Comments on: Boston Tea Party Presidential candidate Charles Jay answers Obama-McCain debate questions

By: donald raymond lake

donald raymond lake — Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:03:24 +0000

And the original viewer ship. My circle pretty much clicked their way to a non debate channel or turned the idiot box off.

Oh, the Ron Powell, FCC gods got back at me. within minutes of ignoring the unwatched debates I became the proud owner of a vintage black television. Not black and white, just black. Biggest radio on the block…..

By: paulie cannoli

paulie cannoli — Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:02:12 +0000

Because a bunch of people kept bitching about it.

A link to the unabridged version remains.

By: JimDavidson

JimDavidson — Sun, 28 Sep 2008 05:20:38 +0000

Why “pair” or, perhaps, pare, this down? It seems like relevant news.

And the Boston Tea Party continues to grow.

By: Ross Levin

Ross Levin — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:58:42 +0000

We linked to Barr’s and McKinney’s responses beforehand. If Jay had done a video response, we would have done the same thing.

By: paulie cannoli

paulie cannoli — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:33:50 +0000

Thanks Mike T.

I’ll be posting that a little later if someone doesn’t get to it first.

Need to take a break from the computer.

By: paulie cannoli

paulie cannoli — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:32:23 +0000

D.) are you also going to post Barr, Nader, McKinney, and Baldwinâ€™s complete responses to the debate questions?

If not (which you certainly shouldnâ€™t) then why do the same for Jayâ€¦?

Whatever. I trimmed most of it.

Any more complaints?

By: Mike Theodore

Mike Theodore — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:24:31 +0000

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Bq_6XMzuGY

Gonzales’s reply, via Youtube subscription.

By: Trent Hill

Trent Hill — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:23:18 +0000

svf,

I’v not seen any of their responses yet. There is no video or real transcript of Barr’s replies yet.

By: svf

svf — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:21:26 +0000

D.) are you also going to post Barr, Nader, McKinney, and Baldwin’s complete responses to the debate questions?

If not (which you certainly shouldn’t) then why do the same for Jay…?

By: Trent Hill

Trent Hill — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:15:42 +0000

A.) didnt know.
B.) *shrug*, I figured it’d be better to drive traffic to Jay’s site for the full article.
C.) Nope.

By: Mike Theodore

Mike Theodore — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:14:31 +0000

I’m with Cannoli on this one.

By: paulie cannoli

paulie cannoli — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:13:14 +0000

A) We do have permission to reprint
B) What difference does it make, only a small portion appears on the front page
C) Feel free to edit if you feel strongly about it

By: Trent Hill

Trent Hill — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:12:02 +0000

Not pissy–it just makes for a very long post. Posting a small portion which then links to the actual blog would be better. Besides, I’m not sure we have permission to reprint it in full here.

By: Mike Theodore

Mike Theodore — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:11:00 +0000

Would you rather he post a small portion?

Why’s everyone pissy about this?

By: Trent Hill

Trent Hill — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:10:44 +0000

Yea,let’s get this thing paired down.

By: AnthonyD

AnthonyD — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:09:25 +0000

Did anyone ask if Charles boinked his running mate from his last presidential run?

By: svf

svf — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:09:02 +0000

did you have to post THE WHOLE DAMN THING…?

By: Mike Theodore

Mike Theodore — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:07:02 +0000

Did anyone ask him not to?

By: Former LP Life Member

Former LP Life Member — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:05:17 +0000

Did anyone ask Jay to answer the questions?