<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: South Carolina Green Party Case Moves Ahead in 4th Circuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/south-carolina-green-party-case-moves-ahead-in-4th-circuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/south-carolina-green-party-case-moves-ahead-in-4th-circuit/</link>
	<description>Covering America's third parties and independent candidates since May 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:28:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/south-carolina-green-party-case-moves-ahead-in-4th-circuit/comment-page-1/#comment-106943</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10280#comment-106943</guid>
		<description>Although I am no longer a member of the GP, I am proud to have been at, and voted in the convention that gave Eugene the nomination. 

This case is basically a challenge to the &quot;sore loser&quot; law. This was intended to prevent people who lost a primary to run under another party banner, or as a write in/petition candidate,  after losing a primary. In this case the GP nominated Eugene BEFORE the democratic primary. By denying ballot access Green Party members and supporters of the party and Eugene were disenfranchised. 

Good Luck Eugene!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I am no longer a member of the GP, I am proud to have been at, and voted in the convention that gave Eugene the nomination. </p>
<p>This case is basically a challenge to the &#8220;sore loser&#8221; law. This was intended to prevent people who lost a primary to run under another party banner, or as a write in/petition candidate,  after losing a primary. In this case the GP nominated Eugene BEFORE the democratic primary. By denying ballot access Green Party members and supporters of the party and Eugene were disenfranchised. </p>
<p>Good Luck Eugene!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

