<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John R. Rarick Dies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/</link>
	<description>Covering America's third parties and independent candidates since May 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:28:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/comment-page-1/#comment-104153</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody Quirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10089#comment-104153</guid>
		<description>My point was that after Wallace built the AIP into a national party, it’s amazing that this long string of big names couldn’t sustain that.

= Because those big names abandoned the Party afterwards. And the national AIP was brought down by a few bad apples from the JBS that wanted to &#039;purify&#039; it from the populist atmosphere and instigated in-fighting.

-Sorta like the theocratic kooks that joined the CP in the late 90&#039;s and tried to do the same thing, even tried kicking Mormons and other non-protestants out of the CP, but they lost and left soon afterward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point was that after Wallace built the AIP into a national party, it’s amazing that this long string of big names couldn’t sustain that.</p>
<p>= Because those big names abandoned the Party afterwards. And the national AIP was brought down by a few bad apples from the JBS that wanted to &#8216;purify&#8217; it from the populist atmosphere and instigated in-fighting.</p>
<p>-Sorta like the theocratic kooks that joined the CP in the late 90&#8242;s and tried to do the same thing, even tried kicking Mormons and other non-protestants out of the CP, but they lost and left soon afterward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/comment-page-1/#comment-104075</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10089#comment-104075</guid>
		<description>I think that is largely becasue of the participation, over there,  by Peter Gemma and Gary Odom--both old school guys who were THERE back in the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that is largely becasue of the participation, over there,  by Peter Gemma and Gary Odom&#8211;both old school guys who were THERE back in the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/comment-page-1/#comment-104062</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10089#comment-104062</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;There is an interesting discussion of this fella going on at Ballot Access News. &lt;/i&gt;

Yes, indeed. 

And, unlike most times when we repost BAN articles, they are getting way more comments over there, at least so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>There is an interesting discussion of this fella going on at Ballot Access News. </i></p>
<p>Yes, indeed. </p>
<p>And, unlike most times when we repost BAN articles, they are getting way more comments over there, at least so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Winger</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/comment-page-1/#comment-103978</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Winger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10089#comment-103978</guid>
		<description>Schmitz would have had a far better vote if he hadn&#039;t been off the ballot in 19 states, including big states like New York, Texas, Florida, and Illinois.  Also he wasn&#039;t on in certain states that would have given him a very big percentage, like Nevada and Wyoming and South Dakota.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Schmitz would have had a far better vote if he hadn&#8217;t been off the ballot in 19 states, including big states like New York, Texas, Florida, and Illinois.  Also he wasn&#8217;t on in certain states that would have given him a very big percentage, like Nevada and Wyoming and South Dakota.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/comment-page-1/#comment-103730</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10089#comment-103730</guid>
		<description>Humble,

I dont know, but I hope so. I had an opportunity to meet Rarick and he was a very interesting man. 

I told Gemma, on the Ballot Access page, that I&#039;d once had plans to write a book on far right third parties since WWII--but i&#039;d since put off those plans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humble,</p>
<p>I dont know, but I hope so. I had an opportunity to meet Rarick and he was a very interesting man. </p>
<p>I told Gemma, on the Ballot Access page, that I&#8217;d once had plans to write a book on far right third parties since WWII&#8211;but i&#8217;d since put off those plans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HumbleTravis</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/comment-page-1/#comment-103711</link>
		<dc:creator>HumbleTravis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10089#comment-103711</guid>
		<description>Is Peter Gemma still working on the John Rarick book?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Peter Gemma still working on the John Rarick book?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Berkman</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/comment-page-1/#comment-103671</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Berkman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10089#comment-103671</guid>
		<description>In 1972, John Schmitz suffered from lack of money and division within the ranks of the parties that came out of the Wallace campaign.

Schmitz did badly in the South - his highest vote in the South was 5% in Louisiana, where he had been endorsed by Congressman Rarick. He was not on the ballot in Georgia, Florida or Texas, all of which had active far right groups.

At the same time, Schmitz was not a particularly good campaigner. I went to a Schmitz rally in Culver City, and barely stayed awake when Schmitz spoke. Tom Anderson was a better speaker, but even more obscure.

