<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Token update: seven debate, eight speeches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/05/token-update-seven-debate-eight-speeches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/05/token-update-seven-debate-eight-speeches/</link>
	<description>Covering America's third parties and independent candidates since May 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:40:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viverrid</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/05/token-update-seven-debate-eight-speeches/comment-page-1/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Viverrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 12:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=89#comment-482</guid>
		<description>While I think Smith is a more able speaker than Jingozian, I do not think she should have been up on that stage. Each candidate had the same opportunity to gather enough tokens to show they had sufficient support to be up there (and on C-Span cameras). Smith was not able to do that. I do assume, however, that  Smith is able to make her case to the delegates privately if she so wishes. In fact, she probably is doing just that.

That said, I do not believe the duopoly will take notice of any candidate&#039;s exclusion from a Libertarian debate. Perhaps they will if the party expands to the point where they become competitive - but until then, I&#039;m afraid only very few are even aware of the situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I think Smith is a more able speaker than Jingozian, I do not think she should have been up on that stage. Each candidate had the same opportunity to gather enough tokens to show they had sufficient support to be up there (and on C-Span cameras). Smith was not able to do that. I do assume, however, that  Smith is able to make her case to the delegates privately if she so wishes. In fact, she probably is doing just that.</p>
<p>That said, I do not believe the duopoly will take notice of any candidate&#8217;s exclusion from a Libertarian debate. Perhaps they will if the party expands to the point where they become competitive &#8211; but until then, I&#8217;m afraid only very few are even aware of the situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cato</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/05/token-update-seven-debate-eight-speeches/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>cato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 04:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=89#comment-468</guid>
		<description>It is a shame Christine Smith was not given an opportunity to debate.  The Democrats and Republicans can use that kind of exclusion as ammo against us in the fall.  Initial support doesn&#039;t always predict how someone will fare once people get to hear them!  In the interest of fairness, she should be allowed, in front of the convention, before the nominations start,  to answer the same questions the debaters were asked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a shame Christine Smith was not given an opportunity to debate.  The Democrats and Republicans can use that kind of exclusion as ammo against us in the fall.  Initial support doesn&#8217;t always predict how someone will fare once people get to hear them!  In the interest of fairness, she should be allowed, in front of the convention, before the nominations start,  to answer the same questions the debaters were asked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin Cassidy</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/05/token-update-seven-debate-eight-speeches/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin Cassidy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 00:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=89#comment-465</guid>
		<description>Ditto!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Trosper</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/05/token-update-seven-debate-eight-speeches/comment-page-1/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Trosper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 22:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=89#comment-456</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see some pictures of the hospitality suites!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see some pictures of the hospitality suites!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.E.</title>
		<link>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/05/token-update-seven-debate-eight-speeches/comment-page-1/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>G.E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 22:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/?p=89#comment-443</guid>
		<description>Jingo&#039;s a nice guy, a good speaker, and he has an awesome hospitality suite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jingo&#8217;s a nice guy, a good speaker, and he has an awesome hospitality suite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

