<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wall Street Journal interviews Nader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/05/wall-street-journal-interviews-nader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/05/wall-street-journal-interviews-nader/</link>
	<description>Covering America's third parties and independent candidates since May 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:27:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Levin</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/05/wall-street-journal-interviews-nader/comment-page-1/#comment-1656</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 20:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=182#comment-1656</guid>
		<description>I emailed some of his staffers.  Haven&#039;t got a response yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I emailed some of his staffers.  Haven&#8217;t got a response yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seventy-one</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/05/wall-street-journal-interviews-nader/comment-page-1/#comment-1651</link>
		<dc:creator>seventy-one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=182#comment-1651</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ross!

That&#039;s great! Now if Nader can just add it as the 13th Issue that Matters....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ross!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s great! Now if Nader can just add it as the 13th Issue that Matters&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Levin</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/05/wall-street-journal-interviews-nader/comment-page-1/#comment-1536</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 20:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=182#comment-1536</guid>
		<description>http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/index.php?main_page=product_video_info&amp;products_id=205748-1

It&#039;s about 48 minutes into it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/index.php?main_page=product_video_info&#038;products_id=205748-1" rel="nofollow">http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/index.php?main_page=product_video_info&#038;products_id=205748-1</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s about 48 minutes into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerseyreformjake</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/05/wall-street-journal-interviews-nader/comment-page-1/#comment-1535</link>
		<dc:creator>jerseyreformjake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 20:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=182#comment-1535</guid>
		<description>Anybody think Nader can do better then he did in &#039;08? Of course if he gets on about 40-44 states. I think it&#039;s a real chance, because I feel a lot of people will get turned off when they learn Barr really isn&#039;t as &quot;good guy&quot; as it seems to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody think Nader can do better then he did in &#8217;08? Of course if he gets on about 40-44 states. I think it&#8217;s a real chance, because I feel a lot of people will get turned off when they learn Barr really isn&#8217;t as &#8220;good guy&#8221; as it seems to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seventy-one</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/05/wall-street-journal-interviews-nader/comment-page-1/#comment-1532</link>
		<dc:creator>seventy-one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 20:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=182#comment-1532</guid>
		<description>Did he really Ross? Because I know I&#039;ve had discussions with you on the Gravel forums and on Facebook regarding the matter. Do you have a link to the video on C-Span?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did he really Ross? Because I know I&#8217;ve had discussions with you on the Gravel forums and on Facebook regarding the matter. Do you have a link to the video on C-Span?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Levin</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/05/wall-street-journal-interviews-nader/comment-page-1/#comment-1513</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 17:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=182#comment-1513</guid>
		<description>Nader endorsed the National Initiative (www.ni4d.us) when he went on C-Span recently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nader endorsed the National Initiative (www.ni4d.us) when he went on C-Span recently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LPiberty</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/05/wall-street-journal-interviews-nader/comment-page-1/#comment-1510</link>
		<dc:creator>LPiberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 15:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=182#comment-1510</guid>
		<description>A good read: 

&#039;
There&#039;s more: Mr. Nader wants to slash &quot;the bloated, wasteful military budget. This thing is so out of control that it&#039;s unauditable. But Obama wants to increase the military budget, which is currently distorted away from soldiers and towards these giant weapons systems, and keeping troops in Korea and Japan.&quot; And as for the tax system, Mr. Nader wishes that the Democrats would adhere to his philosophy, which is that &quot;we should first tax things that we like the least, or dislike the most, as a society, before we tax human labor, and necessities . . . through a sales tax.

&quot;So we should tax securities speculation first, before we tax labor. If you go to a store and buy $1,000 worth of products, you pay a sales tax. You buy $1 million worth of derivatives, you pay no sales tax!&quot;

Has he had trouble getting his message out to the American voter? Here, Mr. Nader shows a mild â€“ and understandable â€“ flash of anger over being shut out of the televised presidential debates.

He is also critical of the media. &quot;Since I announced my run, I can&#039;t get on Charlie Rose. Or Diane Rehm or Terry Gross [of NPR]. I haven&#039;t been on Jim Lehrer yet. I got on Wolf Blitzer twice, on CNN. Fox News calls me more than anybody. They have the same attitude, of course â€“ &#039;Here comes the spoiler!&#039; But how can you spoil something that&#039;s spoiled already?

&quot;I don&#039;t complain much publicly. I&#039;ve been told by a lot of the television bookers around the country, &#039;Ralph, they don&#039;t like you.&#039; So the door is shut. But I say to myself, &#039;Should we close down and go to Monterey and watch the whales?&#039; No. Better to fight when you have a small chance, than to fight later when you have no chance at all.&quot;
&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good read: </p>
<p>&#8216;<br />
There&#8217;s more: Mr. Nader wants to slash &#8220;the bloated, wasteful military budget. This thing is so out of control that it&#8217;s unauditable. But Obama wants to increase the military budget, which is currently distorted away from soldiers and towards these giant weapons systems, and keeping troops in Korea and Japan.&#8221; And as for the tax system, Mr. Nader wishes that the Democrats would adhere to his philosophy, which is that &#8220;we should first tax things that we like the least, or dislike the most, as a society, before we tax human labor, and necessities . . . through a sales tax.</p>
<p>&#8220;So we should tax securities speculation first, before we tax labor. If you go to a store and buy $1,000 worth of products, you pay a sales tax. You buy $1 million worth of derivatives, you pay no sales tax!&#8221;</p>
<p>Has he had trouble getting his message out to the American voter? Here, Mr. Nader shows a mild â€“ and understandable â€“ flash of anger over being shut out of the televised presidential debates.</p>
<p>He is also critical of the media. &#8220;Since I announced my run, I can&#8217;t get on Charlie Rose. Or Diane Rehm or Terry Gross [of NPR]. I haven&#8217;t been on Jim Lehrer yet. I got on Wolf Blitzer twice, on CNN. Fox News calls me more than anybody. They have the same attitude, of course â€“ &#8216;Here comes the spoiler!&#8217; But how can you spoil something that&#8217;s spoiled already?</p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t complain much publicly. I&#8217;ve been told by a lot of the television bookers around the country, &#8216;Ralph, they don&#8217;t like you.&#8217; So the door is shut. But I say to myself, &#8216;Should we close down and go to Monterey and watch the whales?&#8217; No. Better to fight when you have a small chance, than to fight later when you have no chance at all.&#8221;<br />
&#8216;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerseyreformjake</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/05/wall-street-journal-interviews-nader/comment-page-1/#comment-1507</link>
		<dc:creator>jerseyreformjake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 15:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=182#comment-1507</guid>
		<description>You may not agree with Nader on many things or anything at all, but we have to agree on two thing. He does a good job getting publicitry for third parties, and also hopefully he can open some eyes for the ballot access issues the LP, GP, CP, and RFP face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may not agree with Nader on many things or anything at all, but we have to agree on two thing. He does a good job getting publicitry for third parties, and also hopefully he can open some eyes for the ballot access issues the LP, GP, CP, and RFP face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

