Comments on: Wisconsin Constitution Party chair defends party’s endorsement of Republican

By: Melty

Melty — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 06:50:20 +0000

I’m finding that the Constitution Party in Wisconsin has candidates of its own that are more interventionist than this Republican Mielke. Has noninterventionism been dropped from the CP’s list of priorities?

By: allforsmiles

allforsmiles — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:46:34 +0000

that is really some bs. I think that the constitutional party should continue to endorse thier own candidates. They have in the past….why stop now.

By: Cody Quirk

Cody Quirk — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:37:01 +0000

Oddly, some conservatives even CPers may align with some tenents of Sharia.

= No we don’t- sounds like you’re speaking from a lower part of your body.

By: mdh

mdh — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:07:45 +0000

Now.

By: mdh

mdh — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:59:07 +0000

Dude… fuck this whole government business. What we need is anarchy. Bow.

By: Melty

Melty — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:47:38 +0000

Duffy even caws the “support our troops” warhawk cry . . . if he gets the nod it’s worse than I thought

Citizen, as Appropriation Committee Chairman, Obey’s got some pull as to what $figures get written on spending bills. Spending on Iraq Occupation went up a lot when he got that spot back.

By: Peter Orvetti

Peter Orvetti — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:14:06 +0000

Mielke is not assured of the GOP nomination. He faces Sean Duffy (http://duffyforcongress.com/), described at Politics1 as “Ashland County District Attorney & Ex-MTV Real World Cast Member”!

By: Donald R. Lake

Donald R. Lake — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:45:03 +0000

I am not a GOP fan. I have fed an unenthusiastic FBI damning information on current federal felon and former corrupt insular Congress Member Puke Cunningham since the mid 1990s! Since Dick [less] Nixon’s fake ‘to end the conflict in Viet Nam’ secret [non existent] I have literally hated most GOP.

How ever ……….

“Tedward [Wayward ?????] was also a full blown U. S. Senator when ‘Norma Jean Baker’ expired of a ‘Drug Over Dose’ in 1963. I’m not saying that Teddy was in on it, and I will not say that he killed Mary Jo [pregnant with his seed ????] but it was beyond doubt that his actions, and at least in actions lead to Mary Jo’s untimely demise and he was a powerful figure when noisy, loud, pushy First Lady wanna be super star Monroe died unexpectantly!

I will not say that the KKK brothers directly murdered Marlyn Monroe [wasn't she married to President James .......] but then again ……….

Like Michael Jackson, weird stuff just keeps happening with the Kennedys [and the Rockefellers] ………

Citizens For A Better Veterans Home, struggling to warn the public about the ongoing failure of veterans programs, not just more lethal, politicized, uncaring programs that create hack patronage jobs, spend taxes in constituent communities, while doing little or nothing for real veterans, their real families, with their real problems ……”

By: citizen1

citizen1 — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:00:50 +0000

Cutting supplies to the troops is just a treat. It would be up to the president to decide whether to cut supplies or bring them home.

By: George Phillies

George Phillies — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 18:42:06 +0000

Eric, you are again confusing the Libertarian Party with the Party of Paranoia and Bigotry, the party whose mascot is soon to be identified as the Woolly Mammoth, when it is not Gopy the Gopasaurus.

Ill-tempered. Stupid. Extinct.

By: Eric Dondero

Eric Dondero — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:10:38 +0000

Melty, sounds like this Melke guy is more of a Libertarian than a CP-er. If he’s not a cut-and-runner War wimp, Saddam Hussein boot-licker, than he is by definition A LIBERTARIAN.

Libertarians believe in protecting America from Radical Islamists who want to impose Sharia Law: outlawing booze and gambling, jailing marijuana smokers for life, forcing our wives and girlfriends to wear ugly black burqas from head to toe, and cutting off the genitals of our gay friends.

Oddly, some conservatives even CPers may align with some tenents of Sharia. We Libertarians strongly and fiercely oppose these Radical Islamist bastards!

Gooooooo Muelke!

By: Melty

Melty — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:30:46 +0000

I once met Mielke at a Ron Paul campaign meetup, but didn’t know he was fittin to run for Congress. Had I known, I’d've told m “Run on the liquidate-empire message Ron Paul-style to expose Obey’s hypocritical war spending increases.” That could work this time around too if he’d pipe up soon enough, like now. He’d probably loose more Republican votes than gain Democrat votes, but the gain in the swing vote could boost him. It’d draw ovations from the Constitution Party. Anything to draw attention would help. Obey’s been holding that office so long (bout forty years) it’s like it’s a given that he’s the man.

By: NewFederalist

NewFederalist — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:02:26 +0000

Since last time out the result was 61% for Obey and 39% for Mielke I doubt the CP endorsement will be enough to reverse the result. If it is closer, however, the CP will be able to point to any improvement as an example of their clout. Not necessarily a bad strategy unless the result is the same or worse.

By: Melty

Melty — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:02:07 +0000

Dan Mielke is well-aligned with the Constitution Party all round, with one conspicuous exception – that of noninterventionism. On his website, all he says is cut-no-supplies-to-troops, which to me just means remain entrenched.

Like last year, Mielke will run against sitting Democrat David Obey. Obey was vocally opposed to the Iraq Occupation. Then, when he returned to his seat as Appropriations Committee Chairman in January 2007, his tune of withdrawal timetable changed into cut-no-supplies-to-troops, and Mielke’s talk is identical.

But, to Mielke’s credit, there is a difference between the two on foreign policy. Mielke wants to cut off all foreign aid.

The Constitution Party is comprimising its noninterventionist stance with this endorsement.