The Libertarian Party of Kentucky will reconsider its endorsement of Senate candidate Sonny Landham Wednesday evening, just days after initially disassociating their party from his bid. This news comes after the office of Kentuckyâ€™s secretary of state announced yesterday that Landham would need 5,000 new petition signatures to secure ballot access to run as an independent.
â€œWeâ€™re really stuck,â€ said Libertarian Party chair Ken Moellman. â€œWe donâ€™t necessarily want to kick him off the ballot.â€
The requisite signatures for Landhamâ€™s ballot access were already reportedly obtained by Libertarian canvassers, but â€“ without the Libertarian endorsement â€“ Landham would need original signatures for an independent candidacy.
With an August 12 deadline for petition submissions, Moellman has said obtaining 5,000 new signatures in that window would be â€œimpossible.â€
Landham was initially stripped of the Libertarian Partyâ€™s endorsement in a unanimous 9-0 vote of their executive committee on Monday night. That vote came after Landham made a series of anti-Arab comments that culminated in his advocacy for a potential Arab genocide.
â€œWhen you are in a war, you kill every thing that moves,â€ responded Landham, when asked if he supported such a dramatic position.
Libertarian Party leaders initially sought to distance themselves from Landhamâ€™s comments, with Moellman noting they were not in line with the Partyâ€™s philosophy.
With his candidacy in the balance now, Moellman says Kentuckyâ€™s difficult ballot access process has the Party reevaluating its decision.
â€œNow, he will have one of two options,â€ said Moellman. â€œA â€“ he runs as a Libertarian or, B he doesnâ€™t run.â€
â€œOur goal was not to kick him out,â€ added Moellman. â€œWe are in a tough spot.â€
Moellman said the ten-person state Libertarian Party Executive Committee will use an â€œonlineâ€ voting system tonight to determine whether to reinstate Landhamâ€™s endorsement.
â€œWeâ€™re trying to work it out,â€ added Moellman.
Moellman said their dilemma would not exist if Kentuckyâ€™s ballot access procedures did not require 5,000 signatures for â€œthird-partyâ€ candidates.
â€œI wish ballot access was a heck of a lot easier,â€ said Moellman, who said the number of signatures required for Democratic and Republican candidates was two â€“ a far easier number for Landham to obtain as an independent candidate.
Delaware Libertarian, Steve Newton explains why this is of national significance:
A Secondhand Conjecture is not a Libertarian blog, although it certainly displays some pretty consistent libertarian leanings.
As I read this post analyzing the Sonny Landham flap and the Libertarian Party of Kentucky, I think Lee hits it right on the money:
Looks like the Libertarian Party of Kentucky has dumped Sonny Landham, previously their clinically insane pick for US Senate. Good for them. Even if given the psychopathic nature of Landham’s views, I feel a little like I’m congratulating them for breathing.
While the Obama campaign might like to think that the LP could pose a serious threat to John McCain in Georgia, the Landham misadventure only reminds me yet again of the extraordinary amateurishness that seems to characterize almost all Libertarian Party political campaigns. There’s simply no excuse for failing to properly vet a candidate you intend to challenge for the seat held by the Senate Minority Leader.
As a former Hollywood actor and convicted criminal, it wouldn’t have been particularly difficult to uncover Landham’s violent imagination or deplorable associations with rightwing hate groups. A simple YouTube and Google search might have sufficed in fact.
+/2+/ noting that we need fewer paper candidates, and more people out there actually campaigning. True. But we also have to stop feeling so needy that we open our arms to accept people who are not only not Libertarians, but whose calls for bombing other countries over trade issues make us look like total losers.