<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cindy Sheehan plans to start a new party to be called The First Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/cindy-sheehan-plans-to-start-a-new-party-to-be-called-the-first-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/cindy-sheehan-plans-to-start-a-new-party-to-be-called-the-first-party/</link>
	<description>Covering America's third parties and independent candidates since May 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:57:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Action94103</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/cindy-sheehan-plans-to-start-a-new-party-to-be-called-the-first-party/comment-page-1/#comment-18726</link>
		<dc:creator>Action94103</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3216#comment-18726</guid>
		<description>Hey, none of the other parties can materialize like the effort of these great leaders putting together the First Party.

March 20th, 2003:  The day after the war in Iraq was launched; thousands and thousands of Nancy Pelosiâ€™s constituents were in San Franciscoâ€™s streets protesting the illegal invasion.  That same day on the floor of Congress, Nancy Pelosi condemned the demonstrators, and voted for a resolution declaring â€œunequivocal support and appreciation of the president â€¦ for his firm leadership and decisive action.â€
Nancy Pelosi:
â€¢	Pushed for the Bail-out of Wall Street!  Voted for the war, and has consistently voted for funding the war with no occupation withdrawal timetable,  Voted for every Bush administration Pentagon budget request since 2001,
â€¢	Refused to deliver and ignored promises made to American Voters in the 2006 mid-term elections to end the war.
â€¢	Pushed the 1999 Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act that repealed Glass-Steagall and allowed commercial and investment banks and insurance companies to combine; it opened the door for the worst financial abuses now apparent.  Pelosi also owns Â½ million dollars in AIG stock, a company she is pushing to be bailed out.
â€¢	Supported the 2001 No Child Left Behind Act with President Bush.
â€¢	Voted for the 2001 USA Patriot Act.
â€¢	Pelosi was briefed by top officials and knew secretly about torture in 2002, and did nothing.
â€¢	Pushed the 2006 Homeland Security Department Authorization Act:  destroying Posse Comitatus, removing constitutionally sacred provisions of preventing the militaryâ€™s direct involvement in domestic law enforcement.
â€¢	Passed the 2008 FISA Amendments Act - to weaken standards of proof and warrants required for surveillance and grant telecom companies retroactive immunity for warrantless spying post-9/11.
â€¢	Pelosi voted against withdrawing from the WTO, and has praised NAFTA.
â€¢	Voted and backed similar &quot;free trade&quot; agreements with Australia, Peru, Chile, and Singapore.   
â€¢	As House Speaker, she declared that efforts to impeach George Bush are &quot;off the table.&quot;
â€¢	Voted for offshore oil drilling, San Franciscans do not support this at all.
Letâ€™s put a real candidate on the ballot who will truly represent San Francisco.
Letâ€™s send Nancy Pelosi home, and put a real representative in the House!
Cindy Sheehan 
for the 8th District U.S. Congress
 (www.cindyforcongress.org)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, none of the other parties can materialize like the effort of these great leaders putting together the First Party.</p>
<p>March 20th, 2003:  The day after the war in Iraq was launched; thousands and thousands of Nancy Pelosiâ€™s constituents were in San Franciscoâ€™s streets protesting the illegal invasion.  That same day on the floor of Congress, Nancy Pelosi condemned the demonstrators, and voted for a resolution declaring â€œunequivocal support and appreciation of the president â€¦ for his firm leadership and decisive action.â€<br />
Nancy Pelosi:<br />
â€¢	Pushed for the Bail-out of Wall Street!  Voted for the war, and has consistently voted for funding the war with no occupation withdrawal timetable,  Voted for every Bush administration Pentagon budget request since 2001,<br />
â€¢	Refused to deliver and ignored promises made to American Voters in the 2006 mid-term elections to end the war.<br />
â€¢	Pushed the 1999 Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act that repealed Glass-Steagall and allowed commercial and investment banks and insurance companies to combine; it opened the door for the worst financial abuses now apparent.  Pelosi also owns Â½ million dollars in AIG stock, a company she is pushing to be bailed out.<br />
â€¢	Supported the 2001 No Child Left Behind Act with President Bush.<br />
â€¢	Voted for the 2001 USA Patriot Act.<br />
â€¢	Pelosi was briefed by top officials and knew secretly about torture in 2002, and did nothing.<br />
â€¢	Pushed the 2006 Homeland Security Department Authorization Act:  destroying Posse Comitatus, removing constitutionally sacred provisions of preventing the militaryâ€™s direct involvement in domestic law enforcement.<br />
â€¢	Passed the 2008 FISA Amendments Act &#8211; to weaken standards of proof and warrants required for surveillance and grant telecom companies retroactive immunity for warrantless spying post-9/11.<br />
â€¢	Pelosi voted against withdrawing from the WTO, and has praised NAFTA.<br />
â€¢	Voted and backed similar &#8220;free trade&#8221; agreements with Australia, Peru, Chile, and Singapore.<br />
â€¢	As House Speaker, she declared that efforts to impeach George Bush are &#8220;off the table.&#8221;<br />
â€¢	Voted for offshore oil drilling, San Franciscans do not support this at all.<br />
Letâ€™s put a real candidate on the ballot who will truly represent San Francisco.<br />
Letâ€™s send Nancy Pelosi home, and put a real representative in the House!<br />
Cindy Sheehan<br />
for the 8th District U.S. Congress<br />
 (www.cindyforcongress.org)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melty Rox</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/cindy-sheehan-plans-to-start-a-new-party-to-be-called-the-first-party/comment-page-1/#comment-18349</link>
		<dc:creator>Melty Rox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3216#comment-18349</guid>
		<description>great party name idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great party name idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Levin</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/cindy-sheehan-plans-to-start-a-new-party-to-be-called-the-first-party/comment-page-1/#comment-18308</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3216#comment-18308</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what I was trying to say, LaineRBT.  Although Nader and Gravel aren&#039;t as socialist as Sheehan (not sure about the others) so it couldn&#039;t be an explicitly socialist party.  I know Nader has thought of starting a party, but I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s related to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what I was trying to say, LaineRBT.  Although Nader and Gravel aren&#8217;t as socialist as Sheehan (not sure about the others) so it couldn&#8217;t be an explicitly socialist party.  I know Nader has thought of starting a party, but I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s related to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaineRBT</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/cindy-sheehan-plans-to-start-a-new-party-to-be-called-the-first-party/comment-page-1/#comment-18307</link>
		<dc:creator>LaineRBT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3216#comment-18307</guid>
		<description>Well, I am interested in what her plans are but I do want a reason why she won&#039;t throw her weight behind the Green Party. I too am afraid that this may just end up being another socialist-left party with no real national organization.

