<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three alternative candidates on ballot in California U.S. House primary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/08/three-alternative-candidates-on-ballot-in-california-us-house-primary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/08/three-alternative-candidates-on-ballot-in-california-us-house-primary/</link>
	<description>Covering America's third parties and independent candidates since May 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:57:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Third Party Revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/08/three-alternative-candidates-on-ballot-in-california-us-house-primary/comment-page-1/#comment-91542</link>
		<dc:creator>Third Party Revolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=9449#comment-91542</guid>
		<description>I know that Mr. Agrella ran with the LP and was on the ballot. I also remembered that the SWP also had a candidate running in that election as a write-in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that Mr. Agrella ran with the LP and was on the ballot. I also remembered that the SWP also had a candidate running in that election as a write-in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Orvetti</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/08/three-alternative-candidates-on-ballot-in-california-us-house-primary/comment-page-1/#comment-90463</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Orvetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=9449#comment-90463</guid>
		<description>According to the SurveyUSA poll, &quot;The top finishing Democrat, the top finishing Republican, and one third-party candidate will appear on the November general election ballot.&quot;  This was not my understanding of the California system, but I deferred to the source material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the SurveyUSA poll, &#8220;The top finishing Democrat, the top finishing Republican, and one third-party candidate will appear on the November general election ballot.&#8221;  This was not my understanding of the California system, but I deferred to the source material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Seebeck</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/08/three-alternative-candidates-on-ballot-in-california-us-house-primary/comment-page-1/#comment-90460</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Seebeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=9449#comment-90460</guid>
		<description>The post above is also incorrect.

If no candidate gets 50%+1 in the special Sep. 1 primary, the top vote-getters from each party advance to the run-off (not the top D, R, and third party candidate as the post states).

So for the run-off, if there is one, there will be winner of the 4 Democrats, the winner of the 6 Republicans, and the unopposed Green, P&amp;F, and AIP candidates--5 in all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post above is also incorrect.</p>
<p>If no candidate gets 50%+1 in the special Sep. 1 primary, the top vote-getters from each party advance to the run-off (not the top D, R, and third party candidate as the post states).</p>
<p>So for the run-off, if there is one, there will be winner of the 4 Democrats, the winner of the 6 Republicans, and the unopposed Green, P&amp;F, and AIP candidates&#8211;5 in all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Seebeck</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/08/three-alternative-candidates-on-ballot-in-california-us-house-primary/comment-page-1/#comment-90459</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Seebeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 06:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=9449#comment-90459</guid>
		<description>TPR, you remember badly.

Chris was the Libertarian candidate, and he branded himself as both independent (in reference to party directives) and Libertarian.

He advanced to the run-off because he had no party opponent in the primary and because no candidate got 50%+1.  There were no independent write-ins in that race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TPR, you remember badly.</p>
<p>Chris was the Libertarian candidate, and he branded himself as both independent (in reference to party directives) and Libertarian.</p>
<p>He advanced to the run-off because he had no party opponent in the primary and because no candidate got 50%+1.  There were no independent write-ins in that race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Third Party Revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/08/three-alternative-candidates-on-ballot-in-california-us-house-primary/comment-page-1/#comment-90424</link>
		<dc:creator>Third Party Revolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 03:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=9449#comment-90424</guid>
		<description>I remembered in the special election in which Christopher Agrella ran that if an independent write-in candidate managed to get 500 votes and still there wasn&#039;t a winner, then he or she would advance to the runoffs and appear on the ballot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remembered in the special election in which Christopher Agrella ran that if an independent write-in candidate managed to get 500 votes and still there wasn&#8217;t a winner, then he or she would advance to the runoffs and appear on the ballot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Orvetti</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/08/three-alternative-candidates-on-ballot-in-california-us-house-primary/comment-page-1/#comment-90412</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Orvetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=9449#comment-90412</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good question.  I believe the top finisher from neither major party will advance to the general election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good question.  I believe the top finisher from neither major party will advance to the general election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Third Party Revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/08/three-alternative-candidates-on-ballot-in-california-us-house-primary/comment-page-1/#comment-90267</link>
		<dc:creator>Third Party Revolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=9449#comment-90267</guid>
		<description>Is it possible for Tiffany Attwood to get on the ballot in the runoff is she manages to get a lot of votes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible for Tiffany Attwood to get on the ballot in the runoff is she manages to get a lot of votes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

