<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ron Paul vs. Chuck Baldwin: Economics and free trade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/09/ron-paul-vs-chuck-baldwin-economics-and-free-trade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/09/ron-paul-vs-chuck-baldwin-economics-and-free-trade/</link>
	<description>Covering America's third parties and independent candidates since May 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:12:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve LaBianca</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/09/ron-paul-vs-chuck-baldwin-economics-and-free-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-16379</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve LaBianca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=2711#comment-16379</guid>
		<description>Though the LP platform is better than the CP platform on &quot;free trade&quot;, Bob Barr is nearly as much of a lightweight on economics as Baldwin.
If we bring in  W.A.R., we add another mental midget on economics (W.A.R. stated on a radio interview that he supported a fiat money standard and a Gold standard . . . obviously he was coached to say the &quot;terms&quot;, but has no idea what either standard encompasses)

Barr, as a nearly lifelong  government employee U.S. attorney and CIA)  has spent neither the time or effort to learn economics . .  and why should he have? He was a part of the government machine. Free market economics and the market is the antidote to government action, of which Barr has been a part of most of his adult life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though the LP platform is better than the CP platform on &#8220;free trade&#8221;, Bob Barr is nearly as much of a lightweight on economics as Baldwin.<br />
If we bring in  W.A.R., we add another mental midget on economics (W.A.R. stated on a radio interview that he supported a fiat money standard and a Gold standard . . . obviously he was coached to say the &#8220;terms&#8221;, but has no idea what either standard encompasses)</p>
<p>Barr, as a nearly lifelong  government employee U.S. attorney and CIA)  has spent neither the time or effort to learn economics . .  and why should he have? He was a part of the government machine. Free market economics and the market is the antidote to government action, of which Barr has been a part of most of his adult life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/09/ron-paul-vs-chuck-baldwin-economics-and-free-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-16336</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=2711#comment-16336</guid>
		<description>GE,

It has every right,so long as it delegates can defend said positions.

If you are looking for an invitation--I&#039;v got friends who can extend it formally. If I thought the CP was worth saving, I&#039;d have initiated said invasion long ago--it would have been easy. Stacking the deck in FL, GA, MS, MI, IL, and several others could have been accomplished very easily. Add that to the already liberty-loving minorities in TX, NV, CA (the non-Noonan faction), ID and elsewhere--and that ship is sunk.

Fortunately, I dont think its a path worth walking. It could be done, and easily, but to what end? At the end of it all, you&#039;d have a smaller base, a competeing party made up of the former non-constitutionalists, no financial backing, and a party born in fire---not exactly a great starting point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GE,</p>
<p>It has every right,so long as it delegates can defend said positions.</p>
<p>If you are looking for an invitation&#8211;I&#8217;v got friends who can extend it formally. If I thought the CP was worth saving, I&#8217;d have initiated said invasion long ago&#8211;it would have been easy. Stacking the deck in FL, GA, MS, MI, IL, and several others could have been accomplished very easily. Add that to the already liberty-loving minorities in TX, NV, CA (the non-Noonan faction), ID and elsewhere&#8211;and that ship is sunk.</p>
<p>Fortunately, I dont think its a path worth walking. It could be done, and easily, but to what end? At the end of it all, you&#8217;d have a smaller base, a competeing party made up of the former non-constitutionalists, no financial backing, and a party born in fire&#8212;not exactly a great starting point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.E.</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/09/ron-paul-vs-chuck-baldwin-economics-and-free-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-16335</link>
		<dc:creator>G.E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=2711#comment-16335</guid>
		<description>hmmmm....

I don&#039;t see this in the offing, though.

