<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Live from the Revolution March</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/07/live-from-the-revolution-march/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/07/live-from-the-revolution-march/</link>
	<description>Covering America's third parties and independent candidates since May 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:10:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: G.E.</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/07/live-from-the-revolution-march/comment-page-1/#comment-5134</link>
		<dc:creator>G.E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 20:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=613#comment-5134</guid>
		<description>&quot;the whole theocrat aspect of the CP still doesnâ€™t seem to jibe with what I understand abt libertarian capitalism?&quot;

You are correct. Although I don&#039;t think Baldwin is an actual &quot;theocrat,&quot; or anything close to it, I know what you mean by the term.

This site might give you the wrong impression. There are a lot of &quot;Rockwellian&quot; oriented libertarians and libertarian-oriented conservatives who write for and post at this site. In general, libertarians do not consider Baldwin a viable choice.

About Nader and Paul: The two are friends. Paul respects Nader but says that all of the &quot;good&quot; work he&#039;s done would have been better accomplished in the private sector. Paul points to Nader as the type of person who would make things work in a minarchist world by creating free-market institutions that emphasized and certified safety, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the whole theocrat aspect of the CP still doesnâ€™t seem to jibe with what I understand abt libertarian capitalism?&#8221;</p>
<p>You are correct. Although I don&#8217;t think Baldwin is an actual &#8220;theocrat,&#8221; or anything close to it, I know what you mean by the term.</p>
<p>This site might give you the wrong impression. There are a lot of &#8220;Rockwellian&#8221; oriented libertarians and libertarian-oriented conservatives who write for and post at this site. In general, libertarians do not consider Baldwin a viable choice.</p>
<p>About Nader and Paul: The two are friends. Paul respects Nader but says that all of the &#8220;good&#8221; work he&#8217;s done would have been better accomplished in the private sector. Paul points to Nader as the type of person who would make things work in a minarchist world by creating free-market institutions that emphasized and certified safety, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deran</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/07/live-from-the-revolution-march/comment-page-1/#comment-5126</link>
		<dc:creator>Deran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 19:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=613#comment-5126</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this report. I have to give Baldwin credit for being as well organized as his campaign is. But the whole theocrat aspect of the CP still doesn&#039;t seem to jibe with what I understand abt libertarian capitalism?

I&#039;ll be very interested to see how the Paulian gathering during the GOP goes, as far as alternative candidates appearance and appeal.

Does anyone know if Nader and Paul have ever been in contact abt issues, or worked on issues together? Ending corporate welfare for instance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this report. I have to give Baldwin credit for being as well organized as his campaign is. But the whole theocrat aspect of the CP still doesn&#8217;t seem to jibe with what I understand abt libertarian capitalism?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be very interested to see how the Paulian gathering during the GOP goes, as far as alternative candidates appearance and appeal.</p>
<p>Does anyone know if Nader and Paul have ever been in contact abt issues, or worked on issues together? Ending corporate welfare for instance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
