmann, D.C. Vice-Chairman American Independent Party, California branch of the Constitution Party</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paulie &#8211; A poor excuse for avoiding the truth.  I had presumed that you have advanced beyond Dick and Jane readers &#8211; </p>
<p>See Dick run.<br />
Run Dick run.<br />
See Jane run.<br />
Run Jane run.<br />
See Dick and Jane run.    </p>
<p>Short enough?</p>
<p>Don J. Grundmann, D.C. Vice-Chairman American Independent Party, California branch of the Constitution Party</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Straight .......... from Lake</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-169489</link>
		<dc:creator>Straight .......... from Lake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-169489</guid>
		<description>Lake is paulie&#039;s supporter ????????

paulie is Lake&#039;s supporter ??????????

&#039;Friendmies&#039; ???????? 

&#039;Respectful opponents&#039;  ?????????????

&#039;Semi Same Directional Type[s] ??????

but &#039;Mutual Supporters&#039; ?????????

Only that we both love the truth and 
hate Dems and GOP .........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lake is paulie&#8217;s supporter ????????</p>
<p>paulie is Lake&#8217;s supporter ??????????</p>
<p>&#8216;Friendmies&#8217; ???????? </p>
<p>&#8216;Respectful opponents&#8217;  ?????????????</p>
<p>&#8216;Semi Same Directional Type[s] ??????</p>
<p>but &#8216;Mutual Supporters&#8217; ?????????</p>
<p>Only that we both love the truth and<br />
hate Dems and GOP &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-169452</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-169452</guid>
		<description>Grundmann

1) I stand by what I said
2) Your paragraph is too long, so I didn&#039;t read it. 

Shorter paragraphs are your friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grundmann</p>
<p>1) I stand by what I said<br />
2) Your paragraph is too long, so I didn&#8217;t read it. </p>
<p>Shorter paragraphs are your friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Grundmann</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-168725</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Grundmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 05:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-168725</guid>
		<description>Third Party - While being unaware of the full text of the case which you are referring to and which I believe was regarding sodomy as compared to homosexuality the answer is Yes.

&quot; BTP, myself, and most who have commented here are pro-family, pro-children &quot;

Response - Paulie - Total BS.  Anyone who is truly pro-children/family will stop the Social Engineering/psychological warfare attacks against them which are starting in KINDERGARTEN and are completely directed by the homosexual movement/agenda.  My own ELEMENTARY SCHOOL alma-mater now has a Gay-Straight Alliance Club.  The KINDERGARTENERS are already being attacked by psychological warfare tactics.  When you defend those attacks you simply expose yourself as an enemy of children and families.  Don&#039;t sugar coat your opposition to them and/or pretend to be anything else.   Simply &quot; come out of the closet &quot; and declare yourself as their enemy since the whole idea of the attacks is to destroy the traditional family and children by sexualizing them at the earliest age possible.   In earlier days ( when the nation and citizens were not so sick ) NO ONE would defend molestors and attacks upon children as such actions were natually understood to be only done by sick minds and sick people.  Fast forward to our time where you, Lake, and all of the other clowns on just this and other threads rush to the defense of perverts and their attacks upon children while casting such sickness under the fake cover of &quot; freedom,&quot; &quot; the Bill of Rights,&quot; &quot; equal protection clause,&quot; yada, yada, yada.   As John Adams said the Constitution was founded for a moral people.  The founding fathers did not write the Constitution to promote sodomy to our children - STARTING IN KINDERGARTEN - and the future generations.  I could say you should be ashamed but I know that for you, Lake, and your fellow supporters such sentiments have no chance against the ego stroking that you give yourself with your promotion of attacks upon the foundations of our nation - the family unit and the children who are your targets.  You, as with the others, lost your shame a long time ago.    

