Posted at Poli-Tea:
In the race leading up to the special election for US Senate in Massachusetts, the structure of the contest’s upcoming debates has become a point of contention between Democrat Martha Coakley and Republican Scott Brown. The Boston Globe reports:
Coakley, the state’s attorney general, said she is reluctant to participate in any debates that do not include a little-known independent candidate, Joseph L. Kennedy. Most of the invitations Brown accepted are for debates that do not include Kennedy; six are scheduled during a nine-day period, and most are sponsored by media outlets.
Joe Kennedy is an independent libertarian and gathered the necessary petition signatures to qualify for ballot access last month. For his part, Kennedy is eager to confront Coakley and Brown in any and all debates. As noted by The Senator at Kennedy Seat, who is following this race very closely, the Brown campaign has now effectively “shifted the onus to the various debate sponsors.” But the Boston Globe article above quotes Coakley saying:
“It shouldn’t be two people in some debates, three in other debates,’’ she added. “I think everybody should be included, and I think we’re going to hold pretty firm on that.’’
[...] Joe Kennedy has found an unlikely ally in the Democratic candidate. The question remains as to how debate sponsors will react to these developments. As it is in their best interests to do so, the people of Massachusetts should demand the inclusion of voices independent of the Democratic-Republican duopoly system of government.
Some recent New England Cable News reports
7 responses so far ↓
1 Adrian Scott // Dec 16, 2009 at 4:30 am
What I’ve read from Joe Kennedy recently, he seems to be really pressing his luck, calling Democrats and Republicans two sides to the same coin and all. Not that fiery rhetoric denouncing the two party plutocracy isn’t always fun, but don’t do it when you’re asking for a ticket to the debates.
2 Boston Globe lobbies against 3-candidate debate | Independent Political Report // Dec 16, 2009 at 7:26 am
[...] Workers Party commander Bill White on trial in federal court for intimidationAdrian Scott on Massachusetts Special Election: the Debate on the DebatesAdrian Scott on Update on Modern Whig Party state chapters: Florida, California, New York, [...]
3 paulie // Dec 16, 2009 at 12:58 pm
Actually, that’s the best reason to be included in debates. If the Republicans and Democrats truly represented “both” sides of the argument, there would be no need for alternative and independent candidates.
4 Ben // Dec 16, 2009 at 1:53 pm
Paulie’s right. Besides, such “fiery rhetoric” is nothing for a race like this in MA. Politics is blood sport here.
5 IPR compendium: Joe Kennedy posts to date | Independent Political Report // Dec 18, 2009 at 10:59 am
[...] Massachusetts Special Election: the Debate on the Debates Posted by Paulie, 12/15 [...]
6 Green Party issues press release to support Libertarian Joe Kennedy’s right to debate | Independent Political Report // Dec 19, 2009 at 9:16 am
[...] Massachusetts Special Election: the Debate on the Debates Posted by Paulie, 12/15 [...]
7 Joe Kennedy - 2009 post archive | Independent Political Report // Jan 7, 2010 at 5:11 pm
[...] Massachusetts Special Election: the Debate on the Debates Posted by Paulie, 12/15 [...]
Leave a Comment