<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Socialist Party Candidate Brian Moore reaches 270 Electoral threshold</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/</link>
	<description>Covering America's third parties and independent candidates since May 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:57:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie cannoli</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19596</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie cannoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19596</guid>
		<description>More in the short term, do you support the same prohibition on labor unions, concerned citizens groups, etc.? 

If so, wouldn&#039;t that give incumbents and mass media (which can never be perfectly objective, no matter what anyone says) inordinate power?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More in the short term, do you support the same prohibition on labor unions, concerned citizens groups, etc.? </p>
<p>If so, wouldn&#8217;t that give incumbents and mass media (which can never be perfectly objective, no matter what anyone says) inordinate power?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie cannoli</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19595</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie cannoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19595</guid>
		<description>Ideally, there would be no corporate entities as presently understood, and no politicians for them to buy if they existed, which they wouldn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ideally, there would be no corporate entities as presently understood, and no politicians for them to buy if they existed, which they wouldn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie cannoli</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19593</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie cannoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19593</guid>
		<description>I support taking so much power away from politicians that no one in their right mind would waste money buying one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I support taking so much power away from politicians that no one in their right mind would waste money buying one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VTV</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19589</link>
		<dc:creator>VTV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19589</guid>
		<description>The question I have for you G.E. is do you support making it illegal for corporate entities to buy politicians? Right now the capitalist situation is empowering free enterprises with enough money to essentially govern our country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question I have for you G.E. is do you support making it illegal for corporate entities to buy politicians? Right now the capitalist situation is empowering free enterprises with enough money to essentially govern our country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.E.</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19460</link>
		<dc:creator>G.E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19460</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;GE, what would you do if I thought being a capitalist was evil?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;d ask you what you meant by capitalism. If you said, &quot;what we have now&quot; or &quot;what Marx described,&quot; I&#039;d say, YOU&#039;RE RIGHT.

If you said, &quot;a system where people mix their labor with the land and engage in peaceful, nonviolent voluntary exchange,&quot; I&#039;d say that you were pure evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>GE, what would you do if I thought being a capitalist was evil?</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d ask you what you meant by capitalism. If you said, &#8220;what we have now&#8221; or &#8220;what Marx described,&#8221; I&#8217;d say, YOU&#8217;RE RIGHT.</p>
<p>If you said, &#8220;a system where people mix their labor with the land and engage in peaceful, nonviolent voluntary exchange,&#8221; I&#8217;d say that you were pure evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie cannoli</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19456</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie cannoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19456</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It depends on what sort of â€œgovernmentâ€ you are talking abt. &lt;/i&gt;

The coercively monopolized state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It depends on what sort of â€œgovernmentâ€ you are talking abt. </i></p>
<p>The coercively monopolized state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darolew</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19449</link>
		<dc:creator>darolew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19449</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;No lobbyists? We donâ€™t have the right to contact and lobby our congressmen to vote correctly?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Apparently not. Also, in socialists&#039; perception of reality, it appears the crisis was caused by disastrous &lt;i&gt;laissez-faire&lt;/i&gt; policies like 1% interest rates by the Federal Reserve, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and  the Community Reinvestment Act. (If that&#039;s what &lt;i&gt;laissez-faire&lt;/i&gt; means, I wonder why socialists seem to dislike it so much.)

Though, such disagreements are increasingly tolerable the more said socialists support &quot;decentraliz[ation]&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;No lobbyists? We donâ€™t have the right to contact and lobby our congressmen to vote correctly?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Apparently not. Also, in socialists&#8217; perception of reality, it appears the crisis was caused by disastrous <i>laissez-faire</i> policies like 1% interest rates by the Federal Reserve, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and  the Community Reinvestment Act. (If that&#8217;s what <i>laissez-faire</i> means, I wonder why socialists seem to dislike it so much.)</p>
<p>Though, such disagreements are increasingly tolerable the more said socialists support &#8220;decentraliz[ation]&#8220;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19444</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19444</guid>
		<description>No lobbyists? We don&#039;t have the right to contact and lobby our congressmen to vote correctly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No lobbyists? We don&#8217;t have the right to contact and lobby our congressmen to vote correctly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deran</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19443</link>
		<dc:creator>Deran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19443</guid>
		<description>It depends on what sort of &quot;government&quot; you are talking abt. If you are talking abt what Nader talks abt; a decentralizing, horizontally democratic, transparent, system with no lobbyists, etc, then that government would be ideal to oversee capitalism. A government like what we have here now in the US; not so much.

Nader talks abt making sure the corporations can not dominate the government. This is the sort of social democratic/democratic socialist government that would be most effective in avoiding the recent laisse faire excesses that lead to chaos and barbarism. 

