It could be called the Nullifier Party. =P

Not that such a good idea would ever work out.

We could have a left-right-center unified national party to run federal candidates who agreed on decentralism.

I agree.

“And G.E. even predictably whipped out the pageviews again.”

Well, I think he (and the rest of the IPR writers) have a right to brag. They created a popular site in a short period of time.

Pageviews are important. If this site doesnt succeed, it ceases to be a viable outlet for third-party news. But large obviously we are doing our jobs. I intend to make our election day coverage the best in the nation.

Thanks for dissing me and the others while adding to that page count. You’re here for some reason and not at TPW, so thanks.

What a heroic and great act today to forge a “Populist Alliance” against the Power Elite.

Of course, the LP, dominated by libertine elitists, has no interest in such an alliance. But this, and not Milnes’s idiotic “Progressive” strategy is the future. We need to convince the Greens and the Naderites and, to a lesser extent, the Libertarians and Constitutionalists, that DECENTRALISM is the key issue. Knock everything down to the state level and let some states go the way of the Greens, other the way of the CP, etc. No more neocon/neoliberal centralized police state directing everyone’s lives.

This struck me as interesting:

“Although liberal Nader, conservative Barr and libertarian Paul are strange ideological bedfellows…”

The article identified Paul, a Republican, as libertarian while identifying Barr, a Libertarian, as a conservative. And who says the movement hasn’t made any progress?

Yea, and im hoping McCain appoints me to a cabinet position!

The light euphoric sensation you are experiencing is called “relief”.