Have an INFORMED opinion instead of just an opinion. (Or publish them if you get bored and want to start a shit storm).

By the way: What do you expect us to do with the 60+ files you sent us?

I just made the point that if Phillies was willing to hire someone with Fincher’s background, then his comments on hiring others is less credible. That’s my opinion and I respect your right to disagree with it.

Hey, I’m just putting the info out there. What ANYBODY does with it is THEIR business.

But if the DeFraud neocon Caucus is able to ensure a low turnout in ‘10, then we’re screwed ’til ‘12. The good news: The DeFraud spoils system is hemorrhaging cash and it certainly cannot continue to feed off its host for another four years. The plan to nominate a neocon elitist has backfired, and even sacrificing every possible libertarian principle in an effort to appeal to racist warmongers hasn’t brought in any bucks and will not translate into votes. If the DeFraudster’s had any shame — which they don’t — they’d all crawl under a government-owned rock and stay away from the LP forever. But they’ll keep at it until the well runs dry.

I said anyone who condones Bill Redpath’s actions as chair, before or after his re-election, is too tolerant of corruption to be trusted in the position Wes seeks.

Whom do I suggest?

It doesn’t matter. Because anyone who’s against the Redpath regime’s crimes will not be hired. A crony criminal will get the job, bilk the part for $100k a year or more, and then we’ll have a convention in Hawaii where only the neocon libertines will be able to attend, etc., ad infinitum.

You don’t like Wes because of his support of Redpath, which I’m unsure why he does, but it’s his opinion. Who exactly would you recommend for this job?

No doubt Fincher and his friends will want another round of “did not” and “did too.” Save it. I’ve sent the documentation of what happened in NM to a number of blogs, including this one.

I trust Mr. Benedict, if selected, would keep this man on national’s “do not hire” list.