Comments on: George Phillies reviews recent Libertarian National Committee meeting in St. Louis

By: paulie

paulie — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:21:15 +0000

Who is “Jessica Irons”?

“Jessica Irons” = “Eric Dondero” = “Eric Rittberg” = “A raving lunatic who is paid peanuts by the Republican Party to divert quasi-libertarians (of the pro-war variety) away from the growing herd of actual libertarians (of the anti-war variety), who has fantasies of being a female, and is a fan of actor Jeremy Irons.”

…I hope everything makes sense now.

Er, well, as much as it can make sense.

——————-
Paulie, is that a Russian CTANKEP?

I don’t think it’s Eric.

For one thing, he would have to be a computer hacker. One or more of the Irons posts originated from an IP where “Irons” could not possibly have been at the time.

By: Dear .......... Thinkers

Dear .......... Thinkers — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:17:01 +0000

Stewart Flood // Aug 2, 2009:

“ “[George] Phillies’ [Mass] report of what transpired is inaccurate and incomplete ……….” ”

——– With Doctor Phillies’ gentle, ‘clear headed’ guidance, at least the Libs were the one and only group to spread the anti war message during the 21st Century! Oops this dysinformation is also ‘inaccurate and incomplete’ ……….. Lake

By: Eric "Jessica Irons" Dondero

Eric "Jessica Irons" Dondero — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 05:50:56 +0000

Who is “Jessica Irons”?

“Jessica Irons” = “Eric Dondero” = “Eric Rittberg” = “A raving lunatic who is paid peanuts by the Republican Party to divert quasi-libertarians (of the pro-war variety) away from the growing herd of actual libertarians (of the anti-war variety), who has fantasies of being a female, and is a fan of actor Jeremy Irons.”

…I hope everything makes sense now.

Er, well, as much as it can make sense.

——————-
Paulie, is that a Russian CTANKEP?

By: libertariangirl

libertariangirl — Mon, 03 Aug 2009 23:16:26 +0000

LOL

By: paulie

paulie — Mon, 03 Aug 2009 23:03:38 +0000

Jessica’s

By: Jim

Jim — Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:46:21 +0000

Is that Andy’s car?

By: paulie

paulie — Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:35:00 +0000

Different Jefferson Davis, I think.

By: paulie

paulie — Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:33:01 +0000

@irons

By: Steven R Linnabary

Steven R Linnabary — Mon, 03 Aug 2009 03:19:25 +0000

I’m not sure how far the LP would get running on the abolition of slavery.

And it might be sending mixed signals with Jefferson Davis being one of our featured speakers!

PEACE

By: Leymann Feldenstein

Leymann Feldenstein — Mon, 03 Aug 2009 02:58:48 +0000

“Davis claims to be a relative by descent of Jefferson Davis. He appears to be the same Jefferson Davis who writes for the far right “Southern Party”.”

Seems appropriate for the LP since it has become nothing more than a platform for Dixiecrats and other George Wallace/Strom Thurmond wannabees.

By: Leymann Feldenstein

Leymann Feldenstein — Mon, 03 Aug 2009 02:55:34 +0000

“I was enthusiastic for Barr/Root. But I fear the LP will nominate a loser in 2012. ”

So when did the LP ever nominate a winner?

Robert Milnes would have done just as well as Bob Barr.

Maybe Borat has a better chance in 2012.

By: John Famularo

John Famularo — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 20:11:31 +0000

Stewart Flood wrote,
“the LNC dealt with it by eliminating them.[21 strategies]”

Having no strategic plan is not insane, just inane

By: libertariangirl

libertariangirl — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 19:26:09 +0000

Andy , any guesses as to who it really is?

By: Stewart Flood

Stewart Flood — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 19:01:15 +0000

“Considering 20 or 21 concomitant strategies is insane.”

That is exactly why the issue was brought up and why the LNC dealt with it by eliminating them.

Mr Phillies’ report of what transpired is inaccurate and incomplete.

By: Andy

Andy — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 12:24:09 +0000

“Jessica Irons // Aug 1, 2009 at 7:11 am

I see the loser crew is back.”

I see that the chickenshit liar “Jessica Irons” is back posting the same false information under the same fake name.

By: John Famularo

John Famularo — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 11:20:21 +0000

George Phillies reported,

“There was no actual discussion of any strategy. … general question as to whether there were 20 or 21 strategies. …The motion leaves the 2001 Strategic Plan in place.”

No one on the LNC has any idea of what constitutes strategic planning. Considering 20 or 21 concomitant strategies is insane.

By: Catholic Trotskyist

Catholic Trotskyist — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 09:49:15 +0000

George Phillies does not suck. Although I disagree with his attitudes on many social and economic issues.

By: Mik Robertson

Mik Robertson — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 04:41:53 +0000

@12 Perhaps it could apply to George, too.

By: A Girl Who Knows

A Girl Who Knows — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 04:36:15 +0000

George Phillies sucks.

By: Catholic Trotskyist

Catholic Trotskyist — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 04:14:49 +0000

Mik, who are you directing this poem at? I guess it could apply to me, Gary, Jessica or Eric, and that’s only on this thread. Don is here but he hasn’t compalined so much today, and Milnes is missing.