Has any candidate gone beyond that?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCun2nzZ17k

I’ve told you the story plenty of times. It’s also in the comments above. He hasn’t called for a new investigation because of his political calculation that it would make him look less ‘respectable.’”

I haven’t heard anything that leads me to believe that Barr questions the official 9/11 story.

All I’ve heard is that when asked, Barr said something like, “Some of my friends believe the official story, and some of my friends think that it was an inside job. I believe my friends.” This is is total cop out and does not indicate that he questions the official story.

What you are suggesting is that Barr suspects an inside job but it too chickenshit to say it or just call for a new investigation. I haven’t seen any evidence of this, especially when one considers that he made the comment that Bush did a good job handling the aftermath of 9/11.

Barr has expressed a certain possible level of skepticism of the official story.”

I haven’t heard him say anything like this. Why hasn’t he called for a new investigation? He’s either corrupt, an idiot, or a coward.

None of the four have endorsed an inside job theory – as far as I know. McKinney probably has given the most indication that she does, but I have not heard anything direct on the issue.

The candidates who do not support a new investigation are John McCain, Barack Obama, and Bob Barr.

We know for a fact that McCain and Obama are a part of the establishment so them supporting the 0fficial government fairy tale about 9/11 should come as no suprise.

Bob Barr is either an establishment lacky, an idiot, or he is simply too chickenshit to call for a new investigation. Whatever the case may be, this is one of the reasons why this 12 year member of the Libertarian Party will not be casting a vote for Bob Barr this November.

Yes, see comments above.

**The JFK assasination is still controversial all these years later. Is Chuck suppose to have an opinion about that too?

**Did Roosevelt know about Pearl Harbor?

**Do UFOs exist? What is area 51 used for?

To attempt to answer any of those questions is a lose/lose and has no bearing on how he would rule as a President, or how dignified his administration would be in dealing justly with government issues. His answer was appropriate IMHO.

Im sure Chuck Baldwin ,if really pressed, would answer that he would fully allow information for such to be made publicly available from the government if he was elected President. In fact in the thread at the Baldwin forum, SteveKC confessed that this indeed was Baldwin said he would do…have an independent investigation.

Any other candidates willing to say that?

I would not expect Baldwin to do any less. None of us can act on hearsay authority. There is much controversy from many angles about 9-11. You cannot expect a President to act based on a “You Tube” or videos produced by people who may have an agenda. All sides must be heard and given platform.

Again, there are conflicting opinions about WT7, and 911 even amongst truthers.

Baldwin’s answer and statement shows wisdom, maturity and patience

Bill Lussenheide