On the eve of a like Federal Reserve takeover of the once-mighty AIG, Bob Barr has issued a press release calling on government to “take future taxpayer bailouts off the table.”
The full release is printed below:
Atlanta, GA – “The bill is coming due for years of reckless federal spending,†says Bob Barr, the Libertarian Party candidate for president. “Yet Washington politicians have trouble going cold turkey on more corporate welfare and business bailouts.”
Although Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson refused to bail out Lehman Brothers, he stated, ‘Don’t read [that position] as no more’ government support; however, Barr says this is precisely what government officials need to say.”
“The mere possibility of a bailout will discourage companies and markets from adjusting in the future,†explains Barr. “Analysts say that Lehman Brothers had more trouble attempting to raise money because of expectations created by the $30 billion Bear Stearns bailout.  The fact that investors viewed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as having an implicit government guarantee encouraged irresponsible behavior by both the organizations and private investors,†Barr adds.
“Now that the consequences of this behavior have become so obvious, American companies and markets look a lot less attractive to foreign investors,†notes Barr. “And the prospect of more multi-billion dollar bailouts makes federal debt a more dubious investment. In fact, Moody’s Investors Services has announced it is considering downgrading federal bonds because of the federal government’s growing financial liabilities. Every new bailout adds to the total,†Barr warns.
“Similarly misguided was the $300 billion housing bailout, which rewards people and companies for their irresponsible decisions. It also slows down the inevitable drop in housing prices, keeping homes on the market longer. That makes it harder for people who have been responsible with their finances to buy a house,†notes Barr. “Indeed, the most obvious victims of government bail-outs always are the common citizens who get stuck paying other people’s bills.â€
“Unfortunately, those bills just keep climbing. Yet Senators John McCain and Barack Obama spend more time arguing about lipstick on pigs than about how to cut the deficit, pay down the national debt, or deal with the coming entitlements crisis,†says Barr. “But without responsible leadership in Washington, we will face more and worse economic crises,†Barr warns.
“Only Bob Barr and the Libertarian Party are willing to address the most critical issues facing the nation. For the Republicans and Democrats, every election is politics as usual,†observes Barr. “So it is in 2008. The American people recognize that America desperately needs change.  But change will come only if they stop voting for the status quo,†explains Barr.
Libertarian Party presidential candidate Bob Barr represented the 7th District of Georgia in the U. S. House of Representatives from 1995 to 2003.

This is the correct Libertarian position and it is no “flip flop.”
In some cases the government may have to spend additional money to end a losing position. It is not unlibertarian to spend money in such a circumstance.
For example. To end our committment in Iraq, we would have to spend money to bring our troops and equipment home. We should spend money to clean up messes we have made, dig up landmines etc. It costs money to get out.
“Mae and Mac” are quasi-government entities. It could cost some money to get out of them just like it will cost money to get out of Iraq or to close bases and bring troops home from other countries.
Good for Bob Barr.
AIG to the tune of $85 billion is rediculous.
Telling the relevant truth = bias to many Barr backers.
I don’t see a problem pointing out that Barr had previously advocated some kind of government assistance (since “government created the problem”.) It’s not the first or last time Barr has changed/”clarified” his stance on an issue.
The most relevant point, however, is he’s saying the “correct”/”libertarian” thing right now about this very “hot” and troubling subject, unlike the duopoly presidential candidates.
Fair point, Deran. But we should also have the right to opt out of paying for them. We have no such right when the Federal Reserve can steal from the poor to fund its operations for the benefit of the rich.
I think if we’re paying for them, we ought to take ownership of them outright.
Yes. Of course I couldn’t mention that very relevant piece of information in the article, because it would provoke protests of “bias.” Telling the relevant truth = bias to many Barr backers.
What’s more, how can he be against the horrible Fed takeover of AIG? Barr previously stated he wanted the Fed to have MORE OVERSIGHT power… And then he signed the C4L “We Agree” statement? WTF?
Gee, and I seem to recall that not long ago, Barr was all in favor of bailing out Fanny and Freddy….
Flip – flop…
ART