Not a good showing of a response, IMO.

http://marijuananews.com/blog/general-news/someone-is-lying-kubby-fired-by-cannabis-science-accuses-melamede-and-cowan-of-theft-etc-are-you-a-thief-if-you-don%E2%80%99t-agree-with-me/

Since neither of them is my friend any longer, apparently they felt justified in making some deal that kept my past writing in Michelle’s property (my name no longer appears, but the articles were still there last time I checked), whatever money that may have changed hands with ENM (assuming any did), and my self banned from LFV.

As I said – more their loss than mine.

Not that I’m happy with it, but it’s a dead horse. I’ve moved on. Why do you want to dig it up?

With any luck, I hope her health gets better and she runs on your ticket in 2012. You deserve each other.

Can you spell l-a-p-t-o-p?

Can you spell I–d-o-n-’-t–w-a-n-t–o-n-e?

There’s that word TIME in there. It’s a key factor.

IIRC, Miche stated in so many words she thinks I am cute.

Maybe she will leave her husband for you and be your VP candidate.

So if Trent goes to sell IPR will you feel you have a similar claim to it?

No. I was never an admin at IPR. I did not invite Trent to blog here, he was here before me. I did not promote him to admin.

Not analogous.

However, last time IPR was sold, I sold my share on the condition/understanding that whoever bought it would not substantially alter what I have written here in the past. I certainly hope that if Trent’s boss sells it that this condition would attach to any subsequent sale.

Info flow specialist pc/pc, at least point to a few threads that state YOUR grievances against ENM.

Why should I do your homework? If you are so interested, dig them up yourself. I am fairly sure some of them are still on the front page of Next Free Voice. Do a search.

Did you communicate this to her?

I’m not sure what “this” is, but I communicated with her until she stopped replying. Incidentally, I found HER to be quite abusive right before that happened. I asked her when and where she thought I had been abusive to her, and told her that it had never been my intention to so be and that, if I had inadvertantly come off that way, I apologized. She blustered that I was intentionally and repeatedly abusive and pointed to an email exchange. I reviewed it, and in no way was I abusive to her.

She also claimed I was “disparaging her and LFV” and that she received some email I allegedly sent out. The only email I sent out during the time in question was sent to several writers who she either kicked off LFV right before or after me or left on their own as she went on a power trip right around that time. It was a very short note that invited them to blog on my blog, since then renamed Next Free Voice. It did not disparage anyone. In her last reply to me she claimed I had also sent (this?) note to various “groups,” which I did not do; however, one of the people I sent it to, Brian Miller, copied his reply to the Outright Caucus leadership list and George Phillies. Finally, she claimed I lied about why she demoted me at LFV, yet my note did not say anything about why.

Miche bought it? Why didn’t she negotiate/arbitrate this transaction better?

I have no idea what you mean by “better” here.

& where did she(ENM) get the authority to demote, remove & ban you?

In my opinion, she had no such authority. As a practical matter any admin can demote any other admin. I either did not realize that she could, or never thought she would, do that to me when I (A) invited her to write at LFV and (b) promoted her to admin alongside me and then let her have the chief title because I was on the road with little internet time/access.

She did, nevertheless, without discussion, first demote me and then very quickly removed and banned me from commenting. Morally,e I think if she had a problem with me she could not resolve, she should have removed herself instead, but what’s done is done and no use crying over spilt milk.

It sounds like you have a claim based on contribution of time & labor to part of the sale price.

Morally speaking yes, but as a practical matter it’s not worth the aggravation of pressing such a claim, nor is the case ironclad.

In any case, the bulk of the conversation and conversationists apparently followed me over here, and LFV appears rather dormant, so what did Michelle really acquire and …what would I be pressing to gain? Nothing much it appears.

Thus, I no longer care very much, except to dispute any assertion that ENM is a good person of any sort. And really why should I have to do all this elaboration? It’s all been said before.