Perhaps if we were invited by whatever contingent of anti-protectionist, neutral on gays, less hawkish on immigration constitutionalists exists, we&#039;d give it a go. But after seeing a neocon takeover of our own party, I don&#039;t think we want to do the same to the CP, which has every right in the world to advance anti-capitalism and social puritanism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmmm&#8230;.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see this in the offing, though.</p>
<p>Perhaps if we were invited by whatever contingent of anti-protectionist, neutral on gays, less hawkish on immigration constitutionalists exists, we&#8217;d give it a go. But after seeing a neocon takeover of our own party, I don&#8217;t think we want to do the same to the CP, which has every right in the world to advance anti-capitalism and social puritanism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/09/ron-paul-vs-chuck-baldwin-economics-and-free-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-16332</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=2711#comment-16332</guid>
		<description>rdupuy,

If libertarians of the Ron Paul stripe took over the CP--it&#039;d be a great thing. They&#039;d find themselves fully welcomed by the members in PA, CT, LA, TX, ID, CA, and NV--and I suspect this would constitute a majority. The conservative non-constitutionalists based out of most other states would likely just cut off their financial investments and ballot access would suffer seriously. Still--for Ron Paul-types to fully takeover the Constitution Party would be fitting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rdupuy,</p>
<p>If libertarians of the Ron Paul stripe took over the CP&#8211;it&#8217;d be a great thing. They&#8217;d find themselves fully welcomed by the members in PA, CT, LA, TX, ID, CA, and NV&#8211;and I suspect this would constitute a majority. The conservative non-constitutionalists based out of most other states would likely just cut off their financial investments and ballot access would suffer seriously. Still&#8211;for Ron Paul-types to fully takeover the Constitution Party would be fitting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rdupuy</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/09/ron-paul-vs-chuck-baldwin-economics-and-free-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-16328</link>
		<dc:creator>rdupuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=2711#comment-16328</guid>
		<description>Now we will see how much Ron Paul&#039;s endorsement  is worth.  

I expect its a net positive.  But the CP is so at odds with Libertarian philosophy, that if Ron Paul does convince Libertarians to take over this party, its good news and bad news.

I would imagine that current leadership would be out, the platform rewritten, by 2012.  

Chuck might find he&#039;s now got too much of a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now we will see how much Ron Paul&#8217;s endorsement  is worth.  </p>
<p>I expect its a net positive.  But the CP is so at odds with Libertarian philosophy, that if Ron Paul does convince Libertarians to take over this party, its good news and bad news.</p>
<p>I would imagine that current leadership would be out, the platform rewritten, by 2012.  </p>
<p>Chuck might find he&#8217;s now got too much of a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie cannoli</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/09/ron-paul-vs-chuck-baldwin-economics-and-free-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-16294</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie cannoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=2711#comment-16294</guid>
		<description>I need to figure out why they don&#039;t pay me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to figure out why they don&#8217;t pay me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/09/ron-paul-vs-chuck-baldwin-economics-and-free-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-16292</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=2711#comment-16292</guid>
		<description>Nope, sure didnt.

Now I see why people pay you to write.

I just need to figure out why people pay ME...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, sure didnt.</p>
<p>Now I see why people pay you to write.</p>
<p>I just need to figure out why people pay ME&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.E.</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/09/ron-paul-vs-chuck-baldwin-economics-and-free-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-16286</link>
		<dc:creator>G.E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=2711#comment-16286</guid>
		<description>You know I wrote it, right, Trent? :)

Check my archive at that site for more good stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know I wrote it, right, Trent? <img src='http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Check my archive at that site for more good stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/09/ron-paul-vs-chuck-baldwin-economics-and-free-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-16285</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=2711#comment-16285</guid>
		<description>Yea,this is a good article. Contrasting positions of Paul and Baldwin are good. Contrasting Paul and the CP platform is...pointless. He didnt endorse the CP, he endorsed Baldwin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea,this is a good article. Contrasting positions of Paul and Baldwin are good. Contrasting Paul and the CP platform is&#8230;pointless. He didnt endorse the CP, he endorsed Baldwin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HumbleTravis</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/09/ron-paul-vs-chuck-baldwin-economics-and-free-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-16272</link>
		<dc:creator>HumbleTravis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=2711#comment-16272</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this - I consider these differences more important than the disputes over the differences in the LP &amp; CP platforms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this &#8211; I consider these differences more important than the disputes over the differences in the LP &amp; CP platforms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

