Comments on: Veracity of Ron Paul’s endorsement of Chuck Baldwin for President being questioned

By: Ross Levin

Ross Levin — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:31:45 +0000

Hey, I had homework to do!

Plus, someone called and no one picked up, so we waited until today.

By: paulie cannoli

paulie cannoli — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:01:33 +0000

Probably unnecessary at this point. It’s off page one, and any question has long been settled by now.

If any of the other writers here still think it’s important enough, I’ll accept an edit by them.

By: darolew

darolew — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:50:47 +0000

^Maybe that should be edited into the article.

By: antiwar

antiwar — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:48:57 +0000

Don’t call Ron’s office congressional office!

It is against the law for his congressional staffers to discuss who he supports for President or any other aspect of his non-congressional business.

The Campaign for Liberty is his official political (campaign) organization. The people who work there are his political staffers. They speak for him regarding political issues. Here is that number: 612-559-6742.

Stop bothering his congressional staff!

By: G.E.

G.E. — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 05:09:14 +0000

I think this dude should be our first ban for creating fake aliases in order to intentionally spread lies.

By: paulie cannoli

paulie cannoli — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 05:07:57 +0000

I received a facebook reply from Rachel Mills confirming the post.

Hadn’t thought of that. Good job, thanks!

By: darolew

darolew — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 04:26:10 +0000

I think the endorsement is pretty obviously genuine.

By: kiddleddee

kiddleddee — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 04:24:00 +0000

I received a facebook reply from Rachel Mills confirming the post.

By: paulie cannoli

paulie cannoli — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 03:49:24 +0000

I simply canâ€™t believe that Iâ€™m watching four or five people that would otherwise seem to care a great deal about the claims being made here go through some thirty-one, count â€˜em, 31 posts making excuses about why they personally just canâ€™t make a phone call to confirm them.

Obviously you didn’t actually read those comments.

I was in a library, and several other people here were at work, so could not all.

Eventually, some people did call, but it was after office hours.

With the confirmation in a CP press release, it now seems even less likely that Jerry is right, but I’ll still call the Ron Paul office in the morning to erase any lingering shadow of doubt.

By: kkassam

kkassam — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 02:47:32 +0000

Ok, I see it now â€“ but I still don’t see it on baldwin08.com .

By: Trent Hill

Trent Hill — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 02:46:18 +0000

kkassam,

Email the IPR email address

Contact.IPR@gmail.com
And just say “Hi Trent, contact me at this email address” and ill get back to you in a few.

By: Trent Hill

Trent Hill — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 02:45:22 +0000

johnlowell,

The ones who wont call, wont because we know the truth. The ones doing the urging are busy.

By: G.E.

G.E. — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 02:45:17 +0000

The endorsement is mentioned at the CP site.

Make the call yourself, johnlowell. You don’t own me.

By: kkassam

kkassam — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 02:43:17 +0000

Trent, why no mention yet of the Ron Paul endorsement at the CP site?

Also, what’s your email address? I have a question I’d like to ask you.

By: johnlowell

johnlowell — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 02:31:57 +0000

I simply can’t believe that I’m watching four or five people that would otherwise seem to care a great deal about the claims being made here go through some thirty-one, count ‘em, 31 posts making excuses about why they personally just can’t make a phone call to confirm them. What squirlishness!If you’re so concerned about the truth of the matter, confirm or disconfirm the claim for God’s sake. Either its true or it isn’t, but I’m getting the very distinct impression that a good bit more than the truth is involved for you folks, pride perhaps?