Comments on: Independent candidate for Senate in CT stars in ad, creates controversy

By: paulie

paulie — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:49:53 +0000

IGP has also been caught by GPW posting under the names of candidates they “endorsed” (sometimes without those candidates’ knowledge, much less approval). The same names showed up at IPR.

By: Don Lake .......... Other non Domestic News

Don Lake .......... Other non Domestic News — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:05:30 +0000

Mike Indiana // Dec 10, 2009:
“Green Party Fan (AKA – “Virginia Green” Independent Greens of Virginia),
Please stop putting words in peoples mouths and, telling lies.”

——- Thank you

By: Mike Indiana

Mike Indiana — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:39:10 +0000

Green Party Fan (AKA – “Virginia Green” Independent Greens of Virginia),

Please stop putting words in peoples mouths and, telling lies.

“Vaugh’s idea for joining the Green Party and giving the Nader the ballot line for Senate another outstanding idea.”

Where do you get that from!!!!! Vaugh never mentioned the Green Party !!!! It is very clear that the article and Vaugh’s comment refered to the Connecticut for Lieberman Party.

Intentional false truths such as your comment, here and elsewhere while only minor fibs (you’ve already been caught telling big lies on IPR) over time and strung together these false truths (half-truths at best) only paint yourself and third party activists in a negative light.

In the future please refrain from attributing comments to people which were never said.

Here is an example of your privious lies and half truths. http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/11/green-party-victories-around-the-country/

By: Green Party fan

Green Party fan — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:01:42 +0000

Vaugh’s idea for joining the Green Party and giving the Nader the ballot line for Senate another outstanding idea.

By: Green Party fan

Green Party fan — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:00:18 +0000

If Nader doesn’t run for the Green Party, this fellow would make a good Green Party pick.

By: Vaughn

Vaughn — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:07:02 +0000

Is this even relevant to be ironic when Joe isn’t running for Lieberman next year?

Back to Nader…is the CFL going to have a primary next year?

By: Citizen1

Citizen1 — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:47:55 +0000

Liberman qualified the CFL Party for the next US Senate election (2010). If Mertens gets 1% of the vote on the CFL line it will have ballot access for US Senate to run a canidate against Lieberman. They must run a candidate or they lose the access and if Mertens is on the ballot for more than one party only those on that parties line count toward ballot access. The CFL party also has ballot access for some state senate and house districts and a suspect that they will petition for more. They we aligned with the Independent Party that ran Nader for President in the 2008 election.

By: Trent Hill

Trent Hill — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:09:24 +0000

The party was founded by Lieberman in 2006, Morgan, to run for Senate, after Lieberman lost the Democratic nomination for Senate to Ned Lamont. Lieberman then won, qualifying the party for the next election (or two? Richard?).

Now anti-Lieberman activists have taken over and utilizing it ironically.

By: Morgan Brykein

Morgan Brykein — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:16:39 +0000

I suppose they’re using “Connecticut for Lieberman” as an ironic title?

By: Vaughn

Vaughn — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:28:22 +0000

How about just giving that ballot line to Nader as well?

By: Ross Levin

Ross Levin — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:50:58 +0000

I’m skeptical of the claim that the party would cease to exist if they didn’t get 1% of the Senate vote. If I remember correctly, Connecticut has laws that allow a party to qualify for the ballot locally, even if they don’t have statewide ballot access. If this is the case, then the party wouldn’t even need statewide ballot access if their intention is to run local candidates.