Nader, McKinney, Gonzalez, Sheehan and Gravel would all have to be behind an effort to build another progressive party for it to be worth the effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I am interested in what her plans are but I do want a reason why she won&#8217;t throw her weight behind the Green Party. I too am afraid that this may just end up being another socialist-left party with no real national organization.</p>
<p>Nader, McKinney, Gonzalez, Sheehan and Gravel would all have to be behind an effort to build another progressive party for it to be worth the effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Jass</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/cindy-sheehan-plans-to-start-a-new-party-to-be-called-the-first-party/comment-page-1/#comment-18302</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Jass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3216#comment-18302</guid>
		<description>Why doesn&#039;t she just join the Peace &amp; Freedom Party or the Green Party? Is her ego too big to fit into those parties?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t she just join the Peace &amp; Freedom Party or the Green Party? Is her ego too big to fit into those parties?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie cannoli</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/cindy-sheehan-plans-to-start-a-new-party-to-be-called-the-first-party/comment-page-1/#comment-18280</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie cannoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3216#comment-18280</guid>
		<description>First, but perhaps not fast. 

If someone starts the Last Party, would it last?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, but perhaps not fast. </p>
<p>If someone starts the Last Party, would it last?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimDavidson</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/cindy-sheehan-plans-to-start-a-new-party-to-be-called-the-first-party/comment-page-1/#comment-18278</link>
		<dc:creator>JimDavidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3216#comment-18278</guid>
		<description>So, Cindy is starting &quot;the party of the first part,&quot; huh?  Well, the lawyers will love her.