Don J. Grundmann, D.C. Vice-Chairman American Independent Party, California branch of the Constitution Party</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Third Party &#8211; While being unaware of the full text of the case which you are referring to and which I believe was regarding sodomy as compared to homosexuality the answer is Yes.</p>
<p>&#8221; BTP, myself, and most who have commented here are pro-family, pro-children &#8221;</p>
<p>Response &#8211; Paulie &#8211; Total BS.  Anyone who is truly pro-children/family will stop the Social Engineering/psychological warfare attacks against them which are starting in KINDERGARTEN and are completely directed by the homosexual movement/agenda.  My own ELEMENTARY SCHOOL alma-mater now has a Gay-Straight Alliance Club.  The KINDERGARTENERS are already being attacked by psychological warfare tactics.  When you defend those attacks you simply expose yourself as an enemy of children and families.  Don&#8217;t sugar coat your opposition to them and/or pretend to be anything else.   Simply &#8221; come out of the closet &#8221; and declare yourself as their enemy since the whole idea of the attacks is to destroy the traditional family and children by sexualizing them at the earliest age possible.   In earlier days ( when the nation and citizens were not so sick ) NO ONE would defend molestors and attacks upon children as such actions were natually understood to be only done by sick minds and sick people.  Fast forward to our time where you, Lake, and all of the other clowns on just this and other threads rush to the defense of perverts and their attacks upon children while casting such sickness under the fake cover of &#8221; freedom,&#8221; &#8221; the Bill of Rights,&#8221; &#8221; equal protection clause,&#8221; yada, yada, yada.   As John Adams said the Constitution was founded for a moral people.  The founding fathers did not write the Constitution to promote sodomy to our children &#8211; STARTING IN KINDERGARTEN &#8211; and the future generations.  I could say you should be ashamed but I know that for you, Lake, and your fellow supporters such sentiments have no chance against the ego stroking that you give yourself with your promotion of attacks upon the foundations of our nation &#8211; the family unit and the children who are your targets.  You, as with the others, lost your shame a long time ago.    </p>
<p>Don J. Grundmann, D.C. Vice-Chairman American Independent Party, California branch of the Constitution Party</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Third Party Revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-168699</link>
		<dc:creator>Third Party Revolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 02:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-168699</guid>
		<description>So Don G, just wondering. Even though it is ruled unconstitutional to do so, would you support a re-criminalization of homosexuality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Don G, just wondering. Even though it is ruled unconstitutional to do so, would you support a re-criminalization of homosexuality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Lake ........... perfect, just too perfect!</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-164462</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Lake ........... perfect, just too perfect!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-164462</guid>
		<description>Don Grundmann  // Feb 22, 2010:
” The Last Conservative : Thank you for your comment ...... I am happy to read of another defender &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don Grundmann  // Feb 22, 2010:<br />
” The Last Conservative : Thank you for your comment &#8230;&#8230; I am happy to read of another defender &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-164461</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-164461</guid>
		<description>Grundmann

1. You are anti-family, anti-chldren.
2. BTP, myself, and most who have commented here are pro-family, pro-children
3. LP has been doing tax day protests - some with tea party themes - since at least the 1980s. 
4. BTP has been around since 2006
5. Rick Santelli, who started the curret &quot;tea parties,&quot; got his idea directly from the Illinois LP, as documented previously on IPR. 
6. So if anyone is &quot;hijacking&quot; the tea parties - it isn&#039;t the libertarians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grundmann</p>
<p>1. You are anti-family, anti-chldren.<br />
2. BTP, myself, and most who have commented here are pro-family, pro-children<br />
3. LP has been doing tax day protests &#8211; some with tea party themes &#8211; since at least the 1980s.<br />
4. BTP has been around since 2006<br />
5. Rick Santelli, who started the curret &#8220;tea parties,&#8221; got his idea directly from the Illinois LP, as documented previously on IPR.<br />
6. So if anyone is &#8220;hijacking&#8221; the tea parties &#8211; it isn&#8217;t the libertarians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Grundmann</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-164458</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Grundmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-164458</guid>
		<description>&quot; Just take a couple more steps and you won’t be an anti-monarchist commie anymore.&quot;

Response - The Last Conservative :  Thank you for your comment although I did not realize that I was an &quot; anti-monarchist commie.&quot;  I am happy to read of another defender of the family and children since, as you can see, there are oodles of their attackers at this forum.  I hope that you are correct regarding the arm-chair bathrobed Libertarians being behind the disgrace of a &quot; Tea Party &quot; endorsement of perversion even if they have hijacked the name and/or organization in order to spread their poison.  Unfortunately a little of such infection/poison can go a long way so I hope that the legitimate/real Tea Party organizations around the nation protect themselves from being polluted/destroyed by attacks from such rodents.  

