Comments on: Libertarian Gail Lightfoot’s lawsuit against Obama eligibility granted conference by US Supreme Court

By: Dear .......... Thinkers

Dear .......... Thinkers — Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:19:30 +0000

think that the original USA Pledge of Allegence (written by a Baptist socialist labor organizer) has no religious intrusions on our secular public administration!

As a GP [General Protestant] long term believer I also am against religious invocations and military chaplains ……. Lake

Obama, my Yokohoma Momma …………..

aulie cannoli // Jan 17, 2009 at 9:39 pm
” I would have a lot more respect for him if he really did refuse to pledge allegiance to the flag” ……… and he folded on the flag lapel pin in a heart beat!

By: mary holand

mary holand — Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:45:52 +0000

hell who knows we may get lucky and get a judge that up holds the constitution instead of up holding this lying Kenyan. So far they have been well paid to drop the cases. More tham half of them are democrats and the others are greedy .
Just keep suing , like I said we may get an honest judge.

By: Peter Orvetti

Peter Orvetti — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:23:34 +0000

This is a pretty good “Ok, what if it were true?” piece.

http://www.slate.com/id/2224167/

By: paulie

paulie — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:17:48 +0000

Yep

By: libertariangirl

libertariangirl — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:01:07 +0000

can anyone say NEVER GONNA HAPPEN.

By: gaetano

gaetano — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:48:40 +0000

For one,Obama nor anyone has given the answer as to why so much money was spent to fight aginst showing his birth certificate.And also ,If he is found to be a userper,he would be dismissed and so would Joe biden because any thing obama does as a userper is dismissed,including choosing biden,as running mate.Nancy oelosy would take temporary charge and a new election would tak place.

By: Paul

Paul — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:52:45 +0000

Orly Taitz, from Orange, CA, sounds like Arnold Schwarzenegger and acts like Sarah Palin. Now I know what the mean when they say “behind the Orange Curtain”, when they talk about Orange County, the captial of Conspiracy Theories. Oh well…

By: paulie

paulie — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:04:20 +0000

TJ, why the euphemisms (“conservative,” “western”)? Say what you really mean. You’re obviously a racist (“racialist” if you prefer, a distinction without a difference). I’m sure you know Lane’s “14 words” by heart and there is a pretty good chance that there are pictures of you with a swastika and/or burning cross floating around somewhere.

As for Richard Winger or myself, we are not liberals, at least in any modern use of the term.

By: TJ

TJ — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:57:39 +0000

The big difference between conservatives (not neocons and not republicans) and liberals is that liberals always have an excuse for their own while blowing up anything the other side does into a monstronsity. I don’t need to defend this, the differences in the coverage of current stories about 50 blacks attacking one white family and a country club refunding the money to a group of blacks is proof enough. No matter what a liberal does, no matter how scummy and immoral there is a reasonable explanation, because as long as they are behind pushing an anti western agenda they are good liberals. BUT when the shoe is on the other foot, and a conservative speaks his mind we have a crime against humanity itself.

We have a person acting as Commander in Chief whose citizenship has not been proven. It is things like this which have brought down whole nations historically, and this ass ‘Richard Winger’ spouts the same liberal ideology; don’t obey the law, if it doesn’t suit our needs we will just change it while we are breaking it.

One day I will be in power and I will just change the law to make it alright for me to kill anyone who disagrees with me, after I have killed a few hundred people. How would that sound, Richard?

By: Jim Davidson

Jim Davidson — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:40:08 +0000

Greg, the point of this particular lawsuit is to enforce the limits of governmental power. I don’t particularly object to the birth certificate from Hawai’i that has been shown on various web pages. But I do agree with holding the government and its officers to all of the limitations of the constitution.

It is a daunting task. I think it is unlikely to ever happen in a complete and thorough way. And even if the government were held to all the limits in the constitution, there would still be far too much government crap in far too many areas of life.

But, as long as we are here, in the midst of tyranny, and we seek to go there, toward more freedom, reducing the size and scope of government to only those things explicitly permitted in the constitution is a good place to start.

If there were a contract between you and another party, and they tried to abuse your rights and privileges under the contract, you would object, right? And if taking them to court were the only way to get any relief, you’d at least think about doing so, right?

