contact.ipr@gmail.com


Boston Tea Party Presidential candidate Charles Jay answers Obama-McCain debate questions

September 27th, 2008 · 19 Comments

Posted at cj08.com

(I wasn’t invited to Friday night’s presidential debate, but you knew I was going to weigh in anyway. My “participation” comes in the way of interspersing my responses into the actual text of the debate, which you will see below. All of those responses to the questions asked by moderator Jim Lehrer are in bold type. We ditched the rules for this one, and I used remarks in the rebuttal process as I felt were necessary; for the most part, since I had the advantage of being the last to answer, so to speak, I did single responses. This transcript is so long that it is being divided into two parts – the first is the part of the debate that explored financial issues, namely the bailout, which running mate Tom Knapp probably more accurately calls the “Ripoff”. The part that explores Iraq and foreign policy will come later on )

LEHRER: Good evening from the Ford Center for the Performing Arts at the University of Mississippi in Oxford. I’m Jim Lehrer of the NewsHour on PBS, and I welcome you to the first of the 2008 presidential debates between the Republican nominee, Senator John McCain of Arizona, and the Democratic nominee, Senator Barack Obama of Illinois.

(And the Boston Tea Party nominee, Charles Jay)

The Commission on Presidential Debates is the sponsor of this event and the three other presidential and vice presidential debates coming in October.

Tonight’s will primarily be about foreign policy and national security, which, by definition, includes the global financial crisis. It will be divided roughly into nine-minute segments.

Direct exchanges between the candidates and moderator follow-ups are permitted after each candidate has two minutes to answer the lead question in an order determined by a coin toss.

The specific subjects and questions were chosen by me. They have not been shared or cleared with anyone.

The audience here in the hall has promised to remain silent, no cheers, no applause, no noise of any kind, except right now, as we welcome Senators Obama and McCain.

(APPLAUSE)

Let me begin with something General Eisenhower said in his 1952 presidential campaign. Quote, “We must achieve both security and solvency. In fact, the foundation of military strength is economic strength,” end quote.

With that in mind, the first lead question.

Gentlemen, at this very moment tonight, where do you stand on the financial recovery plan?

First response to you, Senator Obama. You have two minutes.

OBAMA: Well, thank you very much, Jim, and thanks to the commission and the University of Mississippi, Ole Miss, for hosting us tonight. I can’t think of a more important time for us to talk about the future of the country.

You know, we are at a defining moment in our history. Our nation is involved in two wars, and we are going through the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.

And although we’ve heard a lot about Wall Street, those of you on Main Street I think have been struggling for a while, and you recognize that this could have an impact on all sectors of the economy.

And you’re wondering, how’s it going to affect me? How’s it going to affect my job? How’s it going to affect my house? How’s it going to affect my retirement savings or my ability to send my children to college?

So we have to move swiftly, and we have to move wisely. And I’ve put forward a series of proposals that make sure that we protect taxpayers as we engage in this important rescue effort.

Number one, we’ve got to make sure that we’ve got oversight over this whole process; $700 billion, potentially, is a lot of money.

Number two, we’ve got to make sure that taxpayers, when they are putting their money at risk, have the possibility of getting that money back and gains, if the market — and when the market returns.

Number three, we’ve got to make sure that none of that money is going to pad CEO bank accounts or to promote golden parachutes.

And, number four, we’ve got to make sure that we’re helping homeowners, because the root problem here has to do with the foreclosures that are taking place all across the country.

Now, we also have to recognize that this is a final verdict on eight years of failed economic policies promoted by George Bush, supported by Senator McCain, a theory that basically says that we can shred regulations and consumer protections and give more and more to the most, and somehow prosperity will trickle down.

It hasn’t worked. And I think that the fundamentals of the economy have to be measured by whether or not the middle class is getting a fair shake. That’s why I’m running for president, and that’s what I hope we’re going to be talking about tonight.

LEHRER: Senator McCain, two minutes.

MCCAIN: Well, thank you, Jim. And thanks to everybody.

And I do have a sad note tonight. Senator Kennedy is in the hospital. He’s a dear and beloved friend to all of us. Our thoughts and prayers go out to the lion of the Senate.

I also want to thank the University of Mississippi for hosting us tonight.

And, Jim, I — I’ve been not feeling too great about a lot of things lately. So have a lot of Americans who are facing challenges. But I’m feeling a little better tonight, and I’ll tell you why.

Because as we’re here tonight in this debate, we are seeing, for the first time in a long time, Republicans and Democrats together, sitting down, trying to work out a solution to this fiscal crisis that we’re in.

And have no doubt about the magnitude of this crisis. And we’re not talking about failure of institutions on Wall Street. We’re talking about failures on Main Street, and people who will lose their jobs, and their credits, and their homes, if we don’t fix the greatest fiscal crisis, probably in — certainly in our time, and I’ve been around a little while. But the point is — the point is, we have finally seen Republicans and Democrats sitting down and negotiating together and coming up with a package.

This package has transparency in it. It has to have accountability and oversight. It has to have options for loans to failing businesses, rather than the government taking over those loans. We have to — it has to have a package with a number of other essential elements to it.

And, yes, I went back to Washington, and I met with my Republicans in the House of Representatives. And they weren’t part of the negotiations, and I understand that. And it was the House Republicans that decided that they would be part of the solution to this problem.

But I want to emphasize one point to all Americans tonight. This isn’t the beginning of the end of this crisis. This is the end of the beginning, if we come out with a package that will keep these institutions stable.

And we’ve got a lot of work to do. And we’ve got to create jobs. And one of the areas, of course, is to eliminate our dependence on foreign oil.