I think as the economy spirals downward, the Left will lose majopr opportunities for a broader audience if all they propose is old industrial age ideas; for one, industrialism is over, and two the authoritarianism that came with that old school statist socialism is completely discredited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends on what sort of &#8220;government&#8221; you are talking abt. If you are talking abt what Nader talks abt; a decentralizing, horizontally democratic, transparent, system with no lobbyists, etc, then that government would be ideal to oversee capitalism. A government like what we have here now in the US; not so much.</p>
<p>Nader talks abt making sure the corporations can not dominate the government. This is the sort of social democratic/democratic socialist government that would be most effective in avoiding the recent laisse faire excesses that lead to chaos and barbarism. </p>
<p>I think as the economy spirals downward, the Left will lose majopr opportunities for a broader audience if all they propose is old industrial age ideas; for one, industrialism is over, and two the authoritarianism that came with that old school statist socialism is completely discredited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie cannoli</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19394</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie cannoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19394</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And whatâ€™s this true free market? Iâ€™d imagine a society where corporations can be ignored and not turned, essentially, into an elite government?&lt;/i&gt;

I imagine they would not exist, since they get their corporate charter, corporate personhood, and nonconcensual limited liability (not to mention massive direct and indirect corporate welfare) from...yep, government. 

Isn&#039;t the latest trillion dollar corporate bailout by government, or the trillions spent by it on wars on behalf of corporations, not enough for most anti-corporate people to understand - far from being a check on corporations, government is their creator and enabler, destroyer of their small business competition, and guarantor of their profits? 

Putting government in charge of policing corporations is truly putting the fox in charge of the chicken coop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And whatâ€™s this true free market? Iâ€™d imagine a society where corporations can be ignored and not turned, essentially, into an elite government?</i></p>
<p>I imagine they would not exist, since they get their corporate charter, corporate personhood, and nonconcensual limited liability (not to mention massive direct and indirect corporate welfare) from&#8230;yep, government. </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t the latest trillion dollar corporate bailout by government, or the trillions spent by it on wars on behalf of corporations, not enough for most anti-corporate people to understand &#8211; far from being a check on corporations, government is their creator and enabler, destroyer of their small business competition, and guarantor of their profits? </p>
<p>Putting government in charge of policing corporations is truly putting the fox in charge of the chicken coop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gladly Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19390</link>
		<dc:creator>Gladly Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19390</guid>
		<description>And what&#039;s this true free market? I&#039;d imagine a society where corporations can be ignored and not turned, essentially, into an elite government?

Well, it seems difficult to find one site charting write-in status, but it depresses me that candidates seriously running for office didn&#039;t take the opportunity to have the chance to be elected by more people. It&#039;s an impressive feat by Frank Moore, with the quote &quot;Like party and weed? Vote Frank Moore&quot; on his site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what&#8217;s this true free market? I&#8217;d imagine a society where corporations can be ignored and not turned, essentially, into an elite government?</p>
<p>Well, it seems difficult to find one site charting write-in status, but it depresses me that candidates seriously running for office didn&#8217;t take the opportunity to have the chance to be elected by more people. It&#8217;s an impressive feat by Frank Moore, with the quote &#8220;Like party and weed? Vote Frank Moore&#8221; on his site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie cannoli</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19375</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie cannoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19375</guid>
		<description>Both state corporate capitalism and state socialism are evil. 

True free markets and intentional communes are not evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both state corporate capitalism and state socialism are evil. </p>
<p>True free markets and intentional communes are not evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gladly Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19370</link>
		<dc:creator>Gladly Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19370</guid>
		<description>I think it possible to make that argument. You could say Capitalism is just a way to allow your boss to fuck you over, or whatever Marx could think up. Of course, it&#039;s more complicated than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it possible to make that argument. You could say Capitalism is just a way to allow your boss to fuck you over, or whatever Marx could think up. Of course, it&#8217;s more complicated than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ModernWhig</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19352</link>
		<dc:creator>ModernWhig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19352</guid>
		<description>GE, what would you do if I thought being a capitalist was evil?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GE, what would you do if I thought being a capitalist was evil?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19342</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 02:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19342</guid>
		<description>&quot;citizens in need of. . .small business loans&quot;?

Why would any citizen get a loan to start a business if every company is nationalized, and thus owning one&#039;s own business is presumably illegal?  Seems like self-incrimination to me.  Or perhaps since only &quot;for-profit&quot; business is nationalized, the government would allow an entreprenuer to operate only until the venture starts to turn a profit, then they kick down the door take it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;citizens in need of. . .small business loans&#8221;?</p>
<p>Why would any citizen get a loan to start a business if every company is nationalized, and thus owning one&#8217;s own business is presumably illegal?  Seems like self-incrimination to me.  Or perhaps since only &#8220;for-profit&#8221; business is nationalized, the government would allow an entreprenuer to operate only until the venture starts to turn a profit, then they kick down the door take it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.E.</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19329</link>
		<dc:creator>G.E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19329</guid>
		<description>Deran - You think I don&#039;t think the &quot;crooks and scammers in the banking system and Wall Street&quot; are &quot;pure evil&quot;?

