<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Angela Keaton, Day 2: LNC gang continues efforts to cloak operations in secrecy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/09/angela-keaton-day-2-lnc-gang-continues-efforts-to-cloak-operations-in-secrecy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/09/angela-keaton-day-2-lnc-gang-continues-efforts-to-cloak-operations-in-secrecy/</link>
	<description>Covering America's third parties and independent candidates since May 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:58:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denver Delegate</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/09/angela-keaton-day-2-lnc-gang-continues-efforts-to-cloak-operations-in-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-11991</link>
		<dc:creator>Denver Delegate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=1939#comment-11991</guid>
		<description>Regarding Libertarian branding and the Barr campaign, my perception is that Barr is mentioned as the Libertarian presidential nominee -- or he mentions it himself, and confidently so -- at the outset of almost every broadcast media interview I&#039;ve seen him do.

I agree with Verney&#039;s strategy to make the campaign more inclusive, and aim to attract independent voters. Aside from a promotion of policy preferences in a generally libertarian direction (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reason.com/blog/show/127409.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;J.D. Tuccille&lt;/a&gt;) and potentially Naderizing McCain, future ballot access is a great goal for Barr&#039;s presidential campaign to have.

And for what it&#039;s worth, the homepage of McCain&#039;s web site carries no reference to the Republican Party right now.

Nor does the homepage on Obama&#039;s web site mention the Democratic Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Libertarian branding and the Barr campaign, my perception is that Barr is mentioned as the Libertarian presidential nominee &#8212; or he mentions it himself, and confidently so &#8212; at the outset of almost every broadcast media interview I&#8217;ve seen him do.</p>
<p>I agree with Verney&#8217;s strategy to make the campaign more inclusive, and aim to attract independent voters. Aside from a promotion of policy preferences in a generally libertarian direction (see <a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/127409.html" rel="nofollow">J.D. Tuccille</a>) and potentially Naderizing McCain, future ballot access is a great goal for Barr&#8217;s presidential campaign to have.</p>
<p>And for what it&#8217;s worth, the homepage of McCain&#8217;s web site carries no reference to the Republican Party right now.</p>
<p>Nor does the homepage on Obama&#8217;s web site mention the Democratic Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.E.</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/09/angela-keaton-day-2-lnc-gang-continues-efforts-to-cloak-operations-in-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-11982</link>
		<dc:creator>G.E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=1939#comment-11982</guid>
		<description>As pointed out by ElfNinosMom:

&lt;blockquote&gt;How interesting that Mary Ruwart told Richard Winger she did know about the NH lawsuit - and he used that as a basis for saying LFV had it wrong, and LNC was properly informed - now in LNC meeting says she didn&#039;t know about it until George Phillies told her, which is exactly what George told LFV.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Mr. Winger said the same thing about IPR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As pointed out by ElfNinosMom:</p>
<blockquote><p>How interesting that Mary Ruwart told Richard Winger she did know about the NH lawsuit &#8211; and he used that as a basis for saying LFV had it wrong, and LNC was properly informed &#8211; now in LNC meeting says she didn&#8217;t know about it until George Phillies told her, which is exactly what George told LFV.</p></blockquote>
<p>Mr. Winger said the same thing about IPR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