Don J. Grundmann, D.C. Vice-Chairman American Independent Party, California branch of the Constitution Party</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Just take a couple more steps and you won’t be an anti-monarchist commie anymore.&#8221;</p>
<p>Response &#8211; The Last Conservative :  Thank you for your comment although I did not realize that I was an &#8221; anti-monarchist commie.&#8221;  I am happy to read of another defender of the family and children since, as you can see, there are oodles of their attackers at this forum.  I hope that you are correct regarding the arm-chair bathrobed Libertarians being behind the disgrace of a &#8221; Tea Party &#8221; endorsement of perversion even if they have hijacked the name and/or organization in order to spread their poison.  Unfortunately a little of such infection/poison can go a long way so I hope that the legitimate/real Tea Party organizations around the nation protect themselves from being polluted/destroyed by attacks from such rodents.  </p>
<p>Don J. Grundmann, D.C. Vice-Chairman American Independent Party, California branch of the Constitution Party</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Lake ........... ??????</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-164386</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Lake ........... ??????</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-164386</guid>
		<description>It has been an evolution, a steady down ward spiral from being semi reasonable [2004] and merely an odd ball (aren&#039;t we all .......) to being some one at loose ends with day to day reality. 

I have [abet second and third hand] info that he is a medical person whom literally believes in the Bible, a STRICT &#039;creationist&#039; and anti science [including Genetics and pharmaceuticals] ..........

Thin, good looking, passionate [and promoted by me per the Reform Party of California in 2004] he is literally falling apart ----- or at least going &#039;tangential&#039;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been an evolution, a steady down ward spiral from being semi reasonable [2004] and merely an odd ball (aren&#8217;t we all &#8230;&#8230;.) to being some one at loose ends with day to day reality. </p>
<p>I have [abet second and third hand] info that he is a medical person whom literally believes in the Bible, a STRICT &#8216;creationist&#8217; and anti science [including Genetics and pharmaceuticals] &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Thin, good looking, passionate [and promoted by me per the Reform Party of California in 2004] he is literally falling apart &#8212;&#8211; or at least going &#8216;tangential&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Milligan</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-164369</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Milligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-164369</guid>
		<description>Iv&#039;e seen Don Grundmann demontrating in California against equal rights for all.  He carries signs that read gay=pervert and hangs with the Otterstad gang of inbred morons.  I put him in the same class as Fred Phelps and family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iv&#8217;e seen Don Grundmann demontrating in California against equal rights for all.  He carries signs that read gay=pervert and hangs with the Otterstad gang of inbred morons.  I put him in the same class as Fred Phelps and family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-164216</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 06:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-164216</guid>
		<description>BTP&#039;s release is pro-family. Grundmann&#039;s anti-family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTP&#8217;s release is pro-family. Grundmann&#8217;s anti-family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Last Conservative</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-164074</link>
		<dc:creator>The Last Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-164074</guid>
		<description>Grundman, this isn&#039;t the Tea Party movement that you&#039;re thinking of. The Boston Tea Party is just a few hundred libertarians sitting on Internet forums. The tea party movement that is getting all the media coverage, is mostly pro-family.

Keep up your pro-family crusade, you are doing a great job. Just take a couple more steps and you won&#039;t be an anti-monarchist commie anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grundman, this isn&#8217;t the Tea Party movement that you&#8217;re thinking of. The Boston Tea Party is just a few hundred libertarians sitting on Internet forums. The tea party movement that is getting all the media coverage, is mostly pro-family.</p>
<p>Keep up your pro-family crusade, you are doing a great job. Just take a couple more steps and you won&#8217;t be an anti-monarchist commie anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Lake ........... ??????</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-163987</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Lake ........... ??????</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-163987</guid>
		<description>LibertarianGirl  // Feb 21, 2010:
&quot;Thank god he is childless , I guess his G*D and Nature herself knows what a tool he is! &quot;

Really, he was semi reasonable in 2004 ......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LibertarianGirl  // Feb 21, 2010:<br />
&#8220;Thank god he is childless , I guess his G*D and Nature herself knows what a tool he is! &#8221;</p>
<p>Really, he was semi reasonable in 2004 &#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inDglass</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-163975</link>
		<dc:creator>inDglass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-163975</guid>
		<description>Me too. The LPIN is better at getting media attention than the BTPIN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me too. The LPIN is better at getting media attention than the BTPIN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Geib</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/02/boston-tea-party-of-indiana-opposes-marriage-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-163970</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Geib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=13277#comment-163970</guid>
		<description>Go BTP! I hope the LPIN follows suit with a similar release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go BTP! I hope the LPIN follows suit with a similar release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

