Press "Enter" to skip to content

Libertarian Party poll of the day: Are Democrats less ‘hawkish’ than Republicans?

http://www.lp.org/poll/are-democrats-less-hawkish-than-republicans

9 Comments

  1. paulie cannoli Post author | December 23, 2008

    I agree – although this approach is brand new, and the only other time it has been tried yet that I know of, the results were markedly worse.

    And, whatever you said in that last line to you and yours as well đŸ™‚

  2. libertyuk2000 December 23, 2008

    I do like how the polls are related to either a press release or a blog entry of late.

    I find this helpful in understanding the Libertarian view point as well as proving insight as to why a particular poll was published.

    I do look forward to more of the same in the future. Bravo to your USLP Staff for making this extra effort. I shall encourage the UKLP to follow suit with the excellent approach.

    May you all have a Blythe Yule an a Guid Hogmanay

  3. paulie cannoli Post author | December 22, 2008

    In light of the press release, I submit this one isn’t so bad, and a definite improvement over several other recent ones.

    Current results:

    Yes
    28% (36 votes)

    Maybe
    14% (18 votes)

    No
    58% (76 votes)

    Total votes: 130

  4. Michael Seebeck December 22, 2008

    True, Jim, true. But yours and mine aren’t mutually exclusive, either. đŸ˜€

  5. JimDavidson December 22, 2008

    Michael, I suggest the following counter poll:

    Are Andrew Davis polls

    A. Idiotic
    B. Neo-conservative
    C. Blindingly Obvious
    D. Bad for the LP
    E. All of the above

  6. Michael Seebeck December 22, 2008

    Counter-poll of the day: Are LP.org’s daily polls become more stupid with each passing day?

    A. Yes
    B. Definitely Yes
    C. Hell, Yes!

  7. paulie cannoli Post author | December 22, 2008

    Current results:

    Yes
    28% (16 votes)

    Maybe
    9% (5 votes)

    No
    64% (37 votes)

  8. Libertarian Joseph December 22, 2008

    Yeah, to an extent. The Democratic Party sheep are very anti-war, but their leaders are not so anti-war, they’re just playing to their base. Why would dems pass that up? Now you see Obama wanting to increase troop levels in Afghanistan. Odd how some GOP are now saying “mission accoplished” in Iraq, an attempt on saving face or a move to justify Obama possibly “leaving” Iraq. Naturally, we’ll still have bases in Iraq. Nothing wrong with bases, but why? Waste of money IMO.

Comments are closed.