<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard Winger of Ballot Access News critiques Top-Two proposal in California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/richard-winger-of-ballot-access-news-critiques-top-two-proposal-in-california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/richard-winger-of-ballot-access-news-critiques-top-two-proposal-in-california/</link>
	<description>Covering America's third parties and independent candidates since May 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:58:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melty</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/richard-winger-of-ballot-access-news-critiques-top-two-proposal-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-99516</link>
		<dc:creator>Melty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=9837#comment-99516</guid>
		<description>For a state the size of California, you definitely want summablity, and most any method other than &quot;instant runoff&quot; gives you that.

Perhaps most worrisome is how IRV incentivizes electronic voting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a state the size of California, you definitely want summablity, and most any method other than &#8220;instant runoff&#8221; gives you that.</p>
<p>Perhaps most worrisome is how IRV incentivizes electronic voting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melty</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/richard-winger-of-ballot-access-news-critiques-top-two-proposal-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-99489</link>
		<dc:creator>Melty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 15:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=9837#comment-99489</guid>
		<description>1 - 4 are superb work, business as usual for Richard Winger.
5 is a bad idea. No elimination and reallocation system is desirable for a single winner election. There are other methods, though, with independence of clones and irrelevant alternatives or monotonicity that could provide a just means of bypassing primaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 &#8211; 4 are superb work, business as usual for Richard Winger.<br />
5 is a bad idea. No elimination and reallocation system is desirable for a single winner election. There are other methods, though, with independence of clones and irrelevant alternatives or monotonicity that could provide a just means of bypassing primaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

