<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IPR Exclusive: Interview with Bob Bird</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/08/ipr-exclusive-interview-with-bob-bird/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/08/ipr-exclusive-interview-with-bob-bird/</link>
	<description>Covering America's third parties and independent candidates since May 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:27:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/08/ipr-exclusive-interview-with-bob-bird/comment-page-1/#comment-10896</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 18:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=1326#comment-10896</guid>
		<description>I agree.  Great interview.  Very helpful on the abortion question.

I don&#039;t think Ron Paul is allowed to officially endorse Bob Bird.  He can&#039;t endorse a non-Republican if there is a Republican in the race.  He also can&#039;t endorse a Republican challenger against a Republican incumbent in a primary.  That is one reason why his list of endorsements is so different than the freedomslate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  Great interview.  Very helpful on the abortion question.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Ron Paul is allowed to officially endorse Bob Bird.  He can&#8217;t endorse a non-Republican if there is a Republican in the race.  He also can&#8217;t endorse a Republican challenger against a Republican incumbent in a primary.  That is one reason why his list of endorsements is so different than the freedomslate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/08/ipr-exclusive-interview-with-bob-bird/comment-page-1/#comment-9361</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 02:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=1326#comment-9361</guid>
		<description>Great interview with a great candidate.  Thanks G.E.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great interview with a great candidate.  Thanks G.E.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/08/ipr-exclusive-interview-with-bob-bird/comment-page-1/#comment-9226</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=1326#comment-9226</guid>
		<description>My mind is made up: Bob Bird is the best candidate in this election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mind is made up: Bob Bird is the best candidate in this election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.E.</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/08/ipr-exclusive-interview-with-bob-bird/comment-page-1/#comment-9167</link>
		<dc:creator>G.E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=1326#comment-9167</guid>
		<description>Chuck Baldwin should read this:

&lt;blockquote&gt;A nationwide solution to stop abortion is no solution. Here are the problems with it:

A) Protection of unborn human life would rest on a teetering and changing majority. You cannot win every election. Bad solution.

B) It would rely on court interpretations. More trouble.

C) It would rely upon executive willingness to enforce it. Would you trust a President Obama to do so?

D) A Constitutional Amendment would admit that the supreme court had the lawful authority to interfere with this question in the first place.

E) We got abortion-on-demand all nine months of pregnancy from overweening federal power. The solution is not to create MORE federal power, but to reduce it.

F) Federal power created to do something good has always turned into something ugly or unintended. Imagine â€˜Reproductive Bureaucratsâ€™ such as exist in China. They might visit women each month and require to check on menstrual cycles for pregnancy. Then you might have to prove your miscarriage wasnâ€™t an induced abortion.

G) My thesis â€˜The 19th Century Physiciansâ€™ Crusade Against Abortionâ€™ shows that the prolife doctors back then understood that states could manage these difficult social questions best.

H) Finally: we should be â€˜these united Statesâ€™ not â€˜THE United Statesâ€™. In a properly functioning federal republic, we keep the scope of federal power to foreign policy, trade and defense. With a myriad state-to-state defense of unborn human life, we would be spared a sweeping, one-size-fits allâ€™ legislative or judicial tyranny against our descendants.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck Baldwin should read this:</p>
<blockquote><p>A nationwide solution to stop abortion is no solution. Here are the problems with it:</p>
<p>A) Protection of unborn human life would rest on a teetering and changing majority. You cannot win every election. Bad solution.</p>
<p>B) It would rely on court interpretations. More trouble.</p>
<p>C) It would rely upon executive willingness to enforce it. Would you trust a President Obama to do so?</p>
<p>D) A Constitutional Amendment would admit that the supreme court had the lawful authority to interfere with this question in the first place.</p>
<p>E) We got abortion-on-demand all nine months of pregnancy from overweening federal power. The solution is not to create MORE federal power, but to reduce it.</p>
<p>F) Federal power created to do something good has always turned into something ugly or unintended. Imagine â€˜Reproductive Bureaucratsâ€™ such as exist in China. They might visit women each month and require to check on menstrual cycles for pregnancy. Then you might have to prove your miscarriage wasnâ€™t an induced abortion.</p>
<p>G) My thesis â€˜The 19th Century Physiciansâ€™ Crusade Against Abortionâ€™ shows that the prolife doctors back then understood that states could manage these difficult social questions best.</p>
<p>H) Finally: we should be â€˜these united Statesâ€™ not â€˜THE United Statesâ€™. In a properly functioning federal republic, we keep the scope of federal power to foreign policy, trade and defense. With a myriad state-to-state defense of unborn human life, we would be spared a sweeping, one-size-fits allâ€™ legislative or judicial tyranny against our descendants.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/08/ipr-exclusive-interview-with-bob-bird/comment-page-1/#comment-9141</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=1326#comment-9141</guid>
		<description>I&#039;v spoken with Republicans in D.C. this morning, as well as Libertarians and AIPers in Alaska--and I think Bob Bird has a good shot. Rumor is that the voters who like Dave Cuddy (the Ron Paul Republican running against Stevens) will endorse Bird if he loses. A Ron Paul endorsement is also a rumor around the watercooloer.

Of course,these are unsubstantiated rumors--NOT fact. 
Here IS a fact--this man is an incredibly intelligent Constitutionalist. I wish the Libertarian in the race would drop out and endorse Bob Bird. Libertarians can easily feel safe voting for Bird, who probably should have sought their nomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;v spoken with Republicans in D.C. this morning, as well as Libertarians and AIPers in Alaska&#8211;and I think Bob Bird has a good shot. Rumor is that the voters who like Dave Cuddy (the Ron Paul Republican running against Stevens) will endorse Bird if he loses. A Ron Paul endorsement is also a rumor around the watercooloer.</p>
<p>Of course,these are unsubstantiated rumors&#8211;NOT fact.<br />
Here IS a fact&#8211;this man is an incredibly intelligent Constitutionalist. I wish the Libertarian in the race would drop out and endorse Bob Bird. Libertarians can easily feel safe voting for Bird, who probably should have sought their nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darolew</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/08/ipr-exclusive-interview-with-bob-bird/comment-page-1/#comment-9118</link>
		<dc:creator>darolew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=1326#comment-9118</guid>
		<description>Even if Bob Bird loses, let us hope that he at least manages to gain enough Republican support so that Ted Stevens loses. I don&#039;t know much about the Democratic candidate, but it&#039;s hard to imagine how he could be worse than Ted Stevens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if Bob Bird loses, let us hope that he at least manages to gain enough Republican support so that Ted Stevens loses. I don&#8217;t know much about the Democratic candidate, but it&#8217;s hard to imagine how he could be worse than Ted Stevens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darren</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/08/ipr-exclusive-interview-with-bob-bird/comment-page-1/#comment-9108</link>
		<dc:creator>darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=1326#comment-9108</guid>
		<description>Quite a contrast to the incumbent Ted Stevens, who seems to think the constitution protects his right to take bribes in exchange for pork-barrel projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite a contrast to the incumbent Ted Stevens, who seems to think the constitution protects his right to take bribes in exchange for pork-barrel projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.E.</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/08/ipr-exclusive-interview-with-bob-bird/comment-page-1/#comment-9102</link>
		<dc:creator>G.E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 04:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=1326#comment-9102</guid>
		<description>Bob Bird = Definitely the smartest candidate running in 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob Bird = Definitely the smartest candidate running in 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