The only area of strength for Schmitz was the far west and the Rocky Mountain states, where he got votes from Republicans disenchanted with Nixon. But fear of McGovern caused many conservatives to vote for Nixon, and fear of Nixon caused some libertarians to vote for McGovern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1972, John Schmitz suffered from lack of money and division within the ranks of the parties that came out of the Wallace campaign.</p>
<p>Schmitz did badly in the South &#8211; his highest vote in the South was 5% in Louisiana, where he had been endorsed by Congressman Rarick. He was not on the ballot in Georgia, Florida or Texas, all of which had active far right groups.</p>
<p>At the same time, Schmitz was not a particularly good campaigner. I went to a Schmitz rally in Culver City, and barely stayed awake when Schmitz spoke. Tom Anderson was a better speaker, but even more obscure.</p>
<p>The only area of strength for Schmitz was the far west and the Rocky Mountain states, where he got votes from Republicans disenchanted with Nixon. But fear of McGovern caused many conservatives to vote for Nixon, and fear of Nixon caused some libertarians to vote for McGovern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Young</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/comment-page-1/#comment-103665</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10089#comment-103665</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think running a congressman for the Presidency is a good option for a third party.  Historically it has yielded very poor results, as the campaigns of William Lemke, Benjamin Butler, Bob Barr, and Ron Paul (1988) can attest.  A Senator is different, but assuming you&#039;re talking about Bob Smith, he might suffer from the &quot;old kook&quot; syndrome that derailed Mike Gravel last cycle.

A far better strategy for the CP would be to run someone who has not held particularly important political office, but who nevertheless possesses a national profile.  The holy grail here is Roy Moore, but there are other attractive options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think running a congressman for the Presidency is a good option for a third party.  Historically it has yielded very poor results, as the campaigns of William Lemke, Benjamin Butler, Bob Barr, and Ron Paul (1988) can attest.  A Senator is different, but assuming you&#8217;re talking about Bob Smith, he might suffer from the &#8220;old kook&#8221; syndrome that derailed Mike Gravel last cycle.</p>
<p>A far better strategy for the CP would be to run someone who has not held particularly important political office, but who nevertheless possesses a national profile.  The holy grail here is Roy Moore, but there are other attractive options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Young</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/comment-page-1/#comment-103661</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10089#comment-103661</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t mean to compare McKinney with Schmitz, Wallace, or Gilchrist.  Gilchrist essentially ran as a member of the Constitution Party.

My point was that after Wallace built the AIP into a national party, it&#039;s amazing that this long string of big names couldn&#039;t sustain that.  It would be as if Perot really had yielded to Dick Lamm in 1996, only to see Lamm fail to crack 5% in the general election.  Numbers like Schmitz&#039;s are impressive by today&#039;s standards, but they also show a party in precipitous decline.  The Constitution Party has done far better party-building work with nonentities like Peroutka and Baldwin than the AIP did with governors and congressmen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t mean to compare McKinney with Schmitz, Wallace, or Gilchrist.  Gilchrist essentially ran as a member of the Constitution Party.</p>
<p>My point was that after Wallace built the AIP into a national party, it&#8217;s amazing that this long string of big names couldn&#8217;t sustain that.  It would be as if Perot really had yielded to Dick Lamm in 1996, only to see Lamm fail to crack 5% in the general election.  Numbers like Schmitz&#8217;s are impressive by today&#8217;s standards, but they also show a party in precipitous decline.  The Constitution Party has done far better party-building work with nonentities like Peroutka and Baldwin than the AIP did with governors and congressmen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/comment-page-1/#comment-103659</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10089#comment-103659</guid>
		<description>Jeremy,

Im actually somewhat surprised that the modern CP has not run a single former Congressman--many of them are interested in doing just that. I know 4 former congressmen, and a former senator, who would run if they were approached and given the backing of the party. Then there is Alan Keyes (who is obviously not very popular, but im just talking big-names here) and a number of higher profile businessmen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy,</p>
<p>Im actually somewhat surprised that the modern CP has not run a single former Congressman&#8211;many of them are interested in doing just that. I know 4 former congressmen, and a former senator, who would run if they were approached and given the backing of the party. Then there is Alan Keyes (who is obviously not very popular, but im just talking big-names here) and a number of higher profile businessmen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/comment-page-1/#comment-103657</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10089#comment-103657</guid>
		<description>Cynthia McKinney scored only 180,000 votes, about 1/9th of what Schmitz scored. 

