UPDATE:
With all votes counted in the Libertarian U.S. House primary in Wisconsin’s Third District, Kevin Barrett has defeated Ben Olson III, 332 (59%) to 226 (41%).
EARLIER:
With 64% of the vote tallied in the Libertarian U.S. House primary in Wisconsin’s Third District, Kevin Barrett has 206 votes (62%) to Ben Olson III’s 125 (38%). See updates here.
14 responses so far ↓
1 Fred Church Ortiz // Sep 9, 2008 at 11:27 pm
wtf?
Reported Attack Site!
————————————–
This web site at http://www.wisconsinvote.org has been reported as an attack site and has been blocked based on your security preferences.
2 Mike Theodore // Sep 9, 2008 at 11:29 pm
Malicious stuff being downloaded? As if this thing isn’t loaded with viruses already!
3 Mike Gillis // Sep 9, 2008 at 11:33 pm
And attack site? You mean like LittleGreenFootballs or DailyKOS?
4 G.E. // Sep 9, 2008 at 11:34 pm
A great victory for Islamicism and Socialism.
5 Jason_Gatties // Sep 10, 2008 at 10:53 am
tickle me shocked, I thought for sure he would lose.
6 Thomas L. Knapp // Sep 10, 2008 at 10:58 am
GE,
Headline should have read “Barrett Defeats Libertarian in Wisconsin.”
Or maybe “Barrett succeeds in attempt to destroy Libertarian Party’s 2008 prospects in Wisconsin.”
7 Melty Rox // Sep 10, 2008 at 10:59 am
kinda special to see Libertarians compete in a primary for the same office. .. . so rarely happens, I’d take it as a good sign if it’d happen more.
8 Melty Rox // Sep 10, 2008 at 11:06 am
not to worry …..unwinnable seat
9 Sean Scallon // Sep 10, 2008 at 1:04 pm
The LP has two candidates for the State Assembly in my area which I will gladly support but I cannot support a Truther, even if he won fair and square.
10 Sean Scallon // Sep 10, 2008 at 1:06 pm
Speaking of Wisconsin, the Constitution Party announced yesterday that Chuck Baldwin will be on the Wisconsin ballot as an independent. The Party collected more 4,000 signatues where just 2,000 are required. This is a good state to be in non-major party politics.
11 Galileo Galilei // Sep 10, 2008 at 1:34 pm
Baldwin is a full-fledged, NWO Truther.
12 sunshinebatman // Sep 10, 2008 at 2:01 pm
At least Barrett and his campaign manager seem to have backed off using his campaign as a vehcile to elevate the COINTELPRO thermite-sniffing wing of the 9/11 movement.
13 G.E. // Sep 10, 2008 at 2:03 pm
Who’s crazier? A Islamo-fascist “Truther” who thinks social security is a “great program” and we need universal healthcare and anti-trust legislation, or a 9/11 Truther who supports CIA-man Bob Barr?
14 sunshinebatman // Sep 10, 2008 at 2:13 pm
What does that even mean, “9/11 truther”? Is the other option “9/11 liar”? And isn’t “islamo-fascist” a made-up neocon word?
Leave a Comment