<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tom Knapp, Darryl Perry, Paulie (and you?): &#8216;Not my debt&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/12/tom-knapp-darryl-perry-paulie-and-you-not-my-debt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/12/tom-knapp-darryl-perry-paulie-and-you-not-my-debt/</link>
	<description>Covering America's third parties and independent candidates since May 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:08:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas L. Knapp</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/12/tom-knapp-darryl-perry-paulie-and-you-not-my-debt/comment-page-1/#comment-146483</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas L. Knapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=11877#comment-146483</guid>
		<description>Mik,

Yes, it is a &quot;stopgap.&quot; Most increases in the debt ceiling are.

The politicians like to portray each debt ceiling increase as an &quot;emergency measure, while we work on getting the fiscal situation under control.&quot; Followed, of course, every few months by another such &quot;emergency measure, while we ...&quot;

I think that it was Clausewitz who pointed out that in war, &quot;the important things are simple, but the simple things are hard.&quot;

That maxim is fully applicable to government budgets. Solving &quot;the deficit problem&quot; and &quot;the debt problem&quot; is simple: All Congress has to do is not spend any more money than it takes in. 

That&#039;s not complicated, but it is hard, because each and every spending measure has its advocates who will scream bloody murder if &quot;their&quot; program doesn&#039;t get unlimited money, while few spending measures have opponents who are as dedicated to opposing the expenditures as the supporters are to getting them.

A year or so ago, Brian Holtz thought he&#039;d have a laugh at my expense when I suggested that the &quot;national debt&quot; would never be paid off, informing me that nobody &quot;serious&quot; would suggest such a thing. Only a year or so later, the &quot;mainstream&quot; is openly mocking the idea that the debt will be paid. The only real question left is how the default will be structured and handled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mik,</p>
<p>Yes, it is a &#8220;stopgap.&#8221; Most increases in the debt ceiling are.</p>
<p>The politicians like to portray each debt ceiling increase as an &#8220;emergency measure, while we work on getting the fiscal situation under control.&#8221; Followed, of course, every few months by another such &#8220;emergency measure, while we &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I think that it was Clausewitz who pointed out that in war, &#8220;the important things are simple, but the simple things are hard.&#8221;</p>
<p>That maxim is fully applicable to government budgets. Solving &#8220;the deficit problem&#8221; and &#8220;the debt problem&#8221; is simple: All Congress has to do is not spend any more money than it takes in. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s not complicated, but it is hard, because each and every spending measure has its advocates who will scream bloody murder if &#8220;their&#8221; program doesn&#8217;t get unlimited money, while few spending measures have opponents who are as dedicated to opposing the expenditures as the supporters are to getting them.</p>
<p>A year or so ago, Brian Holtz thought he&#8217;d have a laugh at my expense when I suggested that the &#8220;national debt&#8221; would never be paid off, informing me that nobody &#8220;serious&#8221; would suggest such a thing. Only a year or so later, the &#8220;mainstream&#8221; is openly mocking the idea that the debt will be paid. The only real question left is how the default will be structured and handled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/12/tom-knapp-darryl-perry-paulie-and-you-not-my-debt/comment-page-1/#comment-146456</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=11877#comment-146456</guid>
		<description>No one besides me, Darryl and Tom? I&#039;m surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one besides me, Darryl and Tom? I&#8217;m surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mik Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/12/tom-knapp-darryl-perry-paulie-and-you-not-my-debt/comment-page-1/#comment-145985</link>
		<dc:creator>Mik Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=11877#comment-145985</guid>
		<description>Apparently this will only resolve the debt issue for a short time. Congress also adopted legislation to give Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac a blank check for bailout funds. They must have been working especially hard over the holiday. Perhaps they deserve a pay raise so they have a salary they can live on, along with good health care coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently this will only resolve the debt issue for a short time. Congress also adopted legislation to give Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac a blank check for bailout funds. They must have been working especially hard over the holiday. Perhaps they deserve a pay raise so they have a salary they can live on, along with good health care coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

