Monday, December 14, 2009 at 12:50 a.m.
Photo of logan-jenkins
Call Logan at 760-737-7555

A couple of weeks ago, I was on an Oceanside cable TV show and, while asking a question to Richard Rider, I said “recall” when I meant to say “term limits,” .

Aside from senility*, the only explanation for the slip was that these two populist tactics, both designed to turn over the governmental soil for the public good, have become, at least in my mind, joined at the hip.

As Rider, president of San Diego Tax Fighters, said on KOCT, that frontal attack would have suited him far better than what’s on the current petition.

Logan Jenkins: (760) 737-755; logan.jenkins@uniontrib.com

[a] * and after round after round of lay offs, this is one of the brown nosing dufises whom still draws a pay check ………

[b] Sorry for the early attempts not transferring, may be it was the JPEG on the photo …….

Actually, that question was explored at length in followup posts and comments.

http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?s=sonny+landham

Sorry, but as a non L out sider whom has tried to work with Libs in and around Southern California for over a decade, I seem to recall very competent, infact pretty much all, individuals, being assailed ‘ex officio”. Just being a L official seems to put a target on one’s fore head …..

Sad to say, the local GOP third rate daily rag had a Lib related article just today on page A2. Mister San Diego County Libertarian [Tax Payer guardian Richard 'Sand Paper' Rider] was quoted through out the article, the Libertarian Party, of which he is a major, major player, was not mention, even once.

I have already sent off a complaining Letter To The Editor, but the previous regime never printed one of my submissions in a quarter of a century.

Let’s see if any of the local party regulars [Ed Tessiler ?????] can get a word in edge wise. The Union Tribune prints his missives …………….

No one has yet thought to ask the question, how did this individual get Kentucky’s endorsement in the first place? Was it simply because he hung that L after his name? Did they not examine his positions and statements beforehand? Or did he defraud them by hiding this from them?

Between this and the stuff in CA, I have to wonder, why are we so squeamish about removing compromised people from positions that put the party at risk, either in legal terms or in terms of our image and our ability to attract voters?

But come on. Landham isn’t a libertarian. With this racist nonsense in conjunction with his views on labor unions and corporations, he’s actually the antithesis of a libertarian. He’s an opportunist nutjob who is trying to take advantage of LP ballot access.

Thanks for the apology and for a fine demonstration of LPeople skills.

Maybe they should give him another invite…

ART