Comments on: Scotty Boman on Ron Paul Endorsing Chuck Baldwin

By: paulie cannoli

paulie cannoli — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000

All earthly governments are under the control of Satan. Otherwise would Satan’s offer to Jesus to reign on earth have been a real temptation? Wouldn’t Jesus be in a position to know if Satan was lying?

http://praxeology.net/anarchist-jesus.pdf

By: InQuestForTruth

InQuestForTruth — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 03:45:50 +0000

Baldwin is 100% behind his presidential platform. Read his newsletters and watch his videos over the years. Theocratic? Chuck will stick to the Constitution. For those who are agnostic, like it or not, God does exist, therefore the universe is a theocracy, and like it or not, all nations on earth are under the authority, blessing, and punishment of the Almighty God. Can you handle the Truth? Click http://www.erichlukas.com and surf with an open mind for challenge.
May God bless the endeavors of Chuck Baldwin, Ron Paul, and like-minded leaders – for the sake of our nation and world.

By: darolew

darolew — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 05:25:48 +0000

“Baldwin would be a heck of a lot better than McCain or Obama.”

So would a box of Tic Tacs. It’s a pretty low bar to clear.

By: TheOriginalAndy

TheOriginalAndy — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:34:56 +0000

Baldwin would be a heck of a lot better than McCain or Obama.

By: Coming Back to the LP

Coming Back to the LP — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:29:12 +0000

We can trust that Balwin would be a terrible theocrat if elected.

It’s instinct.

A scorpion riding on a turtle’s back across a river …

By: iamanamerican

iamanamerican — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:45:15 +0000

Baldwin is Better than Barr.
TrustWorthy. Not a flip-flopper.

By: rdupuy

rdupuy — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:26:08 +0000

I thought libertarians believed words mean something. WinstonSmith is not ‘whoring for free’

Nevermind that the word implies a money transaction, that it would be more apropos to accuse a paid Barr staffer of ‘whoring’ than the idea of ‘whoring for free’.

Nevermind all that, because its just a rude, knee jerk response.

WinstonSmith, I agree with you wholeheartedly.

These critics of Bob Barr remind me of the critics of Harry Browne, the critics of Marrou.

In the end the LP, as it grows, will leave behind these critics. Parties grow, with people who know how parties work.

In the end we should show respect for the presidential electors of the LP – they were voted in by the LP membership. They selected Bob Barr.

And all these vague criticisms don’t amount to any real criticism of Bob Barr. He speaks the message of Libertarianism, and does so very eloquently, and no person, and I mean no other person right now is doing a better job or reaching more people.

By: BrianHoltz

BrianHoltz — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 07:24:44 +0000

Great answer by Boman.

By: WinstonSmith

WinstonSmith — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 06:46:34 +0000

Winston Smith – If youâ€™re not on the Barr payroll, then youâ€™re whoring for free.

I’m whoring for the advancement of Liberty. I see nothing wrong with that.

By: paulie cannoli

paulie cannoli — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 06:40:56 +0000

VTF? WTF? VTV?

By: G.E.

G.E. — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 06:39:40 +0000

Kudos to you, VTF. I wish you were in my district.

By: VTV

VTV — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 06:28:01 +0000

Well you can be sure G.E. there won’t be any statements about me voting for Barr.

I have already made it clear to anyone who asks my feelings on this.

By: paulie cannoli

paulie cannoli — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 06:19:19 +0000

Winston Smith – If youâ€™re not on the Barr payroll, then youâ€™re whoring for free.

http://lastfreevoice.wordpress.com/2008/08/01/im-a-whore-and-a-glory-hole-slut/

By: TheOriginalAndy

TheOriginalAndy — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 06:00:59 +0000

I’m a 12 year member of the Libertarian Party. I voted for Harry Browne in 1996 and 2000 and I voted for Michael Badnarik in 2004.

I do not plan to vote for Bob Barr. I gave Barr a chance before and after the Convention and he failed to win me over.

I do not believe in “my party right or wrong.” This is a big part of what is wrong with the Democrats and Republicans and I don’t want to see this mentality infecting the Libertarian Party. I consider voting for Barr to be rewarding the party for making a bad choice and I don’t plan on doing this. It is time for some tough love.

By: G.E.

G.E. — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:48:43 +0000

Winston Smith – If you’re not on the Barr payroll, then you’re whoring for free.

By: darolew

darolew — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:30:17 +0000

“Barr has been the only choice for true Liberty this whole election.”

Liberty doesn’t have much to do with elections.

By: paulie cannoli

paulie cannoli — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 04:51:22 +0000

IE 2+2=5

By: WinstonSmith

WinstonSmith — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 04:50:38 +0000

Barr has been the only choice for true Liberty this whole election. Nothing has changed because he shunned a Republicrat.

By: paulie cannoli

paulie cannoli — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 04:32:35 +0000

I like Tom Blanton’s “Potty Party” idea.

Go in the voting booth, take a leak, and leave.

By: darolew

darolew — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 04:30:28 +0000

“Iâ€™m very disappointed with Scottyâ€™s decision to publicly declare his intent to vote for Barr.”

Meh, it seems quite a few people are planning to vote for Barr even though they don’t really support him (e.g. David Nolan).

Even though Barr has proven himself a filthy worm and an all-around idiot, I still might vote for him if his campaign cuts the crap for the rest of the cycle. (Or I could go back to my coin-flip idea.)