<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3rd through 6th place, Presidential popular vote by percentage, 1992 to present</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/11/2nd-through-6th-place-presidential-popular-vote-by-percentage-1992-to-present/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/11/2nd-through-6th-place-presidential-popular-vote-by-percentage-1992-to-present/</link>
	<description>Covering America's third parties and independent candidates since May 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:58:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan Wick</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/11/2nd-through-6th-place-presidential-popular-vote-by-percentage-1992-to-present/comment-page-1/#comment-22422</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan Wick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=4205#comment-22422</guid>
		<description>Barr only being a slight improvement over Badnarik can be attributed mostly to a badly run campaign, especially the Ron Paul feud. Not a good idea to pick a fight with the man whose voters&#039; energy you&#039;re trying to tap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barr only being a slight improvement over Badnarik can be attributed mostly to a badly run campaign, especially the Ron Paul feud. Not a good idea to pick a fight with the man whose voters&#8217; energy you&#8217;re trying to tap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie cannoli</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/11/2nd-through-6th-place-presidential-popular-vote-by-percentage-1992-to-present/comment-page-1/#comment-22407</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie cannoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=4205#comment-22407</guid>
		<description>Nader did better this time. 0.38% in 2004, 0.52% in 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nader did better this time. 0.38% in 2004, 0.52% in 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catholic Trotskyist</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/11/2nd-through-6th-place-presidential-popular-vote-by-percentage-1992-to-present/comment-page-1/#comment-22406</link>
		<dc:creator>Catholic Trotskyist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=4205#comment-22406</guid>
		<description>So Nader, who ran a batter campaign, did worse this time, while Barr did a little better than Badnarik, though not much thankfully. Baldwin and McKinney also did a little better than the past candidates of their parties in 2004 despite their problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Nader, who ran a batter campaign, did worse this time, while Barr did a little better than Badnarik, though not much thankfully. Baldwin and McKinney also did a little better than the past candidates of their parties in 2004 despite their problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie cannoli</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/11/2nd-through-6th-place-presidential-popular-vote-by-percentage-1992-to-present/comment-page-1/#comment-22377</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie cannoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=4205#comment-22377</guid>
		<description>Morgan 

Oops, you&#039;re right. I&#039;ll go fix it. 

George, 

I&#039;ve got a few counts up in different tabs from AP, NY Times, CNN, AOL and Fox. Not 100% sure which one I used. It was at a point where 96% or 97% of the vote was tallied, so it may change slightly, but not by much. 

The historical data is from wikipedia and politics1.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morgan </p>
<p>Oops, you&#8217;re right. I&#8217;ll go fix it. </p>
<p>George, </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a few counts up in different tabs from AP, NY Times, CNN, AOL and Fox. Not 100% sure which one I used. It was at a point where 96% or 97% of the vote was tallied, so it may change slightly, but not by much. </p>
<p>The historical data is from wikipedia and politics1.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Phillies</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/11/2nd-through-6th-place-presidential-popular-vote-by-percentage-1992-to-present/comment-page-1/#comment-22373</link>
		<dc:creator>George Phillies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=4205#comment-22373</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the hard work in computing this.  What number did you use for the total vote?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the hard work in computing this.  What number did you use for the total vote?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan Wick</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/11/2nd-through-6th-place-presidential-popular-vote-by-percentage-1992-to-present/comment-page-1/#comment-22367</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan Wick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=4205#comment-22367</guid>
		<description>You mean 3rd-6th places, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean 3rd-6th places, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