By: Marianne

Marianne — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:06:23 +0000

When we get judges that uphold the WE THE PEOPLE and make Obama show he quailfies then the lawsuits will stop.
I saw on the internet that Obama has a press in canada and an old typewriter that is going to give him a long copy BC. Hopesomeone checks the ink. I want to see his documents also.

By: Greg

Greg — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:52:21 +0000

Filing law suits seems to me what the extreme version of Libertarian thought would leave people with. I have argued this point with some old libertarians who wanted alot less laws being passed. Back then the argument was about an explosion in government planing in the form of zoning. The argument they had was that common law has a remedy through the court as nuisance litigation. They were right it does.

So I see these libertarians using the court to redress harms they see through the courts as simply consistent with the ends of libertarian thought.

I also see nothing wrong with it. But I also, as a conservative, see nothing wrong with protecting grandma, who cant afford a lawyer from that 10,000 hog confined feeding operation being 200 feet from her front door.

Soooo…. we have the constitution (zoning), we have grandma (me), so who is going to litigate this question, because the government (zoning board) didnt do it! I am more than happy that there is someone out there with a few buck to ask the question and help grandma and sue the 10,000 hog confined feeding operation (Obama)!!!

By: Jill

Jill — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:56:17 +0000

Orly Taitz is an AIPAC delegate. Now what would the big picture be?http://www.washingtonjewishweek.com/main.asp?SectionID=4&SubSectionID=4&ArticleID=4952&TM=86380.5

By: WILLB

WILLB — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:40:26 +0000

By the mere fact that Obama’s unwillingness to supply a certified copy of his birth certificate to become the most powerful person in the world, it is a fallacy of justice. We provide more information to sign our kids up to little league soccer. THINK PEOPLE! The law is the law. The current constitution is in effect as it is and the one most important person that is sworn to uphold the constitution is breaking the constitution. THINK PEOPLE. What content of character is this and what else will he do. No one is above the law and this 1 of many corrupt acts that he and the demorat party has done. Where is the guts of the conservatives & republican pansies? No one is serving the people. The politicians serve themselves & the media & celebrities glorify them.

By: Robert Capozzi

Robert Capozzi — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:11:21 +0000

RW: If Obama were proved to be ineligible, there is nothing to stop the USA from repealing that part of Article II about “natural-born”.

Me: I’m no lawyer, but wouldn’t that be an ex post facto law? At the moment, I’d prefer Obama to Biden.

By: stepfanie

stepfanie — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:01:58 +0000

Who really cares who the president is anyway? He is more like a figure head. And besides, when was the last time that our government was able to put it’s differences aside and actually did anything that improved american lives? I can’t think of any can you? Seems to me the only thing they have been bi-partisan about was stealing all our tax dollars out from under us and giving it to the elite. Oh, and scaring the hell out of everyone of course! Should the constitution be upheld, definately, does any of this really help the country, not really, it has the potential to turn it into a third world country!

By: paulie cannoli

paulie cannoli — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 01:44:19 +0000

Everyone KNOWS that CAPITAL LETTERS are CRUISE CONTROL for AWESOME and a more TRUE AND CORRECT argument.

ONLY MORE SO if FOLLOWED by LOT’S and LOT’S of GRaMMARATiCAL and SPELLING EROS, TYPE O’s and EXCLAMATION POINT’s !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

For Bonus points you must include MUSLIMS and JOOOOZZZZZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By: paulie cannoli

paulie cannoli — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 01:39:22 +0000

Also, Have you NOTED the picture where Obama WILL NOT Pledge to the USA Flag….

If only we were so lucky.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslim.asp

Scroll down. This claim, like much else of the trash that floats around, is completely false, and idiotic.

However, I would have a lot more respect for him if he really did refuse to pledge allegiance to the flag:

http://rexcurry.net/

By: Kerry Wilson

Kerry Wilson — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:45:19 +0000

So the BIG Answer from ALL Supreme Court members are…. THE VOTERS HAVE SPOKEN… now SHUT UP.

Sad……….

By: Steven Druckenmiller

Steven Druckenmiller — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:42:36 +0000

Everyone KNOWS that CAPITAL LETTERS are CRUISE CONTROL for AWESOME and a more TRUE AND CORRECT argument.