———————————————————

JAY: I really wish that we could stop this now-tired rhetoric in which we pit “Wall Street” against “Main Street.” We have to realize that this panic has been caused by recklessness on the part of both Wall Street AND Main Street. Until you understand that, you’re never going to be in a position to improve the financial atmosphere at all.

We’ve got greed, lack of discipline, bad judgment, foolishness, and something everyone seems to want to stay away from here – fraud – at work. Let’s not mischaracterize things either. Homeowners who have lost their homes may not have had the ability to pay, but some of them KNEW they didn’t have the ability to pay before taking the loan. And plenty of lenders knew that, but felt no sense of responsibility because ultimately they didn’t feel a responsibility for their payment. In some way, lenders defrauded borrowers. Borrowers defrauded lenders. Those “masters of the universe” on Wall Street thought they were a little smarter than they really were. These are people to be bailed out? Yes, eventually out of jail maybe, and I would demand that an investigation be conducted to punish those who acted in a fraudulent manner. And that can send a powerful message about how this system is going to conduct itself in the future. You don’t need a whole world of regulations. Just protect innocent parties from fraud.

And Mr. Obama, you may wish to use this financial crisis to your political advantage, blaming it on Senator McCain through President Bush, but you need to be honest with the people whose interests you purport to be looking out for and admit that you are, in a move that is ostensibly populist in nature, willing to offer that golden parachute to everyone who exploited the system and failed, as well as those who tried to buy what they may have known they couldn’t afford. The problem, of course, and this goes for both you and Senator McCain, is that you don’t really know which way the wind is blowing right now, so you’re not sure who you should be pandering to.

Capitalism isn’t just about profit. It’s also about risk. And when you take the risk out of the equation, shifting that to the taxpayer, you are promoting something that isn’t America. And ultimately, the American people, if they have a brain in their head, aren’t going to stand for it. Perhaps you’d be more comfortable a little south of here or over in Europe. You’d get more than your share of votes.

Read the rest here

Filed Under: Non-left/right parties

19 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Former LP Life Member // Sep 27, 2008 at 3:05 pm

    Did anyone ask Jay to answer the questions?

  • 2 Mike Theodore // Sep 27, 2008 at 3:07 pm

    Did anyone ask him not to?

  • 3 svf // Sep 27, 2008 at 3:09 pm

    did you have to post THE WHOLE DAMN THING…?

  • 4 AnthonyD // Sep 27, 2008 at 3:09 pm

    Did anyone ask if Charles boinked his running mate from his last presidential run?

  • 5 Trent Hill // Sep 27, 2008 at 3:10 pm

    Yea,let’s get this thing paired down.

  • 6 Mike Theodore // Sep 27, 2008 at 3:11 pm

    Would you rather he post a small portion?

    Why’s everyone pissy about this?

  • 7 Trent Hill // Sep 27, 2008 at 3:12 pm

    Not pissy–it just makes for a very long post. Posting a small portion which then links to the actual blog would be better. Besides, I’m not sure we have permission to reprint it in full here.

  • 8 paulie cannoli // Sep 27, 2008 at 3:13 pm

    A) We do have permission to reprint
    B) What difference does it make, only a small portion appears on the front page
    C) Feel free to edit if you feel strongly about it

  • 9 Mike Theodore // Sep 27, 2008 at 3:14 pm

    I’m with Cannoli on this one.

  • 10 Trent Hill // Sep 27, 2008 at 3:15 pm

    A.) didnt know.
    B.) *shrug*, I figured it’d be better to drive traffic to Jay’s site for the full article.
    C.) Nope.

  • 11 svf // Sep 27, 2008 at 3:21 pm

    D.) are you also going to post Barr, Nader, McKinney, and Baldwin’s complete responses to the debate questions?

    If not (which you certainly shouldn’t) then why do the same for Jay…?

  • 12 Trent Hill // Sep 27, 2008 at 3:23 pm

    svf,

    I’v not seen any of their responses yet. There is no video or real transcript of Barr’s replies yet.

  • 13 Mike Theodore // Sep 27, 2008 at 3:24 pm

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Bq_6XMzuGY

    Gonzales’s reply, via Youtube subscription.

  • 14 paulie cannoli // Sep 27, 2008 at 3:32 pm

    D.) are you also going to post Barr, Nader, McKinney, and Baldwin’s complete responses to the debate questions?

    If not (which you certainly shouldn’t) then why do the same for Jay…?

    Whatever. I trimmed most of it.

    Any more complaints?

  • 15 paulie cannoli // Sep 27, 2008 at 3:33 pm

    Thanks Mike T.

    I’ll be posting that a little later if someone doesn’t get to it first.

    Need to take a break from the computer.

  • 16 Ross Levin // Sep 27, 2008 at 3:58 pm

    We linked to Barr’s and McKinney’s responses beforehand. If Jay had done a video response, we would have done the same thing.

  • 17 JimDavidson // Sep 28, 2008 at 1:20 am

    Why “pair” or, perhaps, pare, this down? It seems like relevant news.

    And the Boston Tea Party continues to grow.

  • 18 paulie cannoli // Sep 28, 2008 at 6:02 am

    Because a bunch of people kept bitching about it.

    A link to the unabridged version remains.

  • 19 donald raymond lake // Sep 28, 2008 at 3:03 pm

    And the original viewer ship. My circle pretty much clicked their way to a non debate channel or turned the idiot box off.

    Oh, the Ron Powell, FCC gods got back at me. within minutes of ignoring the unwatched debates I became the proud owner of a vintage black television. Not black and white, just black. Biggest radio on the block…..

Leave a Comment