<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ballot Access News: Springfield, Massachusetts Newspaper Opposes Inclusive U.S. Senate Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/12/ballot-access-news-springfield-massachusetts-newspaper-opposes-inclusive-us-senate-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/12/ballot-access-news-springfield-massachusetts-newspaper-opposes-inclusive-us-senate-debate/</link>
	<description>Covering America's third parties and independent candidates since May 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:34:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Kennedy - 2009 post archive &#124; Independent Political Report</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/12/ballot-access-news-springfield-massachusetts-newspaper-opposes-inclusive-us-senate-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-147821</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Kennedy - 2009 post archive &#124; Independent Political Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=11396#comment-147821</guid>
		<description>[...] Ballot Access News: Springfield, Massachusetts Newspaper Opposes Inclusive U.S. Senate Debate Posted by Paulie, 12/17 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ballot Access News: Springfield, Massachusetts Newspaper Opposes Inclusive U.S. Senate Debate Posted by Paulie, 12/17 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IPR compendium: Joe Kennedy posts to date &#124; Independent Political Report</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/12/ballot-access-news-springfield-massachusetts-newspaper-opposes-inclusive-us-senate-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-143371</link>
		<dc:creator>IPR compendium: Joe Kennedy posts to date &#124; Independent Political Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=11396#comment-143371</guid>
		<description>[...] Ballot Access News: Springfield, Massachusetts Newspaper Opposes Inclusive U.S. Senate Debate Posted by Paulie, 12/17 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ballot Access News: Springfield, Massachusetts Newspaper Opposes Inclusive U.S. Senate Debate Posted by Paulie, 12/17 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Lake .......... Third Party Change Needed</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/12/ballot-access-news-springfield-massachusetts-newspaper-opposes-inclusive-us-senate-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-143051</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Lake .......... Third Party Change Needed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=11396#comment-143051</guid>
		<description>More proof of the anti competitive political environment of a decaying fascist imperial global empire. How sad, how sad .........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More proof of the anti competitive political environment of a decaying fascist imperial global empire. How sad, how sad &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mik Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/12/ballot-access-news-springfield-massachusetts-newspaper-opposes-inclusive-us-senate-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-143027</link>
		<dc:creator>Mik Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=11396#comment-143027</guid>
		<description>I wonder why it is so important for only the two &quot;major&quot; candidates to go head to head in debate. It is not like there will only be one other Senator they have to debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why it is so important for only the two &#8220;major&#8221; candidates to go head to head in debate. It is not like there will only be one other Senator they have to debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