I&#039;d go farther than you and say the criminals should be Ceausescu-ed. I&#039;ve said so many times.

The difference between Moore and the Wall Street socialists is that Moore has no power and they do. Moore, to my knowledge, has committed no crimes, since voicing evil opinions is no crime at all. The Wall Street socialists have put their evil opinions into action in the name of mass murder and misery, and they should pay for those crimes with their lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deran &#8211; You think I don&#8217;t think the &#8220;crooks and scammers in the banking system and Wall Street&#8221; are &#8220;pure evil&#8221;?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d go farther than you and say the criminals should be Ceausescu-ed. I&#8217;ve said so many times.</p>
<p>The difference between Moore and the Wall Street socialists is that Moore has no power and they do. Moore, to my knowledge, has committed no crimes, since voicing evil opinions is no crime at all. The Wall Street socialists have put their evil opinions into action in the name of mass murder and misery, and they should pay for those crimes with their lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deran</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19323</link>
		<dc:creator>Deran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 20:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19323</guid>
		<description>&quot;pure evil&quot;

LOL!! You really need to get a gig writing stand up comedy, G.E.

While I think the SPUSA&#039; program is outdated and too industrial age in focus, the sentiment is on the mark.

&quot;Pure evil&quot;, might better describe the crooks and scammers in the banking system and Wall Street, like these:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/oct/17/executivesalaries-banking

Or, the reports that Paulson&#039;s posse initially focused tax payer give aways on political cronies corporations.

That&#039;s evil, not pure evil, like Hitler-evil, but still, very very evil.

Now, I&#039;m not suggesting the crooks that run the economy into this depression should be &quot;Ceausescu-ed&quot; on Christmas morning, but these people should be doing long hard time in Levanworth, not stealing taxpayer money.

I think the SPUSA, and much of the Old Left and 60s-originated-New Left, fail to perceive that a mixed economy, where certain fundamental institutions, like utilities, etc, should be publicly owned, but that capitalism on the small scale, small businesses, it works very efficiently, with socially mandated regulations on workplace safety, and minimum wage etc it is an excellent mechanism for product and service exchange. It&#039;s just once the capitalist enterprises get too big that they turn into corrupt rapacious gangs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;pure evil&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL!! You really need to get a gig writing stand up comedy, G.E.</p>
<p>While I think the SPUSA&#8217; program is outdated and too industrial age in focus, the sentiment is on the mark.</p>
<p>&#8220;Pure evil&#8221;, might better describe the crooks and scammers in the banking system and Wall Street, like these:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/oct/17/executivesalaries-banking" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/oct/17/executivesalaries-banking</a></p>
<p>Or, the reports that Paulson&#8217;s posse initially focused tax payer give aways on political cronies corporations.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s evil, not pure evil, like Hitler-evil, but still, very very evil.</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m not suggesting the crooks that run the economy into this depression should be &#8220;Ceausescu-ed&#8221; on Christmas morning, but these people should be doing long hard time in Levanworth, not stealing taxpayer money.</p>
<p>I think the SPUSA, and much of the Old Left and 60s-originated-New Left, fail to perceive that a mixed economy, where certain fundamental institutions, like utilities, etc, should be publicly owned, but that capitalism on the small scale, small businesses, it works very efficiently, with socially mandated regulations on workplace safety, and minimum wage etc it is an excellent mechanism for product and service exchange. It&#8217;s just once the capitalist enterprises get too big that they turn into corrupt rapacious gangs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie cannoli</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19322</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie cannoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 20:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19322</guid>
		<description>So who are the  candidates who can get 270 votes max., including registered write-in states and open write-in states?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So who are the  candidates who can get 270 votes max., including registered write-in states and open write-in states?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richardwinger</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19317</link>
		<dc:creator>richardwinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19317</guid>
		<description>Frank Moore of Berkeley, California, is a declared write-in presidential candidate in enough states so that he, too, could theoretically be elected.  But he is not on the ballot in any state.  He has done a good job of getting write-in status, in 25 states so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank Moore of Berkeley, California, is a declared write-in presidential candidate in enough states so that he, too, could theoretically be elected.  But he is not on the ballot in any state.  He has done a good job of getting write-in status, in 25 states so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gladly Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/socialist-party-candidate-bryan-moore-reaches-270-electoral-threshold/comment-page-1/#comment-19314</link>
		<dc:creator>Gladly Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3458#comment-19314</guid>
		<description>You can now vote for Brian Moore in 19 states, so, unless you&#039;re too in love with printed ballots, he seems to be among five major minors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can now vote for Brian Moore in 19 states, so, unless you&#8217;re too in love with printed ballots, he seems to be among five major minors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