Let me get this one out of the way.  &quot;The First shall be last.&quot;

Okay, I&#039;m done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Cindy is starting &#8220;the party of the first part,&#8221; huh?  Well, the lawyers will love her.</p>
<p>Let me get this one out of the way.  &#8220;The First shall be last.&#8221;</p>
<p>Okay, I&#8217;m done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattSwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/cindy-sheehan-plans-to-start-a-new-party-to-be-called-the-first-party/comment-page-1/#comment-18272</link>
		<dc:creator>MattSwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3216#comment-18272</guid>
		<description>The Peace and Freedom party has the coolest name in the third party pantheon, no question about it.  The LP could make it close if they ever wake up and start calling themselves the Liberty Party, or even the Gold Party, but as it stands, it isn&#039;t even close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Peace and Freedom party has the coolest name in the third party pantheon, no question about it.  The LP could make it close if they ever wake up and start calling themselves the Liberty Party, or even the Gold Party, but as it stands, it isn&#8217;t even close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie cannoli</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/cindy-sheehan-plans-to-start-a-new-party-to-be-called-the-first-party/comment-page-1/#comment-18262</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie cannoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3216#comment-18262</guid>
		<description>The key question is whether it would do that, or just add yet another splinter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key question is whether it would do that, or just add yet another splinter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Levin</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/cindy-sheehan-plans-to-start-a-new-party-to-be-called-the-first-party/comment-page-1/#comment-18261</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3216#comment-18261</guid>
		<description>I mean, if it was a party formed in order to unite people and replace other parties (ie, the Green Party, maybe the various Socialist Parties, and others), and it could do that effectively, then it would be worth starting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean, if it was a party formed in order to unite people and replace other parties (ie, the Green Party, maybe the various Socialist Parties, and others), and it could do that effectively, then it would be worth starting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Levin</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/cindy-sheehan-plans-to-start-a-new-party-to-be-called-the-first-party/comment-page-1/#comment-18260</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3216#comment-18260</guid>
		<description>Ah, you beat me to posting this.

I&#039;ve heard rumors that other independent candidates around the nation are either thinking about starting their own party, or thinking of joining Sheehan in starting this party.  I&#039;m not sure which one, as the rumors (I&#039;m stressing that it&#039;s not fact) didn&#039;t specify.

I&#039;ve got to agree that starting another party is a bad move for nearly anyone.  At this point, it just further splits a movement.  The only way I could see doing it is if a lot of prominent independents and third partisans got behind the party and made it a (relatively) big deal from the moment it started.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, you beat me to posting this.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard rumors that other independent candidates around the nation are either thinking about starting their own party, or thinking of joining Sheehan in starting this party.  I&#8217;m not sure which one, as the rumors (I&#8217;m stressing that it&#8217;s not fact) didn&#8217;t specify.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got to agree that starting another party is a bad move for nearly anyone.  At this point, it just further splits a movement.  The only way I could see doing it is if a lot of prominent independents and third partisans got behind the party and made it a (relatively) big deal from the moment it started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/cindy-sheehan-plans-to-start-a-new-party-to-be-called-the-first-party/comment-page-1/#comment-18235</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3216#comment-18235</guid>
		<description>Paulie,

To be fair, the libertarians did take it over in &#039;72...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paulie,</p>
<p>To be fair, the libertarians did take it over in &#8217;72&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie cannoli</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/cindy-sheehan-plans-to-start-a-new-party-to-be-called-the-first-party/comment-page-1/#comment-18225</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie cannoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3216#comment-18225</guid>
		<description>I like the name Peace and Freedom (too bad the libertarians lost it to the socialist faction in &#039;74). 

Calling a third party The First Party won&#039;t change the reality of the uphill struggle it will face in getting organized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the name Peace and Freedom (too bad the libertarians lost it to the socialist faction in &#8217;74). </p>
<p>Calling a third party The First Party won&#8217;t change the reality of the uphill struggle it will face in getting organized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/cindy-sheehan-plans-to-start-a-new-party-to-be-called-the-first-party/comment-page-1/#comment-18221</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=3216#comment-18221</guid>
		<description>This is a dumb move, it will only serve to further split the progressives. The Green Party is obviously quickly becoming defunct and sort of the minority-rights party. The Peace and Freedom Party should take the mantle of Ralph Nader and most progressives should coalesce behind THAT national effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a dumb move, it will only serve to further split the progressives. The Green Party is obviously quickly becoming defunct and sort of the minority-rights party. The Peace and Freedom Party should take the mantle of Ralph Nader and most progressives should coalesce behind THAT national effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

