<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: British Reformed Sectarian Party polls 33% in two-way Florida Legislative race</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/11/british-reformed-sectarian-party-polls-33-in-two-way-florida-legislative-race/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/11/british-reformed-sectarian-party-polls-33-in-two-way-florida-legislative-race/</link>
	<description>Covering America's third parties and independent candidates since May 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:58:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimDavidson</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/11/british-reformed-sectarian-party-polls-33-in-two-way-florida-legislative-race/comment-page-1/#comment-26184</link>
		<dc:creator>JimDavidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=4742#comment-26184</guid>
		<description>I know exactly what these high vote totals represent.

In Kelly&#039;s race against Cannon, he found 33% of the vote because those were &quot;yellow dog Democrats.&quot;  They would vote for a yellow dog if it were running as a Democrat.  Indeed, they were so determined not to vote for a Republican, that they found, to their surprise, that they were willing to push for the &quot;British Reformed Sectarian&quot; candidate, without the least clue what that meant, nor who he was.  You can perform extensive exit polling if you like, but that&#039;s what happened.

In the race of Tart against unknown Democrat, Tart found 18.8% of the vote.  These were yellow dog Republicans.  They were surprised to find that they could bring themselves to vote for a Constitution Party candidate, even one they&#039;d never heard of, rather than vote for a Democrat.

Given that it was Florida, my guess would be that these are fairly typical results, with one or two counties more extreme or possibly trending the other way.  There are about a third of voters who cannot bring themselves to vote Republican and a bit less than a fifth who can&#039;t bring themselves to vote Democrat.  

You know what they say about Florida voters...if you have four Florida voters, there&#039;s a fifth around somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know exactly what these high vote totals represent.</p>
<p>In Kelly&#8217;s race against Cannon, he found 33% of the vote because those were &#8220;yellow dog Democrats.&#8221;  They would vote for a yellow dog if it were running as a Democrat.  Indeed, they were so determined not to vote for a Republican, that they found, to their surprise, that they were willing to push for the &#8220;British Reformed Sectarian&#8221; candidate, without the least clue what that meant, nor who he was.  You can perform extensive exit polling if you like, but that&#8217;s what happened.</p>
<p>In the race of Tart against unknown Democrat, Tart found 18.8% of the vote.  These were yellow dog Republicans.  They were surprised to find that they could bring themselves to vote for a Constitution Party candidate, even one they&#8217;d never heard of, rather than vote for a Democrat.</p>
<p>Given that it was Florida, my guess would be that these are fairly typical results, with one or two counties more extreme or possibly trending the other way.  There are about a third of voters who cannot bring themselves to vote Republican and a bit less than a fifth who can&#8217;t bring themselves to vote Democrat.  </p>
<p>You know what they say about Florida voters&#8230;if you have four Florida voters, there&#8217;s a fifth around somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catholic Trotskyist</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/11/british-reformed-sectarian-party-polls-33-in-two-way-florida-legislative-race/comment-page-1/#comment-26149</link>
		<dc:creator>Catholic Trotskyist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=4742#comment-26149</guid>
		<description>The Catholic Trotskyist Party is also a reform sectarian party, but it is anti-British.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Catholic Trotskyist Party is also a reform sectarian party, but it is anti-British.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catholic Trotskyist</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/11/british-reformed-sectarian-party-polls-33-in-two-way-florida-legislative-race/comment-page-1/#comment-26148</link>
		<dc:creator>Catholic Trotskyist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=4742#comment-26148</guid>
		<description>Great party name. They should keep going, and actually develop a real platform. On the other hand, maybe they are better off the way they are now, since they can attract any protest votes, no matter what their issues are. I wonder if he ran an active campaign?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great party name. They should keep going, and actually develop a real platform. On the other hand, maybe they are better off the way they are now, since they can attract any protest votes, no matter what their issues are. I wonder if he ran an active campaign?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