Let&#039;s not forget that one of the party guys associated with the AIP was George Wallace himself--who scored 9 million + votes. Jim Gilchrist did better in his race for Congress in &#039;05 than any Green Party candidate has done in a three way race, I believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cynthia McKinney scored only 180,000 votes, about 1/9th of what Schmitz scored. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not forget that one of the party guys associated with the AIP was George Wallace himself&#8211;who scored 9 million + votes. Jim Gilchrist did better in his race for Congress in &#8217;05 than any Green Party candidate has done in a three way race, I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Young</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/comment-page-1/#comment-103653</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10089#comment-103653</guid>
		<description>The interesting thing is that even with all of these big names, none of them performed well at all at the polls.  Cynthia McKinney did much better than most of them.  Even Schmitz vastly underperformed what most people would have expected.

If these guys were still around and ran as Constitution Party candidates, they would do much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interesting thing is that even with all of these big names, none of them performed well at all at the polls.  Cynthia McKinney did much better than most of them.  Even Schmitz vastly underperformed what most people would have expected.</p>
<p>If these guys were still around and ran as Constitution Party candidates, they would do much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/comment-page-1/#comment-103648</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10089#comment-103648</guid>
		<description>It is odd to think of all the major names associated with the AIP over the years. Gov. Lester Maddox, Rep. John G. Schmitz, Rep. John Rarick, Rep. Bob Dornan, and many others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is odd to think of all the major names associated with the AIP over the years. Gov. Lester Maddox, Rep. John G. Schmitz, Rep. John Rarick, Rep. Bob Dornan, and many others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Third Party Revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/comment-page-1/#comment-103645</link>
		<dc:creator>Third Party Revolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10089#comment-103645</guid>
		<description>RIP Mr. Rarick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIP Mr. Rarick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/comment-page-1/#comment-103633</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10089#comment-103633</guid>
		<description>There is an interesting discussion of this fella going on at Ballot Access News. Peter Gemma has some interesting facts to offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an interesting discussion of this fella going on at Ballot Access News. Peter Gemma has some interesting facts to offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/comment-page-1/#comment-103627</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10089#comment-103627</guid>
		<description>I was thinking the same question...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking the same question&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Young</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/comment-page-1/#comment-103626</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10089#comment-103626</guid>
		<description>How could the Democrats strip Rarick of his seniority when he was a freshman Congressman?  Did they just stop him from accruing seniority after that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could the Democrats strip Rarick of his seniority when he was a freshman Congressman?  Did they just stop him from accruing seniority after that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/comment-page-1/#comment-103621</link>
		<dc:creator>John C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10089#comment-103621</guid>
		<description>How many prominent Libertarians are going to be eulogizing this guy and his principled support of States Rights and George Wallace?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many prominent Libertarians are going to be eulogizing this guy and his principled support of States Rights and George Wallace?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Berkman</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/09/john-r-rarick-dies/comment-page-1/#comment-103611</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Berkman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=10089#comment-103611</guid>
		<description>Wikipedia reports:
&quot;Both Rarick and his 1966 Republican opponent, Crayton G. &quot;Sparky&quot; Hall, later left their major parties. Hall was in 1976 a Sixth Congressional District elector for the fledgling Libertarian Party, pledged that year to the Virginian Roger MacBride.&quot;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_R._Rarick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia reports:<br />
&#8220;Both Rarick and his 1966 Republican opponent, Crayton G. &#8220;Sparky&#8221; Hall, later left their major parties. Hall was in 1976 a Sixth Congressional District elector for the fledgling Libertarian Party, pledged that year to the Virginian Roger MacBride.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_R._Rarick" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_R._Rarick</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

