Comments on: Neimackle to blame for Franken win?

By: paulie cannoli

paulie cannoli — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:21:47 +0000

No.

By: Libertarian Joseph

Libertarian Joseph — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:20:30 +0000

Want to talk on the phone, Paulie?

By: paulie cannoli

paulie cannoli — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:15:24 +0000

Those are the only ones I am deleting.

By: Trent Hill

Trent Hill — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:14:17 +0000

No deleting comments unless he pretends to be someone else.

By: paulie cannoli

paulie cannoli — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:08:31 +0000

You know damn well what’s going on. You are posting comments under the names of other people who post comments here. Using an IP anonymizer does not hide the fact.

By: Libertarian Joseph

Libertarian Joseph — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:08:02 +0000

Tom, you have to do in the sunset of the eve of a new moon. You fail.

By: Libertarian Joseph

Libertarian Joseph — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:06:35 +0000

hmm. What’s going on here?

By: paulie cannoli

paulie cannoli — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:41:37 +0000

LOL.

Marzullo, please stop posting comments as other commenters here. I am starting to delete such comments by you unless Trent tells me otherwise.

By: Trent Hill

Trent Hill — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:26:06 +0000

“Dick // Jan 9, 2009 at 9:29 am

and he sucked dick…”

Is that an admittance?

By: Dick

Dick — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:29:01 +0000

and he sucked dick…

By: Dick

Dick — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:28:41 +0000

Only Barkley was invited to the debates out of all third parties.

By: NewFederalist

NewFederalist — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:06:27 +0000

Why would any self respecting Constitutionalist ever vote for Coleman? Ugh!

By: Gene Berkman

Gene Berkman — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:01:21 +0000

Charles Aldrich was the Libertarian Party candidate, and he received around 14,000 votes compared to around 9,000 votes for the Constitution Party candidate.

Barkley received 2000 times the difference in votes between Franken & Coleman; Aldrich received 60 times the difference, and Niemackl received 40 times the difference.

By: paulie cannoli

paulie cannoli — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:17:39 +0000

I thought there was an L P candidate?

Regardless, the idea that votes “came out of someone” is silly.

If that candidate was serving those voters better than Niemackl, they would have voted for him.

A free country does not survive by keeping competing views off the ballot. I don’t know whether elections can allow us to resolve our differences peacefully, but we should try while we can, and it’s not a free or fair election if some people are kept from participating or have their choices artificially limited to pro-NWO pepsi and coke.

Hopefully, we can avoid mass violence, or at least buy enough time to help even the odds on behalf of the people.

By: Thane Eichenauer

Thane Eichenauer — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:09:32 +0000

I think that while various people will blame some candidates for their temerity to petition themselves onto any given ballot these same people have yet to take up the call for IRV or any other system of non-first past the post system that would eliminate their claim of spoiler candidates.
I encourage anybody who is unhappy with the results in the MN US Senate race to search for “instant runoff voting” or “Fair Vote”. We had a city initiative in Glendale, Arizona last November and it came close to winning at 45% in